The influence of pre- and intraoperative positioning of the condyle in the centre of the articular fossa on the position of the disc in orthognathic surgery. A magnetic resonance study.

OBJECTIVE We investigated the changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible for orthognathic surgery and the influence of positioning of the condylar process in the centre of the articular fossa before and during the operation for preventing changes in the TMJ postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN A total of 28 patients with mandibular retrognathism had bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement. In one group of 14 patients (28 TMJ), the condyles were placed in the centre of the articular fossa before and during the operation, and in the other group they were not. Differences on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were calculated and the results were evaluated. RESULTS The main differences were found at maximal mouth opening. 15/28 TMJs (54%) that had not been positioned changed the position of the disc from physiological to anterior disc derangement with and without reduction postoperatively. In the 28 that had been positioned, changes were found in only 3 TMJs (11%) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Fixing the condylar process in the centre of the articular fossa intraoperatively before bilateral sagittal split osteotomy is a factor in preventing postoperative structural changes in the temporomandibular joint.

[1]  A. Athanasiou,et al.  Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after orthognathic surgery. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.

[2]  K. Ueki,et al.  Plate fixation after mandibular osteotomy. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  P. Westesson,et al.  Temporomandibular joint: comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy. , 1987, Radiology.

[4]  O. Hadjianghelou,et al.  Condylar displacement after sagittal splitting of the mandibular rami. A short-term radiographic study. , 1980, Journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  J. V. Van Sickels,et al.  Condylar resorption after bicortical screw fixation of mandibular advancement. , 1998, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  M. Iwase,et al.  Positional changes in the mandibular condyle and amount of mouth opening after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid or nonrigid osteosynthesis. , 1997, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[7]  A. P. Zimmermann,et al.  Surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  R P Langlais,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of postsurgical condylar displacement after mandibular osteotomy. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  A. Gaggl,et al.  Changes in the dimensions of milled mandibular models after mandibular sagittal split osteotomies. , 1998, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  L. Heffez,et al.  Chronic, progressive limitation of mouth opening. , 1998, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  S. Matteson,et al.  Short-term changes of condylar position after sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[12]  S. Lindauer,et al.  Condylar positional changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  W. Roberts,et al.  A comparative study of temporomandibular symptoms following mandibular advancement by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: rigid versus nonrigid fixation. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[14]  K. Kurita,et al.  Minimizing displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric cases. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[15]  J. V. Van Sickels,et al.  Factors influencing condylar position after the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy fixed with bicortical screws. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  H. Sailer,et al.  The role of a posteriorly inclined condylar neck in condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[17]  C. Martis,et al.  The TMJ dysfunction syndrome before and after sagittal split osteotomy of the rami. , 1985, Journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[18]  J. Schenck,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint meniscus. , 1985, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[19]  K Tanne,et al.  Reconsideration of the TMJ condylar position during internal derangement: comparison between condylar position on tomogram and degree of disk displacement on MRI. , 1999, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[20]  F. Joosten.  MR — Tomographie temporomandibulargelenk , 1994 .