Why Violence SpreadsThe Contagion of International Terrorism

This study examines the spread of international terrorism from 1968 to 1974. Using Poisson and negative binomial probability models, a diffusion of international terrorism was found in the first segment of the time period (1968–1971) and contagion as a direct modeling process in the second (1973–1974). Accordingly, the theory of hierarchies in which the diplomatic status of a country predicts its degree of imitability was found to operate among Latin American countries during the second portion of the overall period, but not during the first. An inverse hierarchy is suggested as an explanation for the contagion of violence from Latin America and other third world countries to Western Europe. Autocorrelation functions were used to assess which forms of terrorism were most contagious in which regions.

[1]  Paul Wilkinson,et al.  Terrorism and the Liberal State , 1977 .

[2]  Herbert H. Hyman,et al.  Readings in reference group theory and research , 1969 .

[3]  R. Crelinsten,et al.  A Time of Terror: How Democratic Societies Respond to Revolutionary Violence.@@@Terrorism and Criminal Justice.@@@Repression and Repressive Violence. , 1978 .

[4]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[5]  Norman F. Washburne,et al.  The Reference Other Orientation: An Extension of the Reference Group Concept. , 1973 .

[6]  Alan Marsh Protest and political consciousness , 1977 .

[7]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[8]  Jack L. Walker The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[9]  R. Turner The public perception of protest. , 1969, American sociological review.

[10]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Patterns of Representation in National Capitals and Intergovernmental Organizations , 1967, World Politics.

[11]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  A Guide to Probability Theory and Application , 1974 .

[12]  B. Jenkins,et al.  International Terrorism: A Chronology, 1968-1974 , 1975 .

[13]  William R. Thompson,et al.  The "Coup Contagion" Hypothesis , 1975 .

[14]  J. Coleman Introduction to Mathematical Sociology , 1965 .

[15]  J. Doob Stochastic processes , 1953 .

[16]  J. Urry Reference Groups And The Theory Of Revolution , 1973 .

[17]  M. Midlarsky Mathematical Models of Instability and a Theory of Diffusion , 1970 .

[18]  W. Feller On a General Class of "Contagious" Distributions , 1943 .

[19]  M. Midlarsky,et al.  Analyzing Diffusion and Contagion Effects: The Urban Disorders of the 1960s , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[20]  M. Greenwood,et al.  An Inquiry into the Nature of Frequency Distributions Representative of Multiple Happenings with Particular Reference to the Occurrence of Multiple Attacks of Disease or of Repeated Accidents , 1920 .

[21]  James Durbin,et al.  The fitting of time series models , 1960 .

[22]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[23]  R. Inglehart The Silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics , 1977 .

[24]  Eliza S. Homer,et al.  Galton's Problem in Cross-National Research , 1976, World Politics.

[25]  Bowman H. Miller,et al.  Profile of a terrorist , 1977 .

[26]  David Collier,et al.  Prerequisites Versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption , 1975, American Political Science Review.