China Interventional Stroke Registry: Rationale and Study Design

Background: Angioplasty and stenting have recently become attractive options for cerebral large artery stenosis in China. However, there are limited data on safety and long-term outcomes in Chinese patients having undergone cerebral interventional procedures. To address this need, we set up a common database - the China Interventional Stroke Registry (CISR) - to describe patient characteristics, interventional images, periprocedural complications and long-term clinical outcomes and to determine how adherence to guideline-based treatments in the ‘real world' works in China. Methods: Six medical centers have participated since 2004. They entered into an Internet-based database data on demographics, clinical history and angiography of patients undergoing angioplasty with/without stenting in extracranial arteries (carotid, vertebral and subclavian arteries) and/or intracranial arteries (middle cerebral artery, vertebral artery and basilar artery) in China. CISR is a research-funded project. Results: As of October 2012, we have already collected detailed clinical information on 1,356 patients (age: 63.6 ± 10.2 years, male: 1,084, 79.9%). The overall data quality is good. Site data quality control is supported via detailed monthly feedback reports and quarterly data monitoring meetings. Conclusions: The CISR is the first and the largest registry for angioplasty with/without stents in China. The database will provide the characteristics and outcomes of patients and the situation of adherence to guideline-based treatments under ‘real-world' conditions in China.

[1]  T. Leung,et al.  Have Medical Therapy and Stenting Been Fairly Compared? A Repercussion upon Termination of Recruitment in the SAMMPRIS Trial , 2011, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[2]  V. Mok,et al.  Lesion Patterns and Stroke Mechanisms in Concurrent Atherosclerosis of Intracranial and Extracranial Vessels , 2009, Stroke.

[3]  R. Higashida,et al.  Reporting standards for angioplasty and stent-assisted angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerosis. , 2009, Stroke.

[4]  Michael D Hill,et al.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Ming Liu,et al.  Stroke in China: epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[6]  M. Hartmann,et al.  A Novel, Self-Expanding, Nitinol Stent in Medically Refractory Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenoses: The Wingspan Study , 2007, Stroke.

[7]  L. Wong Global Burden of Intracranial Atherosclerosis , 2006, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[8]  R. Sacco,et al.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. , 1995, Stroke.

[9]  Sean I. Savitz,et al.  Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis , 2012 .

[10]  K. Wong,et al.  Long-Term Mortality and Recurrent Stroke Risk Among Chinese Stroke Patients With Predominant Intracranial Atherosclerosis , 2003, Stroke.

[11]  P. Meyers,et al.  Standard of practice: endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis , 2012, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[12]  K. Furie,et al.  Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. , 2008, Stroke.

[13]  K. Wong,et al.  Racial distribution of intracranial and extracranial atherosclerosis , 2003, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  T. Bajwa,et al.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Mark D. Johnson,et al.  Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  W. Hacke,et al.  30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[18]  Xavier Ducrocq,et al.  Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Gelin Xu,et al.  Chinese Guidelines for Endovascular Management of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Diseases , 2013, Interventional Neurology.

[20]  D. Leys,et al.  Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  H. A. Smith,et al.  A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  Julien Bogousslavsky,et al.  The Global Stroke Initiative , 2004, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Use of Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound to Predict Outcome in Patients With Intracranial Large-Artery Occlusive Disease , 2000, Stroke.

[24]  Gary Friday,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideline , 2011, Circulation.

[25]  M. Marks Is there a future for endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease after Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke and Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS)? , 2012, Stroke.