Field efficacy of four insect repellent products against vector mosquitoes in a tropical environment.

Four insect repellent products (RPs) (RP 1, Experimental Repellent Lotion [Bayrepel 12%]; RP 2, Experimental Repellent Cream [Bayrepel 5%]; RP 3, Off! Insect Repellent II Aerosol [deet 15%]; and RP 4, Off! Skintastic II Cream [deet 7.5%]) were evaluated simultaneously for their efficacy against vector and nuisance mosquitoes. The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of RPs based on a new repellent compound, Bayrepel (1-piperidinecarboxylic acid, 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-methylpropylester), with deet (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide)-based RPs. An 8-h field efficacy of above repellents was evaluated against the day-biting mosquito (Aedes albopictus) and night-biting mosquitoes (Culex quinquefasciatus and Anopheles spp.). Evaluation was carried out by exposing humans with repellent-treated bare limbs to mosquitoes landing and to mosquitoes landing and biting. Repellent product 1 or 2 was applied on the left arm and leg, whereas RP 3 or 4 was applied on the right arm and leg, respectively. Application of these 4 RPs significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the landing and the landing and biting of day-biting and night-biting mosquitoes. All 4 RPs were found to be equally effective (P < 0.05) against Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus. However, for protection against Anopheles spp., RPs 1 and 3 exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) better repellency effect than RPs 2 and 4.

[1]  J. Mccall,et al.  Pharmacokinetics, formulation, and safety of insect repellent N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet): a review. , 1998, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[2]  R. Wirtz,et al.  Field evaluation of arthropod repellents, deet and a piperidine compound, AI3-37220, against Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya. , 1996, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[3]  J. Trigg Evaluation of a eucalyptus-based repellent against Anopheles spp. in Tanzania. , 1996, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[4]  K. Linthicum,et al.  Effectiveness of repellent formulations containing deet against mosquitoes in northeastern Thailand. , 1996, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[5]  V. Sharma,et al.  Repellency of Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) flowers against Aedes mosquitoes. , 1996, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[6]  Osimitz Tg,et al.  The present safety assessment of deet. , 1995 .

[7]  T G Osimitz,et al.  The present safety assessment of deet. , 1995, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[8]  R. Gupta,et al.  Role of repellents in vector control and disease prevention. , 1994, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[9]  J W Lipscomb,et al.  Seizure following brief exposure to the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide. , 1992, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  B. A. Leonhardt,et al.  Efficacy assessment of Quwenling, a mosquito repellent from China. , 1991, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[11]  M. Perich,et al.  Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. , 1991, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[12]  R. Wirtz,et al.  Comparative sensitivity of four Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) to five repellents. , 1991, Journal of medical entomology.

[13]  C. Schreck,et al.  Repellents and other personal protection strategies against Aedes albopictus. , 1989, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[14]  L. C. Rutledge,et al.  Comparative sensitivity of mosquito species and strains to the repellent diethyl toluamide. , 1978, Journal of medical entomology.

[15]  M. Barzeev,et al.  Evaluation of mosquito repellents. , 1971 .