Maintaining Consistency between Self-Serving Beliefs and Available Data

It was hypothesized that individuals evaluate data relevant to outcome attributions in a manner that enables them to maintain logical consistency between the available evidence and their self-serving attributions for the outcome. Subjects were led to succeed or fail on a bogus social sensitivity test and then were given information concerning two studies, one of which concluded that the test was valid and the other that the test was not valid. As predicted, success subjects evaluated the high-validity conclusion study more favorably and the low-validity conclusion study less favorably than did failure subjects. Furthermore, exposure to the mixed evidence after the performance feedback led to increased selt-ratings of social sensitivity among success subjects, but had no effect on failure subjects. The implications of these results for understanding how individuals generate and maintain self-serving beliefs were discussed.

[1]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[2]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate , 1982 .

[3]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Affect as a mediator of attributional egotism , 1981 .

[4]  M. L. Snyder,et al.  Poor performance following unsolvable problems: Learned helplessness or egotism? , 1978 .

[5]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory , 1979 .

[6]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Misattribution of arousal and the effects of self-threatening information , 1980 .

[7]  Dieter Frey,et al.  The effect of negative feedback about oneself and cost of information on preferences for information about the source of this feedback. , 1981 .

[8]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[9]  M. Ross,et al.  Facilitation of ego-biased attributions by means of self-serving observer feedback. , 1977 .

[10]  G. W. Bradley.  Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[11]  E. E. Jones,et al.  DRUG CHOICE AS A SELF-HANDICAPPING STRATEGY IN RESPONSE TO NONCONTINGENT SUCCESS , 1978 .

[12]  N. Kuiper,et al.  Depression and causal attributions for success and failure. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The effects of feedback about self and others on the recall and judgments of feedback-relevant information ☆ , 1983 .

[14]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Social comparison after success and failure: Biased search for information consistent with a self-serving conclusion , 1985 .

[15]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Affect as a determinant of egotism: Residual excitation and performance attributions , 1982 .

[16]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .