The UK land cover map 2000: Planning, construction and calibration of a remotely sensed, user-oriented map of broad habitats

Land cover map 2000 (LCM2000) is a comprehensive survey of UK broad habitats giving vector digital maps from segment-based classification of remotely sensed satellite data. This paper examines the influence of users in designing LCM2000 and the difficulties in applying a user-defined classification. It assesses problems and successes through comparisons with a sample-based field survey. These suggest that LCM2000 accuracy at broad habitat level may be around 80–85%; however, it was not possible fully to discriminate errors in LCM2000 from those of the field survey or from mismatches in scales, resolutions and survey dates. Calibration generated broad habitat cover statistics from LCM2000 data to field survey equivalence. These take full account of the heterogeneity of a study area, helping to generate accurate statistics, including those at local level where the field survey cannot operate effectively. The paper concludes that the comprehensive and extensive coverage from remote sensing comes closer than alternative methods to meeting users needs. However, it recognises that producers of remotely sensed information need to understand better the needs of users, and users need to appreciate what the technology can and cannot deliver. This paper adds some benefits of hindsight to the process of communication.

[1]  R. Fuller.  The changing extent and conservation interest of lowland grasslands in England and Wales: A review of grassland surveys 1930–1984 , 1987 .

[2]  A. Cropper.  Convention on Biological Diversity , 1993, Environmental Conservation.

[3]  R. Hill,et al.  The UK Land Cover Map 2000: Construction of a Parcel-Based Vector Map from Satellite Images , 2002 .

[4]  Robin Fuller,et al.  Comparison of land cover definitions , 1994 .

[5]  D. Richard Cutler,et al.  Assessing map accuracy in a remotely sensed, ecoregion-scale cover map , 1998 .

[6]  H. Thunnissen,et al.  THE NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE OF THE NETHERLANDS , 2000 .

[7]  G. B. Groom,et al.  The Availability of Landsat TM images of Great Britain , 1994 .

[8]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Spatial variability in classification accuracy of agricultural crops in the Dutch national land-cover database , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  M. V. Prosser,et al.  Countryside Survey 2000 Quality Assurance Exercise. Report to Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merlewood Research Station. Second draft , 1999 .

[10]  P. Loveland,et al.  The sensitivity of surface waters of Great Britain to acidification predicted from catchment characteristics. , 1995, Environmental pollution.

[11]  B. Devereux,et al.  An efficient image segmentation algorithm for landscape analysis , 2004 .

[12]  A. Jones,et al.  The Land Cover Map of Great Britain: an automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data , 1994 .

[13]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Global and regional land cover characterization from satellite data: an introduction to the Special Issue , 2000 .

[14]  B. Wyatt,et al.  Countryside survey from ground and space: different perspectives, complementary results , 1998 .

[15]  A. J. W. De Wit,et al.  Efficiency and accuracy of per-field classification for operational crop mapping , 2004 .

[16]  Robin Fuller,et al.  Land Cover Map 2000 and Meta‐data at the Land Parcel Level , 2001 .

[17]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Uncertainty in remote sensing and GIS , 2002 .

[18]  R. Fuller,et al.  A comparison of land cover types in an ecological field survey in Northern England and a remotely sensed land cover map of Great Britain , 1995 .

[19]  Geoff Smith,et al.  The characterisation and measurement of land cover change through remote sensing: problems in operational applications? , 2003 .

[20]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Integrating land-cover data with different ontologies: identifying change from inconsistency , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[21]  A. Comber,et al.  Actor–network theory: a suitable framework to understand how land cover mapping projects develop? , 2003 .

[22]  M. K. Gillespie,et al.  Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside. , 2000 .

[23]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[24]  M. B. Usher,et al.  Ecological Change in the Uplands. , 1989 .

[25]  Robin Fuller,et al.  The Use of Classified Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper Imagery in the Characterization of Landscape Composition: a Case Study in Northern England , 1994 .

[26]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[27]  A. Comber,et al.  Assessment of a Semantic Statistical Approach to Detecting Land Cover Change Using Inconsistent Data Sets , 2004 .

[28]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[29]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a 2001 National land-cover database for the United States , 2004 .

[30]  R. Fuller,et al.  Statistical problems in the discrimination of land cover from satellite images : a case study in lowland Britain , 1992 .

[31]  F. Henderson,et al.  Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar , 1998 .

[32]  J. Cihlar.  Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: Status and research priorities , 2000 .