A Hybrid Classifier Fusion Approach for Motor Unit Potential Classification During EMG Signal Decomposition

In this paper, we propose a hybrid classifier fusion scheme for motor unit potential classification during electromyographic (EMG) signal decomposition. The scheme uses an aggregator module consisting of two stages of classifier fusion: the first at the abstract level using class labels and the second at the measurement level using confidence values. Performance of the developed system was evaluated using one set of real signals and two sets of simulated signals and was compared with the performance of the constituent base classifiers and the performance of a one-stage classifier fusion approach. Across the EMG signal data sets used and relative to the performance of base classifiers, the hybrid approach had better average classification performance overall. For the set of simulated signals of varying intensity, the hybrid classifier fusion system had on average an improved correct classification rate (CCr) (6.1%) and reduced error rate (Er) (0.4%). For the set of simulated signals of varying amounts of shape and/or firing pattern variability, the hybrid classifier fusion system had on average an improved CCr (6.2%) and reduced Er (0.9%). For real signals, the hybrid classifier fusion system had on average an improved CCr (7.5%) and reduced Er (1.7%).

[1]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  Adaptive certainty-based classification for decomposition of EMG signals , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  Multi-classification techniques applied to EMG signal decomposition , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[3]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Experiments with Classifier Combining Rules , 2000, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[5]  Luís A. Alexandre,et al.  On combining classifiers using sum and product rules , 2001, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Sarbast M. Rasheed,et al.  A Multiclassifier Approach to Motor Unit Potential Classification for EMG Signal Decomposition , 2006 .

[7]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  Data Dependence in Combining Classifiers , 2003, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[8]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  The combining classifier: to train or not to train? , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[9]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust method for estimating motor unit firing-pattern statistics , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Daniel W. Stashuk,et al.  Physiologically based simulation of clinical EMG signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Mohamed Kamel,et al.  Adaptive fuzzy k-NN classifier for EMG signal decomposition. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  Dr. D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: an analysis of its behavior and performance , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.