Design of Personal Rapid Transit Networks for Transit-Oriented Development Cities

Personal rapid transit (PRT) is an automated transit system in which vehicles are sized to transport a batch of passengers on demand to their destinations, by means of nonstop and non-transfer on its own right-of-way. PRT vehicles run exclusively on its tracks, called guideways. The guideways are designed as elevated facilities above the ground, for purpose of eliminating at-grade crossings or interferences with other transportation modes. In the recent planning practice for urban development in future, there has been an increasing and sustained emphasis in the global community in sustainable transportation systems. Transit-oriented development (TOD) has emerged as a promising alternative for sustainable communities by creating compact environments using convenient and efficient public transportation systems. To facilitate TOD development, an alternative to the personal car needs to provide a public transit mode which offers the same door-to-door flexibility at an acceptable cost. This could be achieved through a mixed design of high passenger-flows mass transit and flexible public transportation carrying low passenger-flows for the times or places. PRT is one of such flexible systems serving a supplement mode for the TOD development, where a PRT system functions as a local area network, connecting the traditional transit systems and other means of transit modes within its network. Two major downsides that restrict the PRT in the practical stage are the cost and line capacity. Both the cost and line capacity could be improved through an appropriate guideway network (GN) design, because a well-designed GN not only improves the connectivity and accessibility, but also provides more options in the route choice. This study investigates the methodology of PRT network design, to minimize both guideway construction cost and users’ travel cost. In particular it introduces a set of optional points, known as Steiner points, in the graph to reduce the guideway length. The model is formulated as a combined Steiner problem and assignment problem, and a Lagrangian relaxation based solution algorithm is developed to solve the problem. Numerical studies are carried on a realistic-sized network. The authors show the proposed model and solution algorithm can solve the PRT guideway network effectively.

[1]  Paul Schonfeld,et al.  An Assessment of Trip Times in Automated Guideway Transit Systems , 2014 .

[2]  F. Karray,et al.  Personal Rapid Transit network design using Genetic Algorithm and Ant Colony System hybridization , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

[3]  Michel Parent New Technologies for Sustainable Urban Transportation in Europe , 2006 .

[4]  Martin Lowson New Approach to Effective and Sustainable Urban Transport , 2003 .

[5]  Martin Lowson,et al.  Service Effectiveness of PRT vs Collective - Corridor Transport , 2003 .

[6]  Supin L. Yoder,et al.  Capital Costs and Ridership Estimates of Personal Rapid Transit , 2000 .

[7]  Edward S. Neumann,et al.  The morgantown PRT: It is still running at West Virginia University , 1991 .

[8]  Sunduck D. Suh Korean APM Projects: Status and Prospects , 2001 .

[9]  J E Anderson PERSONAL RAPID TRANSIT: MATCHING CAPACITY TO DEMAND , 1998 .

[10]  Joerg Schweizer,et al.  Comparison of static vehicle flow assignment methods and microsimulations for a personal rapid transit network , 2012 .

[11]  Jen-Jia Lin,et al.  Does Transit-Oriented Development Affect Metro Ridership? , 2008 .

[12]  Sgouris Sgouridis,et al.  Simulation-based analysis of personal rapid transit systems: service and energy performance assessment of the Masdar City PRT case , 2011 .

[13]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  The traveling-salesman problem and minimum spanning trees: Part II , 1971, Math. Program..

[14]  Ingmar Andréasson,et al.  PRT- a High-quality, Cost-efficient and Sustainable Public Transport System forKungens Kurva , 2005 .

[15]  John D. Lees-Miller,et al.  Theoretical Maximum Capacity as Benchmark for Empty Vehicle Redistribution in Personal Rapid Transit , 2010 .

[16]  Jiaqi Ma,et al.  DESIGNING PERSONAL RAPID TRANSIT (PRT) NETWORKS , 1991 .

[17]  Göran Tegnér,et al.  PRT in Sweden: From Feasibility Studies to Public Awareness , 2007 .

[18]  Ingmar Andreasson Reallocation of Empty Personal Rapid Transit Vehicles en Route , 2003 .

[19]  Yan Li,et al.  Transit-Oriented Land Planning Model Considering Sustainability of Mass Rail Transit , 2010 .

[20]  Peter B. Gibbons,et al.  An algorithm for the steiner problem in graphs , 1982, Networks.

[21]  Pawel Winter,et al.  Steiner problem in networks: A survey , 1987, Networks.

[22]  Paul S. Hoffman,et al.  Viability of personal rapid transit in New Jersey , 2007 .

[23]  S. Louis Hakimi,et al.  Steiner's problem in graphs and its implications , 1971, Networks.

[24]  Fakhri Karray,et al.  Guideway Network Design of Personal Rapid Transit System: A Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm Approach , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[25]  Michel Parent,et al.  Low Cost, Trackless PRT , 2001 .

[26]  Torgeir Vaa,et al.  Assessing the Contribution and the Feasibility of a Citywide Personal Rapid Transit System , 2009 .

[27]  Ingmar Andreasson VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION IN LARGE PERSONAL RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[28]  Robert E Johnson Doubling Personal Rapid Transit Capacity with Ridesharing , 2005 .

[29]  S. E. Dreyfus,et al.  The steiner problem in graphs , 1971, Networks.