Strength, Functional Outcome, and Postural Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postural stability, single-leg hop, and isokinetic strength measurements in subjects after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with an age- and activity-matched control group. DESIGN AND SETTING: Subjects reported to a sports medicine/athletic training research laboratory for testing. Subjects reported for one testing session for a total test time of 1 hour. SUBJECTS: Twenty subjects with ACL reconstructions (ACLRs) and 20 age- and activity-matched controls were selected to participate in this study. An arthroscopically assisted central one-third bone-patellar tendon procedure was used to repair the ACLs. MEASUREMENTS: We measured concentric and eccentric peak torque (Nm) measurements of the knee extensors and flexors at 120 degrees and 240 degrees /second on an isokinetic dynamometer. Unilateral and bilateral dynamic postural stability was measured as a stability index in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral planes with the Biodex Stability System. We tested single-leg hop for distance to measure objective function. RESULTS: We found no significant difference between the ACLR and control subjects for stability index or knee-flexion peak torque scores. On the single-leg hop for distance, the ACLR subjects hopped significantly shorter distances with the involved limb than the uninvolved limb. Furthermore, the ACLR subjects' single-leg hop distance was significantly less when the involved limb was compared with the control-group matched involved limb, and the ACLR subjects performed significantly better when the uninvolved limb was compared with the control-group matched uninvolved limb. The ACLR subjects produced significantly greater torque in the uninvolved leg than in the involved leg. In addition, the peak torque was significantly less for the involved limb in the ACLR group when compared with the matched involved limb of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: After ACLR (mean = 18 +/- 10 months), single-leg hop-for-distance scores and quadriceps strength were not within normal limits when compared with the contralateral limb. Our results suggest that bilateral and single-limb postural stability in the ACLR group was not significantly different than the control group at an average follow-up of 18 months after surgery.

[1]  A. Ekeland,et al.  Prospective study of changes in impairments and disabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1999, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[2]  H. Tropp,et al.  Factors affecting stabilometry recordings of single limb stance , 1984, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Nerve supply of the human knee and its functional importance , 1982, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  M. Axe,et al.  1998 Basmajian Student Award Paper: Movement patterns after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a comparison of patients who compensate well for the injury and those who require operative stabilization. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  D S Barrett,et al.  Joint proprioception in normal, osteoarthritic and replaced knees. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  M Rennison,et al.  Open versus closed chain kinetic exercises after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study. , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  R. Arriaza-Loureda An electromyographic analysis of the knee during functional activities. , 1995, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Louis R. Osternig,et al.  Knee Joint Proprioception Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1992 .

[9]  M. Paterno,et al.  Relationship of knee extensor strength and hopping test performance in the assessment of lower extremity function. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[10]  Randy J. Schmitz,et al.  Intertester and intratester reliability of a dynamic balance protocol using the Biodex Stability System , 1998 .

[11]  L. Nashner,et al.  Dynamic posturography in the diagnosis and management of dizziness and balance disorders. , 1990, Neurologic clinics.

[12]  K. M. Singer,et al.  Long-term evaluation of knee stability and function following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency , 1988, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  K. Takagi,et al.  A Stabilometric Technique for Evaluation of Functional Instability in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-deficient Knee , 1992 .

[14]  K. Pfeifer,et al.  Motor performance in different dynamic tests in knee rehabilitation , 1999, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[15]  K E Wilk,et al.  The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[16]  S. Hurwitz,et al.  Lower extremity compensations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[17]  F R Noyes,et al.  Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  Christopher D. Harner,et al.  Proprioception Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1992 .

[19]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Dale M. Daniel,et al.  Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  J M Medeiros,et al.  Assessment of quadriceps/hamstring strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 1988, The American journal of sports medicine.

[22]  L. Hiemstra,et al.  Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Functional Testing in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament‐Deficient Knee , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  M. Hoffman,et al.  An investigation of postural control in postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients. , 1999, Journal of athletic training.

[25]  D Glencross,et al.  Position sense following joint injury. , 1981, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[26]  K. Wilk,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation: A 12-Week Follow-Up of Isokinetic Testing in Recreational Athletes , 1991 .

[27]  A. Nitz,et al.  Review of the afferent neural system of the knee and its contribution to motor learning. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[28]  P. Goldie,et al.  Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[30]  H. Skinner,et al.  Proprioception in the anterior cruciate deficient knee , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[31]  Harry B. Skinner,et al.  Knee Joint Proprioception Revisited , 1994 .

[32]  F. Noyes,et al.  Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  H. Skinner,et al.  Effect of articular disease and total knee arthroplasty on knee joint-position sense. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  E. Harrison,et al.  Evaluation of single-leg standing following anterior cruciate ligament surgery and rehabilitation. , 1994, Physical therapy.