Relaxing the zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory.

The zero-sum assumption is one of the ingredients of the standard neutral model of biodiversity by Hubbell. It states that the community is saturated all the time, which in this model means that the total number of individuals in the community is constant over time, and therefore introduces a coupling between species abundances. It was shown recently that a neutral model with independent species, and thus without any coupling between species abundances, has the same sampling formula (given a fixed number of individuals in the sample) as the standard model [Etienne, R.S., Alonso, D., McKane, A.J., 2007. The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. J. Theor. Biol. 248, 522-536]. The equilibria of both models are therefore equivalent from a practical point of view. Here we show that this equivalence can be extended to a class of neutral models with density-dependence on the community-level. This result can be interpreted as robustness of the model, i.e. insensitivity of the model to the precise interaction of the species in a neutral community. It can also be interpreted as a lack of resolution, as different mechanisms of interactions between neutral species cannot be distinguished using only a single snapshot of species abundance data.

[1]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  Neutral Community Theory: How Stochasticity and Dispersal-Limitation Can Explain Species Coexistence , 2007 .

[2]  D. Kendall,et al.  On some modes of population growth leading to R. A. Fisher's logarithmic series distribution. , 1948, Biometrika.

[3]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Theoretical biology: Comparing models of species abundance (Reply) , 2006, Nature.

[4]  M. D. Weiser,et al.  Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. , 2006, Ecology.

[5]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests , 2005, Nature.

[7]  W. Ewens.  The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  Salvador Pueyo,et al.  The maximum entropy formalism and the idiosyncratic theory of biodiversity , 2007, Ecology letters.

[9]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Confronting different models of community structure to species-abundance data: a Bayesian model comparison. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[10]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The merits of neutral theory. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  J. Chave,et al.  Theoretical biology: Comparing models of species abundance , 2006, Nature.

[12]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an 'exact' test of neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[13]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The implicit assumption of symmetry and the species abundance distribution. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[14]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[15]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[16]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Rannala,et al.  The Sampling Theory of Neutral Alleles in an Island Population of Fluctuating Size , 1996, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.