Evaluation of the floaterm concept at marine container terminals via simulation

Abstract International seaborne trade rose significantly during the past decades. This created the need to increase capacity of existing marine container terminals to meet the growing demand. The major objective of this paper is to evaluate the floaterm concept using simulation modeling and determine if it can improve terminal productivity. The main difference between floaterm and conventional marine container terminals is that, in the former case, transshipment containers are handled by off-shore quay cranes and stored on container barges. Two terminal configurations performance is compared (vessel handling times and equipment utilization) under normal and disruptive conditions. Computational experiments confirm preliminary expectations that the floaterm concept can enhance efficiency of marine container terminal operations under normal and disruptive conditions.

[1]  Alfredo Garro,et al.  easyABMS: A domain-expert oriented methodology for agent-based modeling and simulation , 2010, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[2]  Anna Dix,et al.  The Floaterm Concept: Reducing Terminal Congestion with Waterside Cranes , 2007 .

[3]  Mark Goh,et al.  Development and simulation analysis of real-time yard crane control systems for seaport container transshipment terminals , 2009, OR Spectr..

[4]  Chung-Piaw Teo,et al.  Dispatching Automated Guided Vehicles in a Container Terminal , 2005 .

[5]  N. Sharif Mohseni.  Developing a Tool for Designing a Container Terminal Yard , 2011 .

[6]  Fan Liu,et al.  Improving Ship Stability in Automated Stowage Planning for Large Containerships Zeng Min, Malcolm Yoke Hean Low, Wen Jing Hsu, , 2009 .

[7]  Adam Rose,et al.  Measuring Economic Risk Benefits of USCG Marine Safety Programs , 2011 .

[8]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Effect of block length and yard crane deployment systems on overall performance at a seaport container transshipment terminal , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Lawrence Henesey,et al.  Enhancing Container Terminal Performance : A Multi Agent Systems Approach , 2004 .

[10]  Carlos Arango,et al.  Berth allocation planning in Seville inland port by simulation and optimisation , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[11]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Operations research at container terminals: a literature update , 2007, OR Spectr..

[12]  Tom Cherrett,et al.  Study on berth planning problem in a container seaport: Using an integrated programming approach , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  Xiangtong Qi,et al.  Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times , 2012 .

[14]  Matthew E. H. Petering.  Effect of Block Width and Storage Yard Layout on Marine Container Terminal Performance , 2009 .

[15]  Inazio Martinez de Arano,et al.  Global Change , 2012 .

[16]  Qingcheng Zeng,et al.  Models and algorithms for multi-crane oriented scheduling method in container terminals , 2009 .

[17]  Peter Bernard Marlow,et al.  Fourth generation ports – a question of agility? , 2003 .

[18]  Robert J. McCalla,et al.  GLOBAL CHANGE, LOCAL PAIN: INTERMODAL SEAPORT TERMINALS AND THEIR SERVICE AREAS , 1999 .

[19]  Soner Esmemr,et al.  A Simulation for Optimum Terminal Truck Number in a Turkish Port Based on Lean and Green Concept , 2010 .

[20]  Shell Ying Huang,et al.  An Automated Stowage Planning System for Large Containerships , 2009 .

[21]  Maria Boile,et al.  Container Terminal Berth Planning , 2009 .

[22]  M. C. Moura O,et al.  Ship assignment with hub and spoke constraints , 2002 .

[23]  Roberto Musmanno,et al.  A queuing network model for the management of berth crane operations , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[24]  Kees Jan Roodbergen,et al.  Seaside operations in container terminals: literature overview, trends, and research directions , 2015 .

[25]  Wen-Jing Hsu,et al.  An efficient block-based heuristic method for stowage planning of large containerships with crane split consideration , 2009 .

[26]  Athanasios Ballis,et al.  A comparison between conventional and advanced handling systems for low volume container maritime terminals , 1997 .

[27]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  The Berth Allocation Problem in Bulk Ports , 2011 .

[28]  Alan J. Mayne,et al.  Introduction to Simulation and SLAM , 1979 .

[29]  Iris F. A. Vis,et al.  Comparison of vehicle types at an automated container terminal , 2004 .

[30]  H. Ligteringen,et al.  Floating cranes for container handling , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).

[31]  Yvo A. Saanen,et al.  Comparison of three automated stacking alternatives by means of simulation , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[32]  Branislav Dragović,et al.  Dynamic Equipment Deployment at a Container Terminal : Transfer System Based on Real-Time Positioning , 2009 .

[33]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review , 2004, OR Spectr..

[34]  Wen-Jing Hsu,et al.  Simulation-based dynamic partitioning of yard crane workload for container terminal operations , 2009, SpringSim '09.

[35]  Matthew E. H. Petering.  Decision support for yard capacity, fleet composition, truck substitutability, and scalability issues at seaport container terminals , 2011 .

[36]  Liu Fan,et al.  Visualization and Simulation Tool for Automated Stowage Plan Generation System , 2010 .

[37]  Li-feng Xi,et al.  A proactive approach for simultaneous berth and quay crane scheduling problem with stochastic arrival and handling time , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Christian Bierwirth,et al.  A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Paola Zuddas,et al.  Maritime repositioning of empty containers under uncertain port disruptions , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[40]  Matthew E. H. Petering.  Development and simulation analysis of real-time, dual-load yard truck control systems for seaport container transshipment terminals , 2010, OR Spectr..

[41]  Yong Seok Choi,et al.  Simulation-based performance evaluation of transport vehicles at automated container terminals , 2004, OR Spectr..