The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?1

Abstract Using data obtained from National Opinion Research Center's General Social Surveys (1973–1990), this paper tests two hypotheses concerning possible changes in the sociopolitical correlates of environmental concern. The “broadening base” hypothesis predicts that environmental concern will diffuse throughout the populace, resulting in a broader base of support for environmental protection, while the “economic contingency” hypothesis predicts that the economically deprived will disproportionately withdraw support for environmental protection during poor economic conditions. Analysis of the data over the 18 years, however, failed to lend any clear support for either of the hypotheses. In marked contrast, results indicate that the social bases of environmental concern—at least as measured by the NORC environmental spending item—have remained remarkably stable over nearly two decades despite fluctuating economic, political, and environmental conditions. Younger adults, the well-educated, political liberals, Democrats, those raised and currently living in urban areas, and those employed outside of primary industries were found to be consistently more supportive of environmental protection than were their respective counterparts.

[1]  Sanford Labovitz,et al.  The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories , 1970 .

[2]  F. Buttel,et al.  The Structure of Support for the Environmental Movement, 1968-1970. , 1974 .

[3]  F. Buttel The Environmental Movement: Consensus, Conflict, and Change , 1975 .

[4]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ordinal Variables , 1975, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  J. Christenson,et al.  Support for Economic Growth and Environmental Protection 1973-1975. , 1976 .

[6]  M. R. Hershey,et al.  Is Pollution ‘A White Thing’? Racial Differences in Preadults' Attitudes , 1977 .

[7]  F. Buttel Age and Environmental Concern: A Multivariate Analysis , 1979 .

[8]  T. K. Pinhey,et al.  Public Support for Environmental Protection , 1980 .

[9]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[10]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Environmental Concern , 1981 .

[11]  Lawrence C. Hamilton,et al.  Concern about Toxic Wastes , 1985 .

[12]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Environmentalism and elitism: a conceptual and empirical analysis , 1986 .

[13]  P. Mohai,et al.  AGE AND ENVIRONMENTALISM: AN ELABORATION OF THE BUTTEL MODEL USING NATIONAL SURVEY EVIDENCE , 1987 .

[14]  S. Hays Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Preface , 1987 .

[15]  D. Eckberg,et al.  Environmental issues as women’s issues: General concerns and local hazards , 1989 .

[16]  K. Rasinski,et al.  THE EFFECT OF QUESTION WORDING ON PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT SPENDING , 1989 .

[17]  Dorceta E. Taylor Blacks and the Environment , 1989 .

[18]  Robert D. Bullard,et al.  The quest for environmental equity: Mobilizing the African‐American community for social change , 1990 .

[19]  R. Dunlap,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND PROTECTION , 1991 .

[20]  R. Dunlap Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965–1990 , 1991 .

[21]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Public Opinion in the 1980s Clear Consensus, Ambiguous Commitment , 1991 .

[22]  Shirley Laska,et al.  The Changing Face of the Environmental Coalition , 1992 .

[23]  P. Stern Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. , 1992 .