Invention Machines: How Control Instruments and Information Technologies Drove Global Technologigal Progress over a Century of Invention

Abstract Inventions depend on skills, experience, and information exchange. Information is shared among individuals and organizations both intentionally and unintentionally. Unintentional flows of knowledge, or knowledge spillovers, are viewed as an integral element of technological progress. However, little is known about the overall patterns of knowledge flows across technology sectors or over long periods of time. This paper explores whether it is possible to identify “invention machines” – technologies that help create new inventions in a wide range of other sectors – and whether shifts in the patterns of knowledge flows can predict future technological change. In the spirit of big data we analyze the entire PatStat database of 90 million published patents from 160 patent offices over a century of invention and exploit variation within and across countries and technology fields over time. The direction and intensity of knowledge spillovers measured from prior-art citations highlight the transition from mechanical to electrical instruments, especially industrial control systems, and the rise of information and communication technologies as “invention machines” after 1970. Most recently, the rapidly increasing impact of digital communications on other fields may herald the emergence of cloud computing and the industrial internet as the new dominant industrial paradigm.

[1]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Agglomeration of Invention in the Bay Area: Not Just ICT † , 2016 .

[2]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Desperately Seeking Spillovers?: Increasing Returns, Industrial Organization and the Location of New Entrants in Geographic and Technological Space , 2006 .

[3]  Petra Moser,et al.  How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World Fairs , 2003 .

[4]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[5]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Kenneth I. Carlaw,et al.  Externalities, technological complementarities and sustained economic growth , 2002 .

[7]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis , 2002 .

[8]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth , 2008 .

[9]  M. Guarnieri The Age of Vacuum Tubes: Early Devices and the Rise of Radio Communications [Historical] , 2012, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[10]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Srikanth Paruchuri,et al.  Intraorganizational Networks, Interorganizational Networks, and the Impact of Central Inventors: A Longitudinal Study of Pharmaceutical Firms , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor versus examiner citations in European patents , 2005 .

[13]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Scientific instrumentation and university research , 1992 .

[14]  Cliff T. Bekar,et al.  General purpose technologies , 2013 .

[15]  Nicholas Crafts,et al.  Steam as a General Purpose Technology: A Growth Accounting Perspective , 2004 .

[16]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[17]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[18]  P. David The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox , 1990 .

[19]  B. Carlsson,et al.  Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review , 2009 .

[20]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies , 1996 .

[21]  Tom Nicholas,et al.  Was Electricity a General Purpose Technology? , 2004 .

[22]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[23]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[24]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards , 2009 .

[25]  Michael Marien,et al.  Book Review: The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies , 2014 .

[26]  B. Verspagen,et al.  The early diffusion of the steam engine in Britain, 1700–1800: a reappraisal , 2011 .

[27]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .