Assessment of structural and functional similarity of biosimilar products: Rituximab as a case study

ABSTRACT Biosimilars are products that are similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to an already licensed reference/ innovator product and are expected to offer improved affordability. The most significant source of reduction in the cost of development of a biosimilar is the reduced clinical examination that it is expected to undergo as compared to the innovator product. However, this clinical relief is predicated on the assumption that there is analytical similarity between the biosimilar and the innovator product. As a result, establishing analytical similarity is arguably the most important step towards successful development of a biosimilar. Here, we present results from an analytical similarity exercise that was performed with five biosimilars of rituximab (Ristova®, Roche), a chimeric mouse/ human monoclonal antibody biotherapeutic, that are available on the Indian market. The results show that, while the biosimilars exhibited similarity with respect to protein structure and function, there were significant differences with respect to size heterogeneity, charge heterogeneity and glycosylation pattern.

[1]  Neh Nupur,et al.  Assessing analytical comparability of biosimilars: GCSF as a case study. , 2016, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[2]  Anurag S Rathore,et al.  Should charge variants of monoclonal antibody therapeutics be considered critical quality attributes? , 2016, Electrophoresis.

[3]  M. Fink,et al.  Target-directed development and preclinical characterization of the proposed biosimilar rituximab GP2013 , 2014, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[4]  A. Almasan,et al.  Development of Novel Anti-Cd20 Monoclonal Antibodies and Modulation in Cd20 Levels on Cell Surface: Looking to Improve Immunotherapy Response , 2015, Journal of cancer science & therapy.

[5]  A. Vizel’,et al.  Investigation of N-terminal glutamate cyclization of recombinant monoclonal antibody in formulation development. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[6]  Jason J Z Liao,et al.  Comparability of critical quality attributes for establishing biosimilarity , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  C. Fritsch,et al.  Physicochemical and Functional Comparability Between the Proposed Biosimilar Rituximab GP2013 and Originator Rituximab , 2013, BioDrugs.

[8]  Dong-Il Kim,et al.  Physicochemical characterization of Remsima® , 2014, mAbs.

[9]  Kouhei Tsumoto,et al.  Fucose depletion from human IgG1 oligosaccharide enhances binding enthalpy and association rate between IgG1 and FcgammaRIIIa. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Jill Crouse-Zeineddini,et al.  Biochemical assessment of erythropoietin products from Asia versus US Epoetin alfa manufactured by Amgen. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[11]  Yelena Lyubarskaya,et al.  Analysis of recombinant monoclonal antibody isoforms by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry as a strategy for streamlining characterization of recombinant monoclonal antibody charge heterogeneity. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[12]  Sol Ruiz,et al.  Development and Regulation of Biosimilars: Current Status and Future Challenges , 2013, BioDrugs.

[13]  G. Salles,et al.  Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcgammaRIIIa gene. , 2002, Blood.

[14]  Marcella Yu,et al.  Production, characterization and pharmacokinetic properties of antibodies with N-linked Mannose-5 glycans , 2012, mAbs.

[15]  A. Rathore Guidelines on Similar Biologics: Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authorization in India , 2012, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[16]  Hongcheng Liu,et al.  Characterization of the stability of a fully human monoclonal IgG after prolonged incubation at elevated temperature. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[17]  M. Caligiuri,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Clinically Utilized CD20-Directed Antibodies in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells Reveals Divergent NK Cell, Monocyte, and Macrophage Properties , 2013, The Journal of Immunology.

[18]  Xuhui Zhou,et al.  The role of complement in the mechanism of action of rituximab for B-cell lymphoma: implications for therapy. , 2008, The oncologist.

[19]  M. Parr,et al.  Comparability study of Rituximab originator and follow‐on biopharmaceutical , 2017, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[20]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with enhanced affinity for CD16 activates NK cells at lower concentrations and more effectively than rituximab. , 2005, Blood.

[21]  M. Satoh,et al.  Improving effector functions of antibodies for cancer treatment: Enhancing ADCC and CDC , 2008, Drug design, development and therapy.

[22]  J. Kong,et al.  Obtaining information about protein secondary structures in aqueous solution using Fourier transform IR spectroscopy , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[23]  T. Schofield,et al.  ICH Q5C Stability Testing of Biotechnological/Biological Products , 2017 .

[24]  J. Anaya,et al.  Similar biotherapeutic products in Latin America. Regulation and opportunities for patients with autoimmune diseases , 2013 .

[25]  Alex Eon-Duval,et al.  Quality attributes of recombinant therapeutic proteins: An assessment of impact on safety and efficacy as part of a quality by design development approach , 2012, Biotechnology progress.

[26]  Anurag S Rathore,et al.  Rapid analysis of charge variants of monoclonal antibodies using non-linear salt gradient in cation-exchange high performance liquid chromatography. , 2015, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  N. O. Pérez,et al.  PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF RITUXIMAB , 2014 .

[28]  C. López-Morales,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Comparability of a Biosimilar Trastuzumab Anticipated from Its Physicochemical and Biological Characterization , 2015, BioMed research international.

[29]  Hongwei Xie,et al.  Rapid comparison of a candidate biosimilar to an innovator monoclonal antibody with advanced liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry technologies , 2010, mAbs.

[30]  GUIDELINE ON DEVELOPMENT , PRODUCTION , CHARACTERISATION AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND RELATED PRODUCTS , 2009 .

[31]  H. Schellekens Assessing the bioequivalence of biosimilars The Retacrit case. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[32]  M. Morbidelli,et al.  Aggregation Stability of a Monoclonal Antibody During Downstream Processing , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[33]  E. Moors,et al.  Clinical comparability and European biosimilar regulations , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  The N-end rule: functions, mysteries, uses. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  R. Jordan,et al.  Galactosylation variations in marketed therapeutic antibodies , 2012, mAbs.

[36]  T. Born,et al.  Demonstration of Functional Similarity of Proposed Biosimilar ABP 501 to Adalimumab , 2016, BioDrugs.

[37]  François Debaene,et al.  Analytical characterization of biosimilar antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins , 2013 .

[38]  Ramani R. Raghavan,et al.  ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Processes , 2017 .

[39]  Wei Wang,et al.  Antibody structure, instability, and formulation. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[40]  Armin Ruf,et al.  Unique carbohydrate–carbohydrate interactions are required for high affinity binding between FcγRIII and antibodies lacking core fucose , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  J. Ravetch,et al.  Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Immunoglobulin G Resulting from Fc Sialylation , 2006, Science.

[42]  G. Weiner,et al.  Rituximab: mechanism of action. , 2010, Seminars in hematology.

[43]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Effects of protein aggregates: An immunologic perspective , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[44]  Nancy D. Ramírez-Ibañez,et al.  Assessment of Physicochemical Properties of Rituximab Related to Its Immunomodulatory Activity , 2015, Journal of immunology research.

[45]  W. Xu,et al.  Chromatographic analysis of the acidic and basic species of recombinant monoclonal antibodies , 2012, mAbs.

[46]  Rahul S Rajan,et al.  Formation of pyroglutamic acid from N-terminal glutamic acid in immunoglobulin gamma antibodies. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[47]  GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS CONTAINING BIOTECHNOLOGY-DERIVED PROTEINS AS ACTIVE SUBSTANCE: NON-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL ISSUES , 2011 .

[48]  Martin Schiestl,et al.  Acceptable changes in quality attributes of glycosylated biopharmaceuticals , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  C. Russell Middaugh,et al.  Protein comparability assessments and potential applicability of high throughput biophysical methods and data visualization tools to compare physical stability profiles , 2014, Front. Pharmacol..

[50]  Matthew T. Mazur,et al.  A Platform for Characterizing Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody Breakdown Products by 2D Chromatography and Top-Down Mass Spectrometry , 2012, The AAPS Journal.

[51]  T. C. B. McLeish,et al.  Polymer Physics , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[52]  Jianping Ding,et al.  Structural Basis for Recognition of CD20 by Therapeutic Antibody Rituximab* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  Anurag S Rathore,et al.  Follow-on protein products: scientific issues, developments and challenges. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[54]  Nitin Yadav,et al.  Circular dichroism spectroscopy as a tool for monitoring aggregation in monoclonal antibody therapeutics. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[55]  Safaraz K. Niazi Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process , 2016, Handbook of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Formulations, Second Edition.

[56]  Shawn Cao,et al.  Assessing Analytical Similarity of Proposed Amgen Biosimilar ABP 501 to Adalimumab , 2016, BioDrugs.

[57]  Dietmar Reusch,et al.  Fc glycans of therapeutic antibodies as critical quality attributes , 2015, Glycobiology.

[58]  W. Friess,et al.  FTIR and nDSC as Analytical Tools for High-Concentration Protein Formulations , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[59]  H. Schellekens How similar do 'biosimilars' need to be? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[60]  D. Alonso,et al.  Comparability of Antibody-Mediated Cell Killing Activity Between a Proposed Biosimilar RTXM83 and the Originator Rituximab , 2016, BioDrugs.

[61]  A. al‐Sabbagh,et al.  Patient attitudes and understanding about biosimilars: an international cross-sectional survey , 2016, Patient preference and adherence.

[62]  D. Suckau,et al.  Correct primary structure assessment and extensive glyco-profiling of cetuximab by a combination of intact, middle-up, middle-down and bottom-up ESI and MALDI mass spectrometry techniques , 2013, mAbs.

[63]  B. Karger,et al.  Comparability analysis of anti-CD20 commercial (rituximab) and RNAi-mediated fucosylated antibodies by two LC-MS approaches , 2013, mAbs.

[64]  M. Schenerman,et al.  Advances in the assessment and control of the effector functions of therapeutic antibodies , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.