The effects of using taxi-hailing application on driving performance

Driver distraction has become a major threat to the road safety, and the globally booming taxi-hailing application introduces new source of distraction to drivers. Although various in-vehicle information systems have been studied extensively, no documentation exists objectively measuring the extent to which interacting with taxi-hailing application during driving impacts drivers’ behavior. To fill this gap, a simulator-based study was conducted to synthetically compare the effects that different output modalities (visual, audio, and combined visual–audio) and input modalities (baseline, manual, and speech) imposed on the driving performance. The results show that the visual output introduced more negative effects on driving performance compared to audio output. In the combined output, visual component dominated the effects imposed on the longitudinal control and hazard detection; audio component only exacerbated the negative effects of visual component on the lateral control. Speech input modality was overall less detrimental to driving performance than manual input modality, especially reflected in the drivers’ quicker reaction to hazard events. The visual–manual interaction modality most severely impaired the hazard detecting ability, while also led to strong compensative behaviors. The audio–speech and visual–speech modality associated with more smooth lateral control and faster response to hazard events, respectively, compared to other modality. These results could be applied to improve the design of not only the taxi-hailing application but also other input–output balanced in-vehicle information systems.

[1]  Omer Tsimhoni,et al.  Address Entry While Driving: Speech Recognition Versus a Touch-Screen Keyboard , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task , 1999 .

[3]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The Effects of Text Messaging on Young Drivers , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[4]  P A Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  T. Victor Keeping Eye and Mind on the Road , 2005 .

[6]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  D. Scott McCrickard,et al.  Effect of Information Modality on Geographic Cognition in Car Navigation Systems , 2003, INTERACT.

[8]  John D Lee,et al.  Technology and teen drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[10]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[11]  Su-Jin Lee,et al.  Driver's Distraction and Understandability (EOU) Change Due to the Level of Abstractness and Modality of GPS Navigation Information during Driving , 2014, IHCI.

[12]  Martin Lochner,et al.  Using the Lane-Change Test (LCT) to Assess Distraction: Tests of Visual-Manual and Speech-Based Operation of Navigation System Interfaces , 2017 .

[13]  Omer Tsimhoni,et al.  DESTINATION ENTRY WHILE DRIVING: SPEECH RECOGNITION VERSUS A TOUCH- SCREEN KEYBOARD , 2002 .

[14]  W. Berg,et al.  Effect of the Intensity of Wireless Telephone Conversations on Reaction Time in a Braking Response , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  J C Stutts,et al.  The role of driver distraction in crashes: an analysis of 1995-1999 Crashworthiness Data System Data. , 2001, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[16]  Andrew William Gellatly,et al.  THE USE OF SPEECH RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY IN AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[17]  J Lockhart,et al.  The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[19]  Paul Green,et al.  Examination of a Videotape-Based Method to Evaluate the Usability of Route Guidance and Traffic Information Systems , 1993 .

[20]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Defining Driver Distraction , 2005 .

[21]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Accident Analysis and Prevention , 2009 .

[22]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Effects of Voice Technology on Test Track Driving Performance: Implications for Driver Distraction , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[23]  John D Lee,et al.  Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Driving and Side Task Performance: The Effects of Display Clutter, Separation, and Modality , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[25]  Tibor Petzoldt,et al.  How does a lower predictability of lane changes affect performance in the Lane Change Task? , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Jan E B Törnros,et al.  Mobile phone use-effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  John Vavrik,et al.  Effect of a Concurrent Auditory Task on Visual Search Performance in a Driving-Related Image-Flicker Task , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Driving context and visual-manual phone tasks influence glance behavior in naturalistic driving , 2014 .

[29]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[30]  Georgia Tzamalouka,et al.  Driving performance while using a mobile phone: A simulation study of Greek professional drivers , 2016 .

[31]  Mikael B. Skov,et al.  Studying driver attention and behaviour for three configurations of GPS navigation in real traffic driving , 2010, CHI.

[32]  Erwin R. Boer,et al.  Development of a steering entropy method for evaluating driver workload , 1999 .