Exposure-Based, ‘Like-for-Like’ Assessment of Road Safety by Travel Mode Using Routine Health Data

Background Official reports on modal risk have not chosen appropriate numerators and denominators to enable like-for-like comparisons. We report age- and sex-specific deaths and injury rates from equivalent incidents in England by travel mode, distance travelled and time spent travelling. Methods Hospital admissions and deaths in England 2007–2009 were obtained for relevant ICD-10 external codes for pedestrians, cyclists, and car/van drivers, by age-group and sex. Distance travelled by age-group, sex and mode in England (National Travel Survey 2007–2009 data) was converted to time spent travelling using mean trip speeds. Fatality rates were compared with age-specific Netherlands data. Results All-age fatalities per million hours’ use (f/mhu) varied over the same factor-of-three range for both sexes (0.15–0.45 f/mhu by mode for men, 0.09–0.31 f/mhu for women). Risks were similar for men aged 21–49 y for all three modes and for female pedestrians and drivers aged 21–69 y. Most at risk were: males 17–20 y (1.3 f/mhu (95% CI 1.2–1.4)) for driving; males 70+ (2.2 f/mhu(1.6–3.0)) for cycling; and females 70+ (0.95 f/mhu (0.86–1.1)) for pedestrians. In general, fatality rates were substantially higher among males than females. Risks per hour for male drivers <30 y were similar or higher than for male cyclists; for males aged 17–20 y, the risk was higher for drivers (33/Bn km (30–36), 1.3 f/mhu (1.2–1.4)) than cyclists (20/Bn km (10–37), 0.24 f/mhu (0.12–0.45)) whether using distance or time. Similar age patterns occurred for cyclists and drivers in the Netherlands. Age-sex patterns for injuries resulting in hospital admission were similar for cyclists and pedestrians but lower for drivers. Conclusions When all relevant ICD-10 codes are used, fatalities by time spent travelling vary within similar ranges for walking, cycling and driving. Risks for drivers were highest in youth and fell with age, while for pedestrians and cyclists, risks increased with age. For the young, especially males, cycling is safer than driving.

[1]  Lindley Owen,et al.  Health on the Move 2 , 2012 .

[2]  N Christie,et al.  Road Traffic Injury Risk in Disadvantaged Communities: Evaluation of the Neighbourhood Road Safety Initiative , 2010 .

[3]  A. Bauman,et al.  Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[4]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Neighborhood social inequalities in road traffic injuries: the influence of traffic volume and road design. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[5]  E. Braver,et al.  Fragility versus excessive crash involvement as determinants of high death rates per vehicle-mile of travel among older drivers. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  A. Haines,et al.  Effect of increasing active travel in urban England and Wales on costs to the National Health Service , 2012, The Lancet.

[7]  Sally Cairns,et al.  How exposure information can enhance our understanding of child traffic “death leagues” , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[8]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Benefits of shift from car to active transport , 2012 .

[9]  Chris Rissel,et al.  Driver Road Rule Knowledge and Attitudes towards Cyclists , 2002 .

[10]  Ma Xiang-lu,et al.  Commuting by Bicycle:An Overview of the Literature , 2011 .

[11]  Malcolm Wardlaw,et al.  Assessing the actual risks faced by cyclists , 2002 .

[12]  Dennis McCarthy,et al.  In defence of the 'low-mileage bias'. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Walking, Cycling and Transport Safety: An Analysis of Child Road Deaths , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[14]  A. Schäfer REGULARITIES IN TRAVEL DEMAND: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[15]  A. Dobson,et al.  Confidence intervals for weighted sums of Poisson parameters. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  D. Rojas-Rueda,et al.  The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[18]  Bruce Corben,et al.  OLDER VULNERABLE ROAD USERS: MEASURES TO REDUCE CRASH AND INJURY RISK , 2004 .

[19]  Mark Woodward,et al.  Unlicensed Drivers and Car Crash Injury , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  R Cuerden,et al.  Technical annex to PPR445 - collisions involving pedal cyclists on Britain's roads: establishing the causes , 2009 .

[21]  H. Nijland,et al.  Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  Fan Zhang,et al.  How to make more cycling good for road safety? , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Maya Siman-Tov,et al.  Bicycle injuries: a matter of mechanism and age , 2010, Injury Prevention.

[24]  Ann M Dellinger,et al.  Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, United States: using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  Richard Reading Walking, cycling and transport safety: an analysis of child road deaths , 2006 .