On the making of service recommendations: An action theory based on utility, reputation, and risk attitude

In the current service-oriented economy, professional workforce and service personnel have to make not only reasonable but also personalized recommendations in response to individual customer's query. These actions affect not only the likelihood that the customer takes the recommendations in a short-term but also the service provider's reputation in a long run because often more risky recommendations may provide more utility but failures have a negative impact to reputation. As different customers have different risk attitudes, they have different trade-off between the service providers' reputation and the recommendations' utilities. Therefore, the classical decision model considering only the utility is inadequate. We reconsider the problem of making recommendations from multiple perspectives, including also reputation and risk attitude. Based on this model, we propose an action theory to explain how service providers can act effectively at the strategic, tactical, and operations level, particularly through personalized recommendations.

[1]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Socially Conscious Decision-Making , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[2]  Michael Luck,et al.  Coalition formation through motivation and trust , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[3]  C. Sierra,et al.  REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies , 2001 .

[4]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[5]  C. Castelfranchi,et al.  Social Trust : A Cognitive Approach , 2000 .

[6]  C. Shapiro.  Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations , 1983 .

[7]  Ho-fung Leung,et al.  Honesty, Trust, and Rational Communication in Multiagent Semi-competitive Environments , 2003, PRIMA.

[8]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Detecting deception in reputation management , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[9]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Trust in information sources as a source for trust: a fuzzy approach , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[10]  Dickson K. W. Chiu,et al.  Making personalized recommendations to customers in a service-oriented economy: a quantitative model based on reputation and risk attitude , 2005, ICEC '05.

[11]  José M. Molina López,et al.  A fuzzy model of reputation in multi-agent systems , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[12]  Nha Nguyen,et al.  Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers` retention decisions in services , 2001 .

[13]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Managing Brand Equity , 1991 .

[14]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  Toward a theory of honesty and trust among communicating autonomous agents , 1993 .

[15]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  Ratings in Distributed Systems: A Bayesian Approach , 2002 .

[16]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[17]  Anne S. York,et al.  Framing information to enhance corporate reputation: The impact of message source, information type, and reference point , 2004 .

[18]  C. Fleisher,et al.  Building a reputation along the value chain at Levi Strauss , 1995 .

[19]  Ho-fung Leung,et al.  A Trust/Honesty Model in Multiagent Semi-competitive Environments , 2004, PRIMA.

[20]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept , 1994 .

[21]  L. Mui,et al.  A computational model of trust and reputation , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Lik Mui,et al.  Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems: a review , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[23]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[24]  David Davies,et al.  Risk Management - Protecting Reputation: Reputation Risk Management - The Holistic Approach , 2002, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..