Some men like it black, some women like it pink: consumer implications of differences in male and female website design

The World Wide Web doubles in size roughly every 2–3 months and dramatic claims are made about the effectiveness of Web-based commercial efforts. The centrality of non-price mechanisms of differentiation to the perception, enjoyment and ease of use felt using websites is acknowledged but the only statistically rigorous studies of factors such as form and content have been conducted within a universalist paradigm of aesthetics. This paper reports on an interactionist approach to web aesthetics involving an analysis of 60 male- and female-produced websites. The analysis reveals statistically significant differences between the male- and female-produced websites on 13 out of the 23 factors analysed. These differences span issues of navigation as well as linguistic and visual content. The paper argues that the appeal of websites can be maximised if they mirror the needs and interests of their target populations and that websites targeted at male or female dominated markets need to reflect the aesthetic diversity found in the male- and female-produced websites analysed here. It also presents information on the demographics of the IT profession, showing that there is a potential imbalance between the percentage of women involved online and those involved in the IT profession. This suggests that the male domination of the IT profession could be a barrier to the effective mirroring of female Website preferences. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jos van Iwaarden,et al.  Perceptions about the quality of web sites: a survey amongst students at Northeastern University and Erasmus University , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[2]  G. Walsh,et al.  Gender differences in German consumer decision‐making styles , 2004 .

[3]  Melanie Wilson,et al.  A conceptual framework for studying gender in information systems research , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[5]  T. Melewar,et al.  The Internet revolution: some global marketing implications , 2003 .

[6]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Jim Blythe,et al.  A guide to a more effective World Wide Web presence , 2003 .

[8]  France Bélanger,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping , 2002, CACM.

[9]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[10]  A. Colman,et al.  Choices and preferences: Experiments on gender differences , 2001 .

[11]  M. Evans,et al.  Consumer interaction in the virtual era: some qualitative insights , 2001 .

[12]  Hugh Miller,et al.  Gender and web home pages , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Bo N. Schenkman,et al.  Aesthetics and preferences of web pages , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[14]  G. Moss.  Gender and consumer behaviour: Further explorations , 1999 .

[15]  G. Greer.  The Whole Woman , 1999 .

[16]  “She knows what she wants…”: towards a female consumption risk‐reducing strategy framework , 1998 .

[17]  P. Jordan.  Human factors for pleasure in product use. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Status Report on Women and Men in the IT Workplace , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[19]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Factors influencing personal computer usage: the gender gap , 1996 .

[20]  J. Porteous.  Environmental Aesthetics: Ideas, Politics and Planning , 1996 .

[21]  A taxonomy of couples based on influence strategies: The case of home purchase , 1996 .

[22]  Gloria Moss,et al.  Assessment: Do Males and Females make Judgements in a Self-selecting Fashion? , 1996 .

[23]  G. Moss.  Sex — the misunderstood variable , 1996 .

[24]  Gloria Moss,et al.  Differences in the design aesthetic of men and women: Implications for product branding , 1995 .

[25]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[26]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An Examination of Gender Effects on the Career Success of Information Systems Employees , 1993 .

[27]  R. Donovan.  Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior , 1994 .

[28]  Mel Yamamoto,et al.  The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products , 1994 .

[29]  J. Pahl,et al.  Social and Economic Change and the Organisation of Money within Marriage , 1993 .

[30]  Andrea Groppel.  Store Design and Experience-Orientated Consumers in Retailing: a Comparison Between the United States and Germany , 1993 .

[31]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension , 1992 .

[32]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[33]  Paul Greenhalgh,et al.  The Empathy Principle: Towards a model for the Psychology of Art , 1992 .

[34]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Environmental aesthetics : theory, research, and applications , 1988 .

[35]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Aesthetics, Ideologies and the Limits of the Marketing Concept , 1983 .

[36]  H. L. Davis,et al.  Perception of Marital Roles in Decision Processes , 1974 .

[37]  P. Kotler.  Atmospherics as a Marketing Tool , 1974 .

[38]  B. Silverman,et al.  Consequences, racial discrimination, and the principle of belief congruence. , 1974 .

[39]  D. Byrne,et al.  ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  T. Brock,et al.  COMMUNICATOR-RECIPIENT SIMILARITY AND DECISION CHANGE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.