Left ventricular longitudinal systolic function analysed by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis

Background The purpose of this meta-analysis was to confirm if the global longitudinal systolic function of the left ventricle (LV) is altered in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We searched in different databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) studies that analysed LV global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) in patients with HFpEF and in controls (such as healthy subjects or asymptomatic patients with arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus or coronary artery disease). Results Twenty-two studies (2284 patients with HFpEF and 2302 controls) were included in the final analysis. Patients with HFpEF had significantly lower GLS than healthy subjects (mean −15.7% (range −12% to −18.9%) vs mean −19.9% (range −17.1% to −21.5%), weighted mean difference −4.2% (95% CI −3.3% to −5.0%), p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with HFpEF had also significantly lower GLS than asymptomatic patients (mean −15.5% (range −13.4% to −18.4%) vs mean −18.3% (range −15.1% to −20.4%), weighted mean difference −2.8%(95% CI −1.9% to −3.6%), p < 0.001, respectively). In line, 10 studies showed that the rate of abnormal GLS was significantly higher in patients with HFpEF (mean 65.4% (range 37%–95%)) than in asymptomatic subjects (mean 13% (range 0%–29.6%)). Regarding the prognostic relevance of abnormal GLS in HFpEF, two multicentre studies with large sample size (447 and 348) and high number of events (115 and 177) showed that patients with abnormal GLS had worse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes than those with normal GLS (HR for CV mortality and HF hospitalisation 2.14 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.66) and 1.94 (95% CI 1.22 to 3.07)), even adjusting these analyses for multiples clinical and echocardiographic variables. Conclusion The present meta-analysis analysing 2284 patients with HFpEF and 2302 controls confirms that the longitudinal systolic function of the LV is significantly altered in high proportion of patients with HFpEF. Further large multicentre studies with the aim to confirm the prognostic role of abnormal GLS in HFpEF are warranted.

[1]  L. Ling,et al.  Right ventricular dysfunction in left‐sided heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[2]  M. Macdonald,et al.  Prognostic Factors After Index Hospitalization for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  The associations among co-morbidity, cardiac geometries and mechanics in hospitalized heart failure with or without preserved ejection fraction , 2017, Clinical and experimental hypertension.

[4]  J. Daubert,et al.  Importance of combined left atrial size and estimated pulmonary pressure for clinical outcome in patients presenting with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  W. Haverkamp,et al.  Normal range and usefulness of right ventricular systolic strain to detect subtle right ventricular systolic abnormalities in patients with heart failure: a multicentre study , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[6]  Michael E. Hall,et al.  Presence and Implication of Temporal Nonuniformity of Early Diastolic Left Ventricular Wall Expansion in Patients With Heart Failure. , 2016, Journal of Cardiac Failure.

[7]  M. Takeuchi,et al.  Relation Between Echocardiogram-Based Cardiac Parameters and Outcome in Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2016, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Cury,et al.  An observational study of the association among interatrial adiposity by computed tomography measure, insulin resistance, and left atrial electromechanical disturbances in heart failure , 2016, Medicine.

[9]  G. Alunni,et al.  Fibrosis assessment by integrated backscatter and its relationship with longitudinal deformation and diastolic function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction , 2016, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[10]  David A. Klein,et al.  Prognostic Utility and Clinical Significance of Cardiac Mechanics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Importance of Left Atrial Strain , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  T. Marwick,et al.  Contributions of Nondiastolic Factors to Exercise Intolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Effects of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors on mortality, hospitalization, and diastolic function in patients with HFpEF , 2016, Herz.

[13]  L. Pourafkari,et al.  Systolic Longitudinal Function of the Left Ventricle Assessed by Speckle Tracking in Heart Failure Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction , 2015, The journal of Tehran Heart Center.

[14]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  Prognostic Importance of Impaired Systolic Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and the Impact of Spironolactone , 2015, Circulation.

[15]  L. Lund,et al.  New echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcome in patients presenting with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a subanalysis of the Ka (Karolinska) Ren (Rennes) Study , 2015, European journal of heart failure.

[16]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data: The PRISMA-IPD Statement , 2015 .

[17]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from the RELAX trial , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[18]  F. Messerli,et al.  Beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis , 2015, Heart Failure Reviews.

[19]  J. Sanderson,et al.  Left ventricular long-axis performance during exercise is an important prognosticator in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[20]  D. Mann,et al.  Speckle Strain Echocardiography Predicts Outcome in Patients with Heart Failure with both Depressed and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction , 2015, Echocardiography.

[21]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Is mechanical dyssynchrony a therapeutic target in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? , 2014, American heart journal.

[22]  Fang Fang,et al.  What can three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography contribute to evaluate global left ventricular systolic performance in patients with heart failure? , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[23]  Milton Packer,et al.  Impaired systolic function by strain imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Arash Kheradvar,et al.  Contrast echocardiography for assessing left ventricular vortex strength in heart failure: a prospective cohort study. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[25]  M. Obokata,et al.  Incremental diagnostic value of la strain with leg lifts in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[26]  K. Takigiku,et al.  Normal range of left ventricular 2-dimensional strain: Japanese Ultrasound Speckle Tracking of the Left Ventricle (JUSTICE) study. , 2012, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[27]  Rainer Dietz,et al.  Left atrial systolic and diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[28]  Patric Biaggi,et al.  Comparison of Two Different Speckle Tracking Software Systems: Does the Method Matter? , 2011, Echocardiography.

[29]  B. Yan,et al.  Resting global and regional left ventricular contractility in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction: insights from speckle-tracking echocardiography , 2010, Heart.

[30]  W. Hoffmann,et al.  Global strain rate imaging for the estimation of diastolic function in HFNEF compared with pressure-volume loop analysis. , 2010, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[31]  W. Tsai,et al.  Evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction detected by automated function imaging in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2009, Journal of cardiac failure.

[32]  M. Frenneaux,et al.  Left ventricular torsion and strain patterns in heart failure with normal ejection fraction are similar to age-related changes. , 2009, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[33]  Yu Ting Tan,et al.  The pathophysiology of heart failure with normal ejection fraction: exercise echocardiography reveals complex abnormalities of both systolic and diastolic ventricular function involving torsion, untwist, and longitudinal motion. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  Wolfgang Hoffmann,et al.  Role of Left Ventricular Stiffness in Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction , 2008, Circulation.

[35]  Jianwen Wang,et al.  Preserved left ventricular twist and circumferential deformation, but depressed longitudinal and radial deformation in patients with diastolic heart failure. , 2007, European heart journal.

[36]  D. Kitzman,et al.  Contribution of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction to heart failure regardless of ejection fraction. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[37]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Diastolic heart failure--abnormalities in active relaxation and passive stiffness of the left ventricle. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  J. Cleland,et al.  Global longitudinal strain in patients with suspected heart failure and a normal ejection fraction: does it improve diagnosis and risk stratification? , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.