MR imaging of the breast in patients with positive margins after lumpectomy: influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE Postsurgical contrast enhancement resulting from inflammatory changes at the site of surgery limits the accuracy of MR imaging of the breast in diagnosing residual breast cancer. This study was undertaken to evaluate the influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging on the diagnosis of residual breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-eight patients who had undergone excisional biopsy with positive resection margins underwent MR imaging for evaluation of residual breast cancer and possible breast conservation. Patients were retrospectively stratified according to the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging. Dynamic and morphologic enhancement features were used for lesion characterization. Imaging findings were correlated with results of histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for patients waiting 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after initial surgery before undergoing MR imaging of the breast. RESULTS The time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging of the breast had the greatest influence on the specificity and negative predictive value of MR imaging, increasing progressively over time. A plateau of highest values of 75% specificity and 86% negative predictive value was reached at 28 and 35 days after surgery, respectively. Although the sensitivity and positive predictive value showed smaller variations over time, peak values of 95% sensitivity and 92% positive predictive value were obtained at 35 and 28 days after surgery, respectively. CONCLUSION We recommend scheduling patients with positive resection margins no earlier than 28 days after initial surgery for evaluation of residual cancer using MR imaging of the breast.

[1]  N M Hylton,et al.  Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  G. Vlastos,et al.  MR imaging: breast cancer staging and screening. , 2001, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[3]  E A Sickles,et al.  Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[5]  D. Fraker,et al.  Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[6]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Detection with MR imaging of residual tumor in the breast soon after surgery. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  F. Vicini,et al.  Pathologic and mammographic findings predicting the adequacy of tumor excision before breast-conserving therapy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  E. Rosato,et al.  Factors associated with a positive reexcision after excisional biopsy for invasive breast cancer. , 1995, Surgery.

[9]  M D Schnall,et al.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. , 1995, Radiology.

[10]  C. Lee,et al.  Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  S. Heywang-Köbrunner,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[12]  B. Eisenberg,et al.  Incidence of Gross and Microscopic Carcinoma in Specimens from Patients with Breast Cancer After Re‐Excision Lumpectomy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[13]  S. Heywang-Köbrunner,et al.  Contrast‐Enhanced MRI of the Breast after Limited Surgery and Radiation Therapy , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  L. Liberman,et al.  Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. , 1993, Radiology.

[15]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Feasibility of breast‐conservation surgery after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma , 1992, Cancer.

[16]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. , 1992, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  D. Schultz,et al.  The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  B Fisher,et al.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  K. Scanlan,et al.  Mammographic evaluation of the postsurgical and irradiated breast. , 1988, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[20]  S. Hellman,et al.  Limited resection for breast cancer: a study of inked specimen margins before radiotherapy. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Pathologic findings on re‐excision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy , 1987, Cancer.