Optimization of Ceramic Paste Viscosity Use for the Elaboration of Tubular Membrane Support by Extrusion and Its Application

The objective of this work was to determine the optimum size and amount of raw materials which influence the viscosity of ceramic paste using the experimental design for the production of tubular support by the extrusion technique and its application in microfiltration. The Box Behnken design was used to optimize the viscosity of the ceramic paste. ANOVA was used to model the system represented by independent parameters and dependent output response and to optimize the system by estimating the statistical parameters. A three-factor and three-level design was used generating thus 15 experiments. The independent factors were the amount of porogen, size of porogen and amount of binder and dependent factor the viscosity of the ceramic paste. The minimum (−1), intermediate (0) and maximum (+1) level of the amount of porogen, size of porogen and amount of binder used were 20 g, 30 g and 40 g, 50 μm, 100 μm and 150 μm, and 2 g, 3.5 g and 5 g respectively. The statistical analyses showed that the values of the answers would adapt to a second degree polynomial model. The R-square value obtained was greater than 95%, the Biais factor was equal to the unit and the Absolute Average Deviation (AAD) equal to the zero thus validating the model. The optimal size of raw material was found to be 100 μm for an amount of clay of 66 g, amount of porogen of 30 g and amount of binder of 4 g. The optimum viscosity of the ceramic paste was found to be 26.7 Pa∙s which is close to the viscosity of the clay paste only found to be 28.5 Pa∙s, thus good for shaping by the extrusion technique. The ceramic paste showed a pseudo-plastic behavior. The tubular porous support was sintered at 950°C and the dimensions, such as outer and inner diameters and length of the tube were 4 cm, 2 cm, and 19 cm, respectively. The sintered membrane possesses a porosity of 43.5%, water permeability of 244.9 L/h∙m2 bar, an average pore size of 2.4 μm and mechanical strength of 9.2 MPa with very good corrosion resistance in acidic and basic conditions. The membrane was subjected to microfiltration of synthetic clay suspension at various combinations of applied pressures (0.5 - 2 bar) with a feed concentration of 100 NTU. An increase in the applied pressure leads to an increase in the flow rate and retention rate. The flow rate decreases steadily with time. The highest retention was obtained at 2 bar with permeability of 184.69 L/h∙m2 bar and a retention of 96% decreasing the turbidity to about 3.5 NTU which is below the acceptable value of 5 NTU.

[1]  E. Mirzaei,et al.  Evaluating the effect of pH on mechanical strength and cell compatibility of nanostructured collagen hydrogel by the plastic compression method , 2018 .

[2]  M. Adib,et al.  Valorization the waste of the wood industry (sawdust) and their use as adsorbent material: physicochemical characterization and modeling of optimization sorption using statistical approach , 2018 .

[3]  B. C. Meikap,et al.  Application of response surface analysis to iron ore slurry rheology using microwave pre-treatment , 2017 .

[4]  N. Mondal,et al.  Optimisation using central composite design (CCD) and the desirability function for sorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution onto Lemna major , 2016 .

[5]  Marwa S. Elazazy,et al.  Interaction of p-synephrine with p-chloranil: experimental design and multiple response optimization , 2016 .

[6]  M. Kabbaj,et al.  A statistical approach based on the full factorial experiment for optimization of dyes adsorption on biomaterials prepared from mint and tea , 2016 .

[7]  R. Kumar,et al.  Elaboration of novel tubular ceramic membrane from inexpensive raw materials by extrusion method and its performance in microfiltration of synthetic oily wastewater treatment , 2015 .

[8]  M. Ghaedi,et al.  Rapid removal of Auramine-O and Methylene blue by ZnS:Cu nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: A response surface methodology approach , 2015 .

[9]  S. Cerneaux,et al.  Microfiltration ceramic membranes from local Cameroonian clay applicable to water treatment , 2015 .

[10]  R. Kumar,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of MCM-41-ceramic composite membrane for the separation of chromic acid from aqueous solution , 2015 .

[11]  I. Abubakar,et al.  Characterization of Dabagi clay deposit for its creamics potential , 2014 .

[12]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Tubular macro-porous titanium membranes , 2014 .

[13]  H. Goicoechea,et al.  Experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. , 2014, Talanta.

[14]  Mohammed Sabah Ali,et al.  Factors Affecting the Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Porous Ceramic Composite Materials , 2014 .

[15]  V. M. Sonde,et al.  Formulation and Comparison of Experimental based Mathematical Model with Artificial Neural Network Simulation and RSM (Response Surface Methodology) Model for Optimal Performance of Sliver Cutting Operation of Bamboo , 2014 .

[16]  I. Yakub Micro- and Nano- Porous Adsorptive Materials for Removal of Contaminants from Water at Point-of-Use , 2012 .

[17]  Jing Fang,et al.  Preparation and characterization of tubular supported ceramic microfiltration membranes from fly ash , 2011 .

[18]  H. Pitawala,et al.  Identification of an appropriate body composition for red clay products , 2010 .

[19]  G. Pugazhenthi,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of γ-Al2O3–clay composite ultrafiltration membrane for the separation of electrolytes from its aqueous solution , 2009 .

[20]  A. Esharghawi,et al.  Contribution to porous mullite synthesis from clays by adding Al and Mg powders , 2009 .

[21]  D. Dong,et al.  Elaboration and chemical corrosion resistance of tubular macro-porous cordierite ceramic membrane supports , 2007 .

[22]  C. Leonelli,et al.  Characterisation of porcelain compositions using two china clays from Cameroon , 2007 .

[23]  A. Larbot,et al.  Elaboration and characterisation of apatite based mineral supports for microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes , 2007 .

[24]  Sophie M. Johnson Health and water quality monitoring of Pure Home Water's ceramic filter dissemination in the northern region of Ghana , 2007 .

[25]  Nadia El Yakoubi,et al.  Potentialité d'utilisation d'argiles marocaines de Jbel Kharrou dans l'industrie céramique , 2006 .

[26]  A. Larbot,et al.  Porous ceramic supports for membranes prepared from kaolin and doloma mixtures , 2006 .

[27]  A. Larbot,et al.  Elaboration and characterization of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes deposited on raw support prepared from natural Moroccan clay: Application to filtration of solution containing dyes and salts , 2006 .

[28]  P. Prádanos,et al.  Preparation and characterization of non-supported microfiltration membranes from aluminosilicates , 2004 .

[29]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook , 1998 .

[30]  H. P. Hsieh,et al.  Inorganic Membranes for Separation and Reaction , 1996 .

[31]  L. Cot,et al.  Fundamentals of inorganic membrane science and technology , 1996 .