Action Research: a valuable research technique for service delivery development

AbstractThe evaluation of healthcare practice and service delivery is fraught with difficulties. Service development and / or delivery occurs within socially dynamic settings which are in a continual state of change. Service development also often involves large elements of improvisation. The action research approach is useful for health service research, as it supports collaboration between researchers and practitioners, and not only allows but makes explicit that the action researcher has both roles within the setting being studied. This paper discusses action research methodology and offers insight into principles that favor its use for service delivery development. This includes consideration of the interactive variables within studies of health care systems and the importance of evaluating relationships between stakeholders to understand how these factors or variables, which cannot be controlled for, are responsible for successful development of the service. Action research facilitates change and helps bridge the heory--practice gap. With the current dynamic changes within both the pharmacy profession and national health services, researchers may find the action research technique of value when considering new roles and innovative ways of engaging in collaborative, multi-disciplinary working to improve delivery of patient care.

[1]  J. Meyer,et al.  Qualitative research in health care: Using qualitative methods in health related action research , 2000 .

[2]  S. Botes Primary care groups. , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[3]  A. Baumann,et al.  Toward evidence‐based policy decisions: a case study of nursing health human resources in Ontario, Canada , 2000 .

[4]  B. Warburton,et al.  The relationship between research and service development: an illustrative example of a pilot study introducing complementary therapies into primary care. , 1999, Clinical performance and quality health care.

[5]  C Webb Partners in research. , 1990, Nursing times.

[6]  C. Brach,et al.  Wrestling with Typology: Penetrating the “Black Box” of Managed Care by Focusing on Health Care System Characteristics , 2000, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[7]  K. Knight,et al.  Primary care groups. Supra troupers. , 1999, The Health service journal.

[8]  Justin Beilby,et al.  Collaborative medication management services: improving patient care , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.

[9]  A. Booth,et al.  Evaluating information service innovations in the health service: ‘If I was planning on going there I wouldn’t start from here’ , 2001 .

[10]  L. Strand,et al.  Pharmaceutical Care Practice , 1998 .

[11]  Development of the specialist menopause pharmacist (SMP) role within a research framework , 2005, Pharmacy World and Science.

[12]  E. Geden Research for nursing: A guide for the enquiring nurse by J. M. Clark and L. Hockey. Aylesbury, England: H M & M, 1979, 176 pp., $3.95 (approx. $8). , 1982 .

[13]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1999 .

[14]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[15]  J. Meyer,et al.  New paradigm research in practice: the trials and tribulations of action research. , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  Robert Dingwall,et al.  Catching Goldfish: Quality in Qualitative Research , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[17]  Julius Sim,et al.  Action Research for Health and Social Care: A guide to practice , 1996 .

[18]  S B Sharkey,et al.  An approach to consensus building using the Delphi technique: developing a learning resource in mental health. , 2001, Nurse education today.

[19]  A. Casebeer,et al.  Transforming a Health Care System: Managing Change for Community Gain , 2000, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[20]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .