Customer satisfaction in a large urban fire department emergency medical services system.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine if emergency medical services (EMS) customer satisfaction could be assessed using telephone-survey methods. The process by which customer satisfaction with the EMS service in a large, fire department-based EMS system is reported, and five month results are presented. METHODS Ten percent of all patients transported during the period of October 15, 2001, through March 15, 2002, were selected for study. In addition, during the same period, all EMS incidents in which a patient was not transported were identified for contact. Customer-service representatives contacted patients via telephone and surveyed them from prepared scripts. RESULTS A total of 88,528 EMS incidents occurred during the study period. Of these, 53,649 resulted in patient transports and 34,879 did not. Ten percent of patients transported (5,098) were selected for study participation, of which 2,498 were successfully contacted; of these, 2,368 (94.8%) reported overall satisfaction with the service provided. Of the 34,879 incidents without transport, only 5,859 involved patients who were seen but not transported. All of these patients were selected for study. Of these, 2,975 were successfully contacted, with 2,865 (96.3%) reporting overall satisfaction. The most common reason given for nonsatisfaction in both groups was the perception of a long response time. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to conduct a survey of EMS customer satisfaction using telephone-survey methods. Although difficulties exist in contacting patients, useful information is made available with this method. Such surveys should be an integral part of any EMS system's quality-improvement efforts. In this survey, the overwhelming majority of patients, both transported and not transported, were satisfied with their encounter with EMS.

[1]  P. Paris,et al.  Quality indicators for out-of-hospital emergency medical services: the paramedics' perspective. , 1997, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[2]  D. Persse,et al.  T HE E FFECT OF A Q UALITY I MPROVEMENT F EEDBACK L OOP ON P ARAMEDIC-INITIATED N ONTRANSPORT OF E LDERLY P ATIENTS , 2002, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[3]  B S Zachariah,et al.  Incidence, source, and nature of complaints received in a large, urban emergency medical services system. , 1995, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  Doering Gt Customer care. Patient satisfaction in the prehospital setting. , 1998 .

[5]  Stanley B. Davis,et al.  Quality Management , 2005 .

[6]  Allison L. Harvey,et al.  Actual vs perceived EMS response time. , 1999, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[7]  L. Moore,et al.  Measuring quality and effectiveness of prehospital EMS. , 1999, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[8]  J. Moshinskie Reader Attitudes Toward Journal-Based Continuing Education for EMS Personnel , 1997, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.