The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Feature and conjunction searches have been argued to delineate parallel and serial operations in visual processing. The authors evaluated this claim by examining the temporal dynamics of the detection of features and conjunctions. The 1st experiment used a reaction time (RT) task to replicate standard mean RT patterns and to examine the shapes of the RT distributions. The 2nd experiment used the response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure to measure discrimination (asymptotic detection accuracy) and detection speed (processing dynamics). Set size affected discrimination in both feature and conjunction searches but affected detection speed only in the latter. Fits of models to the SAT data that included a serial component overpredicted the magnitude of the observed dynamics differences. The authors concluded that both features and conjunctions are detected in parallel. Implications for the role of attention in visual processing are discussed.

[1]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[2]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Eckstein.  The Lower Visual Search Efficiency for Conjunctions Is Due to Noise and not Serial Attentional Processing , 1998 .

[4]  B. McElree,et al.  Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. , 1998 .

[5]  B. McElree,et al.  Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .

[6]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  M Carrasco,et al.  “Transient structures”: The effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  The temporal relationship among detection, localization, and identification in visual search , 1997 .

[9]  M. Fahle,et al.  Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[11]  MARISA CARRASCO,et al.  Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[12]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[13]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  M Carrasco,et al.  The interaction of objective and subjective organizations in a localization search task , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Palmer.  Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[16]  R A Kinchla,et al.  Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited? , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  W. Geisler,et al.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search. , 1995, Psychological review.

[18]  B. McElree,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence for a Temporal Dissociation , 1995 .

[19]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Stimulus discriminability in visual search , 1994, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Palmer.  Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[23]  J. Townsend,et al.  Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: An evaluative review , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  B. McElree,et al.  The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension , 1993 .

[25]  G. Sperling,et al.  Information transfer in iconic memory experiments. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control , 1993 .

[29]  M. Cheal,et al.  Benefits from attention depend on the target type in location-precued discrimination. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[30]  A. Treisman.  Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  B Julesz,et al.  The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Limitations on the Parallel Guidance of Visual Search : Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation Conjuctions , 2004 .

[34]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Sensitivity To Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual Search , 1990 .

[35]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  S. Yantis,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[38]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[39]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[42]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  R Klein,et al.  Search performance without eye movements , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[45]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[46]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[48]  B. Dosher,et al.  Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory , 1989 .

[49]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[51]  Charles Folk,et al.  Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. , 1989 .

[52]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[54]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Visual Information-Processing in the Perception of Features and Objects , 1988 .

[55]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[56]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1988, Psychological review.

[57]  H. Pashler.  Target-distractor discriminability in visual search , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  Burkhart Fischer,et al.  THE ROLE OF ATTENTION IN THE PREPARATION OF VISUALLY GUIDED SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENTS IN MAN , 1987 .

[60]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[61]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[62]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. , 1984 .

[64]  W. Hockley.  Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. , 1984 .

[65]  F. Crick.  Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[68]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[69]  Marilyn L Shaw,et al.  Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[70]  B. Dosher.  Effect of Sentence Size and Network Distance on Retrieval Speed. , 1982 .

[71]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Tests of serial scanning in item recognition. , 1982 .

[73]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The effects of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[74]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  J E Hoffman,et al.  A two-stage model of visual search , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[77]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[79]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[80]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Semantic Memory Retrieval: Analysis by Speed Accuracy Tradeoff Functions* , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[81]  J E Hoffman,et al.  Search through a sequentially presented visual display , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[82]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[83]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[84]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[85]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[86]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[87]  A. V. Reed,et al.  List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[88]  S. Sternberg.  Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[89]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model , 1974 .

[90]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[91]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[92]  David I. Mostofsky,et al.  Attention and Performance III , 1971 .

[93]  B. Murdock.  A parallel-processing model for scanning , 1971 .

[94]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[95]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays , 1970 .

[96]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[97]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[98]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[99]  H. Woodrow.  The measurement of attention , 1914 .

[100]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[101]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .