Identification of reference multi criteria domain model - Production line optimization case study

Abstract The methods of multi-criteria decision analysis are widely used for problems of selecting the best solution or ordering their sets. In the vast majority of cases, solving multi-criteria decision-making problems focuses on finding solutions for a given set of alternatives. When, for one or more decisional variants, the values of their attributes change, or a new alternative for assessment appears, the problem occurs. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on identifying the full decision-making model in the issue related to the study case of production line optimization. In this work, the Characteristic Objects METhod (COMET) has been applied. In effect, it identifies the full decision-making model. The decision problem has been identified, taking into account six decision criteria, and its operation has been used in organizing four decision alternatives.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[2]  Michel Beuthe,et al.  Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Nabil Nahas,et al.  Buffer allocation and preventive maintenance optimization in unreliable production lines , 2017, J. Intell. Manuf..

[4]  Wojciech Sałabun,et al.  A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management , 2020, Energies.

[5]  Andrzej Piegat,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome , 2016, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[6]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Group Decision-Making for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Based on Characteristic Objects Method , 2017, Symmetry.

[7]  Jaroslaw Jankowski,et al.  Identification of a Multi-criteria Assessment Model of Relation Between Editorial and Commercial Content in Web Systems , 2016, MISSI.

[8]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Using the COMET Method in the Sustainable City Transport Problem: an Empirical Study of the Electric Powered Cars , 2018, KES.

[9]  Andrzej Piegat,et al.  Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for Assessing the Severity of Chronic Liver Disease , 2015, ICAISC.

[10]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[11]  Christoph Jan Bartodziej.  The concept Industry 4.0 , 2017 .

[12]  Raik Stolletz,et al.  The buffer allocation problem in production lines: Formulations, solution methods, and instances , 2018, IISE Trans..

[13]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Maut — Multiattribute Utility Theory , 2005 .

[14]  Tabasam Rashid,et al.  A New Method to Support Decision-Making in an Uncertain Environment Based on Normalized Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers and COMET Technique , 2020, Symmetry.

[15]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Decision Making with Uncertainty Using Hesitant Fuzzy Sets , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[16]  Wojciech Sałabun,et al.  The Characteristic Objects Method: A New Distance‐based Approach to Multicriteria Decision‐making Problems , 2015 .

[17]  Jawad Ali,et al.  Intuitionistic-Fuzzy Goals in Zero-Sum Multi Criteria Matrix Games , 2017, Symmetry.

[18]  Hicham Boukhriss,et al.  Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[19]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection: Rule set database and exemplary decision support system implementation blueprints , 2018, Data in brief.

[20]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Guideline for MCDA Method Selection in Production Management Area , 2016 .