Citizen energy lost in sustainability transitions: Knowledge co-production in a complex governance context

[1]  J. Lukkarinen,et al.  Transitions in planning: transformative policy visions of the circular economy and blue bioeconomy meet planning practice , 2022, European Planning Studies.

[2]  J. Wittmayer,et al.  Biting the bullet: Addressing the democratic legitimacy of transition management , 2022, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[3]  Thomas Bauwens,et al.  Conceptualizing community in energy systems: A systematic review of 183 definitions , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[4]  J. Lukkarinen,et al.  Actor roles and practices in energy transitions , 2022, Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region.

[5]  P. Pinson,et al.  A network-aware market mechanism for decentralized district heating systems , 2022, Applied Energy.

[6]  M. Gjefsen,et al.  Unraveling the politics of ‘doing inclusion’ in transdisciplinarity for sustainable transformation , 2021, Sustainability Science.

[7]  Rebecca L. Gruby,et al.  Six modes of co-production for sustainability , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[8]  Bríd Walsh,et al.  Energy citizenship in the Netherlands: The complexities of public engagement in a large-scale energy transition , 2021 .

[9]  M. Sahakian,et al.  Challenging social norms to recraft practices: A Living Lab approach to reducing household energy use in eight European countries , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[10]  C. Hoicka,et al.  Implementing a Just Renewable Energy Transition: Policy Advice for Transposing the New European Rules for Renewable Energy Communities , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  S. Eloneva,et al.  Renovation realities: Actors, institutional work and the struggle to transform Finnish energy policy , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[12]  Arun Narayanan,et al.  From private to public governance: The case for reconfiguring energy systems as a commons , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[13]  Christina Demski,et al.  Energy justice discourses in citizen deliberations on systems flexibility in the United Kingdom: Vulnerability, compensation and empowerment , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[14]  M. van Buuren,et al.  Regional design ateliers on ‘energy and space’: systemic transition arenas in energy transition processes , 2020, European Planning Studies.

[15]  Audley Genus,et al.  Transforming the energy system? Technology and organisational legitimacy and the institutionalisation of community renewable energy , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[16]  Petteri Repo,et al.  Network analysis of energy transition arena experiments , 2020 .

[17]  D. Reiner,et al.  Diverse community energy futures in Saskatchewan, Canada , 2020, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[18]  L. Schwarz.  Empowered but powerless? Reassessing the citizens’ power dynamics of the German energy transition , 2020 .

[19]  I. Ruostetsaari.  From consumers to energy citizens: Finns’ readiness for demand response and prosumerism in energy policy making , 2020, International Journal of Energy Sector Management.

[20]  Campos Inês,et al.  Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU , 2020 .

[21]  Michiel A. Heldeweg,et al.  Renewable energy communities as ‘socio-legal institutions’: A normative frame for energy decentralization? , 2020 .

[22]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Transformative policy mixes in socio-technical scenarios: The case of the low-carbon transition of the German electricity system (2010–2050) , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[23]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[24]  Sampsa Hyysalo,et al.  Devices and strategies: An analysis of managing complexity in energy retrofit projects , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[25]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Community versus local energy in a context of climate emergency , 2019, Nature Energy.

[26]  S. Hyysalo,et al.  The difficult process of adopting a comprehensive energy retrofit in housing companies: Barriers posed by nascent markets and complicated calculability , 2019, Energy Policy.

[27]  J. Jokisalo,et al.  Towards the EU emissions targets of 2050: optimal energy renovation measures of Finnish apartment buildings , 2019, International Journal of Sustainable Energy.

[28]  P. Wells,et al.  An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions , 2019, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[29]  J. Lukkarinen,et al.  Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for Mid-range Planning , 2019, Sustainability.

[30]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: New empirical and conceptual insights , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[31]  P. Upham,et al.  Collaborative energy visioning under conditions of illiberal democracy: results and recommendations from Ecuador , 2018, Energy, Sustainability and Society.

[32]  Hilary Bradbury,et al.  Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[33]  Darren McCauley,et al.  Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change , 2018, Energy Policy.

[34]  N. Dunphy,et al.  Participative environmental policy integration in the Irish energy sector , 2018 .

[35]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Creating energy citizenship through material participation , 2018, Social studies of science.

[36]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Technical skills, disinterest and non-functional regulation: Barriers to building energy efficiency in Finland viewed by energy service companies , 2018 .

[37]  Kacper Szulecki.  Conceptualizing energy democracy , 2018 .

[38]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view , 2017 .

[39]  Teresa Haukkala.  A struggle for change—The formation of a green-transition advocacy coalition in Finland , 2017, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[40]  David Lazarevic,et al.  Client-oriented evaluation of ‘creative destruction’ in policy mixes: Finnish policies on building energy efficiency transition , 2017 .

[41]  P. Strachan,et al.  Rescaling the Governance of Renewable Energy: Lessons from the UK Devolution Experience , 2017 .

[42]  Mari Martiskainen,et al.  Energy Internet forums as acceleration phase transition intermediaries , 2017, Research Policy.

[43]  N. Schäpke,et al.  Linking Transitions to Sustainability: A Study of the Societal Effects of Transition Management , 2017 .

[44]  Audley Genus,et al.  Sustainable energy projects and the community: Mapping single-building use of microgeneration technologies in London , 2016 .

[45]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  A transition scenario for leapfrogging to a sustainable urban water future in Port Vila, Vanuatu , 2016 .

[46]  Sabine Hielscher,et al.  Making the most of community energies: Three perspectives on grassroots innovation , 2016 .

[47]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Heat pumps in Denmark - From ugly duckling to white swan , 2015 .

[48]  D. Loorbach,et al.  See no evil, hear no evil: The democratic potential of transition management , 2015 .

[49]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  The local community as a “low-carbon lab”: Promises and perils , 2015 .

[50]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach , 2014, AMBIO.

[51]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  User-led innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies , 2013 .

[52]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations , 2013 .

[53]  D. Lang,et al.  A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science , 2013 .

[54]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets , 2012 .

[55]  B. Truffer,et al.  Market Formation in Technological Innovation Systems—Diffusion of Photovoltaic Applications in Germany , 2011 .

[56]  Robin Roy,et al.  Adoption and Use of Household Microgeneration Heat Technologies , 2010 .

[57]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change , 2010 .

[58]  C. Hendriks,et al.  Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management , 2009 .

[59]  C. Pohl,et al.  Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research , 2006 .

[60]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  Transition Management: A Reflexive Governance Approach , 2006 .

[61]  H. Rohracher.  The Role of Users in the Social Shaping of Environmental Technologies , 2003 .

[62]  Teis Hansen,et al.  Community Energy in the Eastern Baltic Sea Region: From Standstill to First Steps , 2021, Renewable Energy Communities and the Low Carbon Energy Transition in Europe.

[63]  M. Giezen,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Opening up the transition arena: An analysis of (dis)empowerment of civil society actors in transition management in cities , 2019 .

[64]  D. Loorbach.  Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[65]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Energy Citizenship: Psychological Aspects of Evolution in Sustainable Energy Technologies , 2007 .