Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is a source of unique individual odors that influence individual recognition, mating preferences, nesting behavior and selective block of pregnancy in animals. Such phenomena have been difficult to study in humans, because the human leukocyte antigen (HLA, human MHC) loci are the most polymorphic loci in the human genome, with the potential to generate millions of unique combinations of genotypes. In addition, high variability in background odors, encoded by the rest of the genome and influenced by cultural practices, contribute to a low signal-to-noise ratio that could mask HLA-based olfactory cues. Here we show that women can detect differences of one HLA allele among male odor donors with different MHC genotypes. Notably, the mechanism for a woman's ability to discriminate and choose odors is based on HLA alleles inherited from her father but not her mother. The parents' HLA alleles that she does not inherit show no relationship with odor choice, despite exposure to these HLA-encoded odors throughout her life. Our data indicate that paternally inherited HLA-associated odors influence odor preference and may serve as social cues.

[1]  B J Mathieson,et al.  Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  K. Berridge,et al.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[3]  B. Schaal,et al.  “Microsmatic Humans” Revisited: The Generation and Perception of Chemical Signals , 1991 .

[4]  E. Banks,et al.  The effect of reciprocal cross fostering on the behaviour of two species of rodents, Mus musculus and Baiomys taylori ater , 1970 .

[5]  C. Wysocki,et al.  Recognition of H-2 types in relation to the blocking of pregnancy in mice. , 1983, Science.

[6]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. , 1988, Science.

[7]  Prim B. Singh,et al.  The Major Histocompatibility Complex and the chemosensory recognition of individuality in rats , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  B. Slotnick,et al.  Chemosensory recognition of mouse major histocompatibility types by another species. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Origin, functions and chemistry of H‐2 regulated odorants , 2004, Genetica.

[10]  P. Slater,et al.  Interest of mice in conspecific male odours is influenced by degree of kinship , 1978, Nature.

[11]  A. Gilbert,et al.  Olfactory discrimination of mouse strains (Mus musculus) and major histocompatibility types by humans (Homo sapiens). , 1986, Journal of comparative psychology.

[12]  Edward K. Wakeland,et al.  Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype , 1991, Nature.

[13]  西田耕之助.  STANDARIZED HUMAN OLFACTORY THRESHOLDS (ヒトの標準化嗅覚閾値) , 1995 .

[14]  W. Potts,et al.  The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[15]  G. Ochoa,et al.  On sex, mate selection and the red queen. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Dietland Müller-Schwarze,et al.  Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 3 , 1983 .

[17]  W. Potts,et al.  Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition , 1992, Nature.

[18]  C. Wedekind,et al.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  C. Ober,et al.  Ancestral and recombinant 16-locus HLA haplotypes in the Hutterites , 1999, Immunogenetics.

[20]  K. Mori,et al.  The olfactory bulb: coding and processing of odor molecule information. , 1999, Science.

[21]  D. Muller-Schwarze.  Chemical Signals in Vertebrates , 1977, Springer US.

[22]  L R Weitkamp,et al.  HLA and mate choice in humans. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[23]  T. Ohta,et al.  Population Biology of Antigen Presentation by MHC Class I Molecules , 1996, Science.

[24]  C. Wedekind,et al.  MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  D. Restrepo,et al.  Olfactory Fingerprints for Major Histocompatibility Complex-Determined Body Odors , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Prim B. Singh,et al.  Soluble MHC antigens and olfactory recognition of genetic individuality: the mechanism , 1998, Genetica.

[27]  Jerram L. Brown,et al.  The major histocompatibility complex and mating preferences of male mice , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  K. Krauel,et al.  Olfactory information processing during the course of the menstrual cycle , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[30]  Frauke Pohlki,et al.  The Mechanism of the , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[31]  M. Devos.  Standardized human olfactory thresholds , 1990 .

[32]  M. Yoshino,et al.  The mouse major histocompatibility complex: some assembly required , 1999, Immunological reviews.

[33]  C. Southwick,et al.  Cross-species fostering: effects on the olfactory preference of Onychomys torridus and Peromyscus leucopus. , 1977, Behavioral biology.

[34]  E. Boyse,et al.  Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types , 1979, The Journal of experimental medicine.