Sparse Representations Are Most Likely to Be the Sparsest Possible

Given a signal and a full-rank matrix with, we define the signal's overcomplete representations as all satisfying. Among all the possible solutions, we have special interest in the sparsest one—the one minimizing. Previous work has established that a representation is unique if it is sparse enough, requiring. The measure stands for the minimal number of columns from that are linearly dependent. This bound is tight—examples can be constructed to show that with or more nonzero entries, uniqueness is violated. In this paper we study the behavior of overcomplete representations beyond the above bound. While tight from a worst-case standpoint, a probabilistic point of view leads to uniqueness of representations satisfying. Furthermore, we show that even beyond this point, uniqueness can still be claimed with high confidence. This new result is important for the study of the average performance of pursuit algorithms—when trying to show an equivalence between the pursuit result and the ideal solution, one must also guarantee that the ideal result is indeed the sparsest.

[1]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  M. Kibuuka KING'S COLLEGE, LONDON , 1932, British medical journal.

[3]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Sparse representations in unions of bases , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  On the Optimality of the Backward Greedy Algorithm for the Subset Selection Problem , 2000, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[5]  Balas K. Natarajan,et al.  Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear Systems , 1995, SIAM J. Comput..

[6]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Quantitative Robust Uncertainty Principles and Optimally Sparse Decompositions , 2004, Found. Comput. Math..

[7]  J. Tropp JUST RELAX: CONVEX PROGRAMMING METHODS FOR SUBSET SELECTION AND SPARSE APPROXIMATION , 2004 .

[8]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Jean-Jacques Fuchs,et al.  On sparse representations in arbitrary redundant bases , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  V. Temlyakov Greedy Algorithms andM-Term Approximation with Regard to Redundant Dictionaries , 1999 .

[12]  Michael Elad,et al.  A generalized uncertainty principle and sparse representation in pairs of bases , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Designing structured tight frames via an alternating projection method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  A. Edelman Eigenvalues and condition numbers of random matrices , 1988 .

[17]  Anders Björner,et al.  Some matroid inequalities , 1980, Discret. Math..

[18]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[19]  S. Muthukrishnan,et al.  Approximation of functions over redundant dictionaries using coherence , 2003, SODA '03.

[20]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[21]  E. Candès,et al.  New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities , 2004 .

[22]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Sparse image representation via combined transforms , 1999 .

[23]  Vladimir N. Temlyakov,et al.  Weak greedy algorithms[*]This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant DMS 9970326 and by ONR Grant N00014‐96‐1‐1003. , 2000, Adv. Comput. Math..

[24]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[25]  S. Mallat,et al.  Adaptive greedy approximations , 1997 .

[26]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  GRASSMANNIAN FRAMES WITH APPLICATIONS TO CODING AND COMMUNICATION , 2003, math/0301135.

[27]  Michael Elad,et al.  Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  S. Muthukrishnan,et al.  Improved sparse approximation over quasiincoherent dictionaries , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[29]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[30]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Jianhong Shen On the singular values of Gaussian random matrices , 2001 .