Arm position during daily activity.

A new method of evaluation for functional assessment of the shoulder during daily activity is presented. An ambulatory system using inertial sensors attached on the humerus was used to detect the ability to work at a specific position of the shoulder. Nine arm positions were defined based on humerus elevation. The method was tested on 31 healthy volunteer subjects. First, we estimated the ability of the system to detect the different elevation angles and arm positions of each subject. Following that, we evaluated their arm positions during approximately 8h of daily activities. Each arm position was recognized with a good sensitivity (range 80-100%) and specificity (range 96-99%). During daily activity, we estimated the frequency (number/h) that the humerus reached each arm position during the periods of 0-1s (period P1), 1-5s (period P2) and 5-30s (period P3). Our data showed that all subjects had 96% of their arm position reached under the 5th level (100-120 degrees ). No significant difference was observed between dominant and non-dominant sides for the frequency and duration of arm positions (p>0.3). Our evaluation was in accordance with the clinical questionnaire (the Constant score) for the P1 duration, but differed for longer periods P2 and P3. By quantifying the arm positions and their durations for both shoulders, we proposed a new score to evaluate the ability to work at a specific level based on the symmetry index of the arms activity. Using this score, we obtained, on average, good symmetry for healthy subjects. This score can be useful in evaluating the asymmetry in arm function in patients with a shoulder disease. The proposed technique could be used in a number of shoulder diseases where problems in performing daily activities should be expressed in terms of objective measure of arm position.

[1]  Malcolm H Granat,et al.  Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  A. Carr,et al.  An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  M. Granat,et al.  Monitoring functional ranges of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[4]  C. Wiktorin,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer for measuring arm movements. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  L. A. Rozendaal,et al.  Reliability of force direction dependent EMG parameters of shoulder muscles for clinical measurements. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  Rita M. Kiss,et al.  Electromyographic analysis in patients with multidirectional shoulder instability during pull, forward punch, elevation and overhead throw , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  J. Klafter,et al.  Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings , 2005 .

[10]  C.G.M. Meskers,et al.  3D shoulder position measurements using a six-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking device. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  Maury A Nussbaum,et al.  Fatigue during prolonged intermittent overhead work: reliability of measures and effects of working height , 2007, Ergonomics.

[12]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Work above shoulder level and degenerative alterations of the rotator cuff tendons: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  B. Nigg,et al.  Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. , 1987, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[14]  G. Hansson,et al.  Validity and reliability of triaxial accelerometers for inclinometry in posture analysis , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[15]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  B. J. Winer,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd Edition. , 1973 .

[17]  S E Mathiassen,et al.  Precision of measurements of physical workload during standardised manual handling. Part II: Inclinometry of head, upper back, neck and upper arms. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Outcome evaluation in shoulder surgery using 3D kinematics sensors. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[19]  J. Klafter,et al.  Temporal generation of power-law distributions: A universal ‘oligarchy mechanism’ , 2007 .

[20]  Michael F. Shlesinger,et al.  Strange kinetics , 1993, Nature.

[21]  P Asterland,et al.  Questionnaire versus direct technical measurements in assessing postures and movements of the head, upper back, arms and hands. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[22]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[23]  C. Constant,et al.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Garth R Johnson,et al.  A study of the external forces and moments at the shoulder and elbow while performing every day tasks. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .