The Appropriateness of Hysterectomy: A Comparison of Care in Seven Health Plans

Objective. —To develop and test a method for comparing the appropriateness of hysterectomy use in different health plans. Design. —Retrospective cohort study. Setting. —Seven managed care organizations. Patients. —Random sample of all nonemergency, nononcological hysterectomies performed in the seven managed care organizations over a 1-year period. Patients who were not continuously enrolled in a plan for 2 years prior to their hysterectomy were excluded. Main Outcome Measures. —Proportion of women undergoing hysterectomy in each plan for inappropriate clinical reasons according to ratings derived from a panel of managed care physicians. Results. —Overall, about 16% of women underwent hysterectomy for reasons judged to be clinically inappropriate. Only one plan had significantly more hysterectomies rated inappropriate compared with the group mean (27%, unadjusted). Adjusting for age and race did not affect the rankings of the plans and had little effect on the numeric results. Conclusion. —The rates of inappropriate use of hysterectomies are similar to those for other procedures and vary to a small degree among health plans. This information may be useful to purchasers when they consider which health plans to offer their employees. ( JAMA . 1993;269:2398-2402)

[1]  H. Selbmann.  [Quality assurance in obstetrics and gynecology]. , 1993, Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau.

[2]  S Greenfield,et al.  Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the medical outcomes study. , 1992, JAMA.

[3]  E. McGlynn,et al.  Hysterectomy: A Literature Review and Ratings of Appropriateness , 1992 .

[4]  R. Reiter,et al.  Validation of hysterectomy indications and the quality assurance process , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  R. Pokras,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1965-84. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[6]  K. Kahn,et al.  Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[7]  D. Grimes,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  F. Dyck,et al.  Effect of surveillance on the number of hysterectomies in the province of Saskatchewan. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. nd.  Unnecessary-elective-indicated? Audit criteria of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to assess abdominal hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. , 1977 .

[10]  C. Lowe,et al.  Indices of obesity derived from body weight and height. , 1967, British journal of preventive & social medicine.

[11]  Doyle Jc.  Unnecessary hysterectomies: study of 6,248 operations in thirty-five hospitals during 1948. , 1953 .

[12]  N. F. Miller,et al.  Hysterectomy; therapeutic necessity or surgical racket? , 1946, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.