Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences

Although storytelling often has negative connotations within science, narrative formats of communication should not be disregarded when communicating science to nonexpert audiences. Narratives offer increased comprehension, interest, and engagement. Nonexperts get most of their science information from mass media content, which is itself already biased toward narrative formats. Narratives are also intrinsically persuasive, which offers science communicators tactics for persuading otherwise resistant audiences, although such use also raises ethical considerations. Future intersections of narrative research with ongoing discussions in science communication are introduced.

[1]  Michael F. Dahlstrom,et al.  Influence of Evidence Type and Narrative Type on HPV Risk Perception and Intention to Obtain the HPV Vaccine , 2015, Health communication.

[2]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet’s potential for closing them , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[3]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Yarden Katz.  Against storytelling of scientific results , 2013, Nature Methods.

[5]  D. Brossard.  New media landscapes and the science information consumer , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  D. Kirby.  Forensic fictions: science, television production, and modern storytelling. , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[7]  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher,et al.  All Stories Are Not Alike , 2013, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  Michael F. Dahlstrom,et al.  Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science , 2012 .

[9]  D. Kahan.  Why we are poles apart on climate change , 2012, Nature.

[10]  Michael F. Dahlstrom.  The Persuasive Influence of Narrative Causality: Psychological Mechanism, Strength in Overcoming Resistance, and Persistence Over Time , 2012 .

[11]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[12]  S. Hopfer.  Effects of a Narrative HPV Vaccination Intervention Aimed at Reaching College Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, Prevention Science.

[13]  Thomas A. Morton,et al.  Communicating climate science: The role of perceived communicator’s motives. , 2012 .

[14]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Science on Television in the 21st Century , 2011, Commun. Res..

[15]  Randy J. McCarthy,et al.  You're getting warmer: Level of construal affects the impact of central traits on impression formation. , 2011 .

[16]  M. Galesic,et al.  Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  Frank Renkewitz,et al.  The Influence of Narrative v. Statistical Information on Perceiving Vaccination Risks , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  Michael F. Dahlstrom.  The Role of Causality in Information Acceptance in Narratives: An Example From Science Communication , 2010, Commun. Res..

[19]  Michael A. Shapiro,et al.  Science Information in Fictional Movies: Effects of Context and Gender , 2010 .

[20]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Diversity of Television Exposure and its Association with the Cultivation of Concern for Environmental Risks , 2010 .

[21]  S. Klassen,et al.  The Relation of Story Structure to a Model of Conceptual Change in Science Learning , 2010 .

[22]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Embodiment, evolution, and social cognition: An integrative framework , 2009 .

[23]  Rosemary Randall,et al.  Loss and Climate Change: The Cost of Parallel Narratives , 2009 .

[24]  Lucy Avraamidou,et al.  The Role of Narrative in Communicating Science , 2009 .

[25]  Ariel Malka,et al.  The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Mark Conner,et al.  Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[27]  Helena Bilandzic,et al.  Transportation and Transportability in the Cultivation of Genre-Consistent Attitudes and Estimates , 2008 .

[28]  M. Bucchi,et al.  Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology , 2008 .

[29]  Rick W. Busselle,et al.  Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement , 2008 .

[30]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Effects of using online narrative and didactic information on healthcare participation for breast cancer patients. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[31]  Joann L. Baril,et al.  Patient education about anticoagulant medication: is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective? , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[32]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Using Narrative Communication as a Tool for Health Behavior Change: A Conceptual, Theoretical, and Empirical Overview , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[33]  Markus Appel,et al.  Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase Over Time , 2007 .

[34]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application , 2007, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[35]  J. Pielke,et al.  The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[36]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[37]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Narratives and Cancer Communication , 2006 .

[38]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? , 2006, Public Health Genomics.

[39]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science , 2005 .

[40]  J. Besley,et al.  Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology , 2005 .

[41]  K. Weigmann.  The code, the text and the language of God , 2004, EMBO reports.

[42]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan.  The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .

[43]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Learning facts from fiction. , 2003 .

[44]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[45]  T. Brock.  How Does the Mind Construct and Represent Stories , 2003 .

[46]  M. Slater,et al.  Entertainment—Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[47]  David Dickson,et al.  Weaving a social web , 2001, Nature.

[48]  Stephen D. Reese,et al.  The Roots of a Sociology of News: Remembering Mr. Gates and Social Control in the Newsroom , 2001 .

[49]  K. McComas,et al.  Environmental Content in Prime-Time Network TV's Non-News Entertainment and Fictional Programs , 2001 .

[50]  Pamela J. Shoemaker,et al.  Individual and Routine Forces in Gatekeeping , 2001 .

[51]  Martin Kreiswirth.  Merely Telling Stories? Narrative and Knowledge in the Human Sciences , 2000 .

[52]  D. McQuail.  McQuail's Mass Communication Theory , 2000 .

[53]  Shalom M. Fisch,et al.  A Capacity Model of Children's Comprehension of Educational Content on Television , 2000 .

[54]  K. Zabrucky,et al.  INFLUENCE OF TEXT GENRE ON ADULTS' MONITORING OF UNDERSTANDING AND RECALL , 1999 .

[55]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Why Fiction May be Twice as True as Fact: Fiction as Cognitive and Emotional Simulation , 1999 .

[56]  J. J. Strange,et al.  How Anecdotal Accounts in News and in Fiction Can Influence Judgments of a Social Problem’s Urgency, Causes, and Cures , 1999 .

[57]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Beyond 2000: science/biology education for the future , 1999 .

[58]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Risk communication, public participation and the Seveso II directive , 1999 .

[59]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Exemplification Theory: Judging the Whole by Some of Its Parts , 1999 .

[60]  J. Shanahan,et al.  Telling Stories About Global Climate Change , 1999 .

[61]  G. Gerbner.  Telling Stories, or How Do We Know What We Know? The Story of Cultural Indicators and the Cultural Environment Movement , 1998 .

[62]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Exaggerated Versus Representative Exemplification in News Reports , 1994 .

[63]  R. Curtis.  Narrative Form and Normative Force: Baconian Story-Telling in Popular Science , 1994 .

[64]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading , 1993 .

[65]  N. Polsby.  Where Do You Get Your Ideas? , 1993, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[66]  H. White,et al.  Trusting the Tale: The Narrativist Turn in the Human Sciences* , 1992 .

[67]  J. Bruner.  The Narrative Construction of Reality , 1991, Critical Inquiry.

[68]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal relatedness and importance of story events , 1985 .

[69]  J. Bruner.  Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[70]  W. Fisher.  Narration As a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument , 1984 .

[71]  W. Fisher.  The Narrative Paradigm: in the Beginning , 1984 .

[72]  Joan B. Levine,et al.  The Feminine Routine , 1976 .

[73]  L. Gross,et al.  Living with television: the violence profile. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[74]  J. Galtung,et al.  The Structure of Foreign News , 1965 .

[75]  Ursula Dresdner.  Biomedical Communications Purposes Audiences And Strategies , 2016 .

[76]  Rachel Cunningham,et al.  Telling stories of vaccine-preventable diseases: why it works. , 2013, South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association.

[77]  Michael F. Dahlstrom,et al.  Communication strategies for earning trust in climate change debates , 2013 .

[78]  F. Badenschier,et al.  Issue Selection in Science Journalism: Towards a Special Theory of News Values for Science News? , 2012 .

[79]  R. C. Elliott,et al.  The Medialization of Regenerative Medicine: Frames and Metaphors in UK News Stories , 2012 .

[80]  Michael F. Dahlstrom,et al.  The Problem of Communicating Beyond Human Scale , 2012 .

[81]  Mihail C. Roco.  National Nanotechnology Initiative , 2012 .

[82]  J. Monteagudo.  Jerome Bruner and the challenges of the narrative turn: Then and now , 2011 .

[83]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion , 2010 .

[84]  Bärbel Garsoffky,et al.  Narrative-based learning: Possible benefits and problems , 2009 .

[85]  Ken Baake,et al.  Metaphor and Knowledge: The Challenges of Writing Science , 2003 .

[86]  Brent A. Olde,et al.  How does the mind construct and represent stories , 2002 .

[87]  V. Rideout,et al.  Communicating health information through the entertainment media. , 2001, Health affairs.

[88]  E M Rogers,et al.  Entertainment-education and HIV/AIDS prevention: a field experiment in Tanzania. , 2000, Journal of health communication.

[89]  Jon D. Miller,et al.  Public perceptions of science and technology : a comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada , 1997 .

[90]  R. Schank,et al.  Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story , 1995 .

[91]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .