Fronto-tectal white matter connectivity mediates facilitatory effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on visual detection

The causal ability of pre-target FEF activity to modulate visual detection for perithreshold stimuli has been recently demonstrated in humans by means of non-invasive neurostimulation. Yet in spite of the network-distributed effects of these type of techniques, the white matter (WM) tracts and distant visual nodes contributing to such behavioral impact remain unknown. We hereby used individual data from a group of healthy human subjects, who received time-locked pulses of active or sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to the right Frontal Eye Field (FEF) region, and experienced increases in visual detection sensitivity. We then studied the extent to which interindividual differences in visual modulation might be dependent on the WM patterns linking the targeted area to other regions relevant for visuo-attentional behaviors. We report a statistically significant correlation between the probability of connection in a right fronto-tectal pathway (FEF-Superior Colliculus) and the modulation of visual sensitivity during a detection task. Our findings support the potential contribution of this pathway and the superior colliculus in the mediation of visual performance from frontal regions in humans. Furthermore, we also show the ability of a TMS/DTI correlational approach to contribute to the disambiguation of the specific long-range pathways driving network-wide neurostimulatory effects on behavior, anticipating their future role in guiding a more efficient use of focal neurostimulation.

[1]  V. Walsh,et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visual Search: Regional Segregations within the Frontal Eye Fields and Effective Connectivity of the Superior Colliculus , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Shipp The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Modulation of the Contrast Response Function by Electrical Microstimulation of the Macaque Frontal Eye Field , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[6]  Peter W Dicke,et al.  Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Romain Quentin,et al.  Manipulation of Pre-Target Activity on the Right Frontal Eye Field Enhances Conscious Visual Perception in Humans , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visual Perception and Attention , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[10]  David L. Sparks,et al.  Movement selection in advance of action in the superior colliculus , 1992, Nature.

[11]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A Parametric fMRI Study of Overt and Covert Shifts of Visuospatial Attention , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  W. Fries Cortical projections to the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: A retrograde study using horseradish peroxidase , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  Kwang-Hyuk Lee,et al.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[14]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Opposite impact on 14C-2-deoxyglucose brain metabolism following patterns of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the posterior parietal cortex , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Dorsal posterior parietal rTMS affects voluntary orienting of visuospatial attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  D. Guitton,et al.  The effect of frontal eye field stimulation on unit activity in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1974, Brain research.

[17]  Michael Erb,et al.  Exploring the visual world: The neural substrate of spatial orienting , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  M. Catani,et al.  Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts , 2012, Cortex.

[19]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Brain networks of visuospatial attention and their disruption in visual neglect , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Stimulation of the human frontal eye fields modulates sensitivity of extrastriate visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye ®eld Facilitates Visual Awareness , 2022 .

[22]  Tony Ro,et al.  Locating the Human Frontal Eye Fields With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[23]  M. A. Basso,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Activity in Superior Colliculus by Changes in Target Probability , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  V. Walsh,et al.  State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  David Ress,et al.  Topography of covert visual attention in human superior colliculus. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Effects of Sustained Spatial Attention in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Superior Colliculus , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Individual Differences in White-Matter Microstructure Reflect Variation in Functional Connectivity during Choice , 2007, Current Biology.

[29]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  R Gattass,et al.  Responses of cells in the superior colliculus during performance of a spatial attention task in the macaque. , 1996, Revista brasileira de biologia.

[31]  J W McClurkin,et al.  The visual superior colliculus and pulvinar. , 1989, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[32]  L A Krubitzer,et al.  Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys II. cortical connections , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  Laure Zago,et al.  Functional asymmetries revealed in visually guided saccades: an FMRI study. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Right Hemisphere Dominance during Spatial Selective Attention and Target Detection Occurs Outside the Dorsal Frontoparietal Network , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Bruce,et al.  Topography of projections to posterior cortical areas from the macaque frontal eye fields , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity , 2002, Vision Research.

[38]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Composition and topographic organization of signals sent from the frontal eye field to the superior colliculus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[41]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field , 1996, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[42]  D. Salat,et al.  Choice reaction time performance correlates with diffusion anisotropy in white matter pathways supporting visuospatial attention. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Uri Eden,et al.  Biophysical foundations underlying TMS: Setting the stage for an effective use of neurostimulation in the cognitive neurosciences , 2009, Cortex.

[44]  T. Kammer,et al.  Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[46]  Paolo Bartolomeo,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Parietal Contributions to Spatial Orienting in the Human Brain , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Basser,et al.  In vivo fiber tractography using DT‐MRI data , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[49]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  The cortical motor threshold reflects microstructural properties of cerebral white matter , 2008, NeuroImage.

[50]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex on metabolic brain activity: a 14C-2DG tracing study in the cat , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  L A Krubitzer,et al.  Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys II. cortical connections , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[53]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. IV. Effects of lesions on eye movements. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  M. Schlag-Rey,et al.  How the frontal eye field can impose a saccade goal on superior colliculus neurons. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  G. Leichnetz,et al.  The prefrontal corticotectal projection in the monkey; An anterograde and retrograde horseradish peroxidase study , 1981, Neuroscience.

[56]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons , 2000, Neuron.

[57]  Derek K. Jones Challenges and limitations of quantifying brain connectivity in vivo with diffusion MRI , 2010 .

[58]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[59]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[60]  R. Desimone,et al.  Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4 , 2003, Neuron.

[61]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons , 2000, Neuron.

[62]  T. Moore,et al.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[66]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Noninvasive human brain stimulation. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[67]  C. Weiller,et al.  Structural connectivity for visuospatial attention: significance of ventral pathways. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. II. Effect of attention on neuronal responses. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.