Tele-operation of Robot Teams: A Comparison of Gamepad-, Mobile Device and Hand Tracking-Based User Interfaces

Due to the continuous advancements made in robot technologies, the development of intuitive and effective user interfaces for human-robot interaction is getting increasingly important. This paper investigates how different types of interfaces can be used for allowing a single operator to remotely control a team of robots endowed with different capabilities. Attention is focused on three user interfaces based on a gamepad, on a mobile device and on hand tracking, respectively. To evaluate pros and cons of the above interfaces, a user study was conducted, in which participants had to combine the capabilities of a rover, a drone and a robotic arm in order to carry out a search and pick task. Based on the experiments, the fastest way to complete the task was to use the mobile device. However, results showed that some of the interfaces could provide better performances for selected robots and associated sub-tasks. It is worth observing that, despite evidences about efficiency, participants rated the gamepad as the preferred interface from the point of view of subjective usability.

[1]  Enrico Natalizio,et al.  UAV-assisted disaster management: Applications and open issues , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[2]  K. Á. T.,et al.  Towards a tool for the Subjective Assessment of Speech System Interfaces (SASSI) , 2000, Natural Language Engineering.

[3]  Vikram Kapila,et al.  Comparing Interface Elements on a Tablet for Intuitive Teleoperation of a Mobile Manipulator , 2014 .

[4]  Miguel Hernando Gutiérrez,et al.  Hammer: an Android based application for end-user industrial robot programming , 2014 .

[5]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Evaluation of control factors affecting the operator's immersion and performance in robotic teleoperation , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Teleoperation of Multiple Social Robots , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[7]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Haptic interactions with multi-robot swarms using manipulability , 2015, HRI 2015.

[8]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Optimized Assistive Human–Robot Interaction Using Reinforcement Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[9]  Sungchul Kang,et al.  Multi-modal user interface for teleoperation of ROBHAZ-DT2 field robot system , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[10]  James A. Landay,et al.  Drone & me: an exploration into natural human-drone interaction , 2015, UbiComp.

[11]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Three dimensional tangible user interface for controlling a robotic team , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Exploring the use of tangible user interfaces for human-robot interaction: a comparative study , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Derek Anderson,et al.  Using a hand-drawn sketch to control a team of robots , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[14]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Touch and toys: new techniques for interaction with a remote group of robots , 2009, CHI.