High frequency distraction improves tissue adaptation during leg lengthening in humans

The present study investigates the effect of distraction frequency on the development of tensile force in the tissues during lengthening. Two patients with bilateral Ilizarov leg lengthening underwent distraction with high frequency in one leg and low frequency in the other. The clinical situation represented a unique model for investigating the effect of distraction frequency, as each individual served as its own control. Both patients had double level lengthening. Distraction frequency at the proximal lengthening zone was 0.25 mm × 4 in the first leg and 1/1440 mm once every minute in the other. Total diurnal distraction at the proximal metaphysis was 1 mm in both legs. In addition, a distal metaphyseal distraction of 0.25 mm × 3 daily was performed on each leg. The tissue's mechanical response was monitored by measuring the tensile force at the proximal osteotomy. Both patients experienced a significant lower level of force during the high frequency lengthening. The lower level of force was concluded to be due to improved soft tissue adaptation, rather than reduced bone regeneration. Accordingly, high distraction frequency was considered favourable to low frequency, and is recommended in large lengthenings where high force levels are expected. © 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  A. Simpson,et al.  The forces which develop in the tissues during leg lengthening , 1996 .

[2]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J L Cunningham,et al.  The forces which develop in the tissues during leg lengthening. A clinical study. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  J. Leong,et al.  Viscoelastic behavior of tissue in leg lengthening by distraction. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  J Aronson,et al.  Mechanical forces as predictors of healing during tibial lengthening by distraction osteogenesis. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  J. Kenwright,et al.  Force-displacement behaviour of biological tissue during distraction osteogenesis. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  J B Morrison,et al.  Femoral forces during limb lengthening in children. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  O. Reikerås,et al.  Tissue response during monofocal and bifocal leg lengthening in patients , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  K. Takagi,et al.  Distraction frequency and the gastrocnemius muscle in tibial lengthening. Studies in rabbits. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  K. Takagi,et al.  Tibial nerve function during tibial lengthening. Measurement of nerve conduction and blood flow in rabbits. , 1995, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  M Evans,et al.  A method of examining the magnitude and origin of "soft" and "hard" tissue forces resisting limb lengthening. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  M. Makarov,et al.  Histomorphometry of Distraction Osteogenesis in a Caprine Tibial Lengthening Model , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  D. Paley,et al.  Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  J. Huard,et al.  Limb lengthening promotes muscle growth , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  M. Makarov,et al.  Effect of Rhythm and Level of Distraction on Muscle Structure: An Animal Study , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .