An industry approach to shared, cross-organisational engineering change handling - The road towards standards for product data processing

Abstract Standards for cross-enterprise communication between systems that actively manage product data and which control the associated workflows–including release and approval processes–have been in industrial use for some time. Experiences gained during the last decade showed that purely data centric approaches, such as supported by IGES, ISO 10303 (STEP) and IFC are not sufficient. Cross-enterprise communication requires not only agreements about data format and semantics, but also about orderly procedures for efficient communication between the stakeholders in a workflow. This paper presents the background and approach taken for the development of a standard for cross-company engineering change management (ECM), which is currently undertaken as a joint activity between VDA (German Association of the Automotive Industry) and ProSTEP iViP (international association for information integration in industry). Based on the results of this joint activity, which was recently published as SASIG ECM Recommendation V2.0 and as VDA 4965 V3.0, ECM Pilot implementations within member companies were conducted. They proved that a lead-time reduction of the engineering change process of 20%–40% is possible while the quality of the process increases. The approach itself should work not only in engineering change or product data environments, but also in document oriented environments as well as in sectors other than automotive. The ECM standard provides specifications of reference business processes, including the definition of the participants’ roles and the interaction and synchronization (“touch”) points where data are communicated. It leverages and builds on other established product data standards wherever possible. Thus, the data model defined by STEP AP214, (Core Data for automotive mechanical design processes) is used to describe the “payload”–i.e. the product data content to be exchanged–at defined synchronization points. OMG’s PLM Services provide the framework for sending messages between the stakeholders of an Engineering Change, and business process modelling languages such as e.g. BPEL (Business Process Execution Language), standardized by OASIS, provide the capability to execute the ECM protocol’s specification. They ensure the ability to use the latest state-of-the-art internet technologies such as XML and web-services.

[1]  I. C. Wright,et al.  A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design , 1997 .

[2]  Anna van Raaphorst OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) , 2006 .

[3]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[4]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries , 1999 .

[5]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Managing New Product and Process Development: Text and Cases , 1992 .

[6]  C. Terwiesch,et al.  Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development , 1999 .

[7]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Current practice of engineering change management in Hong Kong manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[8]  Michel Tollenaere,et al.  Performances in Engineering Changes Management , 2003 .

[9]  Chris A McMahon,et al.  International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering , 2004 .

[10]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Design change and complexity , 2005 .

[11]  Sharon J. Kemmerer,et al.  STEP: The Grand Experience , 1999 .

[12]  Bhuiyan Nadia,et al.  Engineering change request management in a new product development process , 2006 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[14]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  On Architecting and Implementing a Product Information Sharing Service , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[15]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Computer aids for engineering change control , 1998 .

[16]  Hyung Jun Ahn,et al.  Capturing and reusing knowledge in engineering change management: A case of automobile development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[17]  Jan Juerging,et al.  Engineering Change Orders influencing manufacturing start-ups in the automobile industry , 2007 .

[18]  Vassilis Christophides,et al.  Querying the Semantic Web with RQL , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Six Sigma and Beyond: Design for Six Sigma , 2004 .