On the scalability of microstructured mixing devices

Abstract Microchannel systems for multilamination mixers can be obtained by stacking and bonding microstructured foils. So-called V-type mixers have been manufactured and examined at the Institute for Micro Process Engineering by means of the Iodide Iodate Reaction Method. In previous work we showed that V-type mixers can be scaled by varying the number of micromachined foils and holding constant velocities of the fluids exiting the microchannel system. Applying the Iodide Iodate Reaction Method, constant triiodide concentrations, indicating constant ‘mixing qualities’, were obtained with mixer inlays with 6 foils, 12 foils, and 24 foils. In order to understand the influence of the top- and the bottom foils, which are different regarding their geometrical environment, examinations are presented with mixer inlays with 4 foils and 2 foils. The two newly examined inlays are fully ‘in-line’ with the scaling considerations from the previously examined devices. An influence of the boundary foils cannot be shown. Furthermore, it is shown that the arrangement of the microchannels at the interface between the microchannel system and the mixing chamber (‘shape of the exit window’) has a crucial impact on the mixing results: the larger the width of the exit window, the better the mixing results.

[1]  Laurent Falk,et al.  Performance comparison of micromixers , 2010 .

[2]  K. Schubert,et al.  The iodide iodate method to characterize microstructured mixing devices , 2008 .

[3]  A. Kölbl,et al.  The iodide iodate reaction method: The choice of the acid , 2010 .

[4]  Slobodan Panić,et al.  Experimental approaches to a better understanding of mixing performance of microfluidic devices , 2004 .

[5]  S. M. Ghiaasiaan,et al.  Pressure drop caused by abrupt flow area changes in small channels , 2005 .

[6]  Laurent Falk,et al.  A new parallel competing reaction system for assessing micromixing efficiency—Determination of micromixing time by a simple mixing model , 1996 .

[7]  Laurent Falk,et al.  A new parallel competing reaction system for assessing micromixing efficiency—Experimental approach , 1996 .

[8]  M. Saber,et al.  Microreactor numbering-up in multi-scale networks for industrial-scale applications: Impact of flow maldistribution on the reactor performances , 2010 .

[9]  J. Villermaux,et al.  Characterisation of micromixing efficiency by the iodide–iodate reaction system. Part II: kinetic study , 2000 .

[10]  V. Hessel,et al.  Numbering-up of micro devices: a first liquid-flow splitting unit , 2004 .

[11]  Marko Zlokarnik,et al.  Stirring: Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[12]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Quantitative Estimation of Segregation Indices in CSTR—Effects of Feed Stream and Output Port , 2000 .

[13]  Naoya Kawano,et al.  Radical polymerization using microflow system: Numbering-up of microreactors and continuous operation , 2006 .

[14]  L. Falk,et al.  Characterisation of micromixing efficiency by the iodide–iodate reaction system. Part I: experimental procedure , 2000 .

[15]  V. Hessel,et al.  Determination of the segregation index to sense the mixing quality of pilot- and production-scale microstructured mixers , 2007 .

[16]  J. Bourne Comments on the iodide/iodate method for characterising micromixing , 2008 .