The effect of monocular depth cues on the detection of moving objects by moving observers

An observer moving through the world must be able to identify and locate moving objects in the scene. In principle, one could accomplish this task by detecting object images moving at a different angle or speed than the images of other items in the optic flow field. While angle of motion provides an unambiguous cue that an object is moving relative to other items in the scene, a difference in speed could be due to a difference in the depth of the objects and thus is an ambiguous cue. We tested whether the addition of information about the distance of objects from the observer, in the form of monocular depth cues, aided detection of moving objects. We found that thresholds for detection of object motion decreased as we increased the number of depth cues available to the observer.

[1]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Detecting moving objects in an optic flow field using direction- and speed-tuned operators , 2014, Vision Research.

[2]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  A model for simultaneous computation of heading and depth in the presence of rotations , 2007, Vision Research.

[3]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Integrating multiple cues to depth order at object boundaries , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Long range interactions between object-motion and self-motion in the perception of movement in depth , 2004, Vision Research.

[5]  Gregory C DeAngelis,et al.  Coding of horizontal disparity and velocity by MT neurons in the alert macaque. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  G. Rhodes,et al.  How is facial expression coded? , 2015, Journal of vision.

[7]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Response of monkey MST neurons to optic flow stimuli with shifted centers of motion , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  James A. Crowell,et al.  The perception of heading during eye movements , 1992, Nature.

[9]  S. Rushton,et al.  Moving observers, relative retinal motion and the detection of object movement , 2005, Current Biology.

[10]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Detection of moving objects using motion- and stereo-tuned operators. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[11]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Estimating heading during eye movements , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision , 2000, Current Biology.

[13]  J Allman,et al.  Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT) , 1985, Perception.

[14]  J H van Hateren,et al.  Simulating human cones from mid-mesopic up to high-photopic luminances. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[15]  D J Hannon,et al.  Eye movements and optical flow. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  G. Orban,et al.  Shape and Spatial Distribution of Receptive Fields and Antagonistic Motion Surrounds in the Middle Temporal Area (V5) of the Macaque , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  S. Rushton,et al.  The pop out of scene-relative object movement against retinal motion due to self-movement , 2007, Cognition.

[19]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[21]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  A. V. D. Berg,et al.  Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow , 1992, Vision Research.

[23]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  J. Allman,et al.  Perceptions of Depth Elicited by Occluded and Shearing Motions of Random Dots , 1988, Perception.

[25]  William B. Thompson,et al.  Detecting moving objects , 1989, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[26]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Local structure of movement parallax of the plane , 1976 .

[27]  Simon K Rushton,et al.  Perception of object trajectory: parsing retinal motion into self and object movement components. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[28]  Massimiliano Di Luca,et al.  Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[29]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[33]  Ellen C. Hildreth,et al.  Recovering heading for visually-guided navigation , 1992, Vision Research.

[34]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Use of speed cues in the detection of moving objects by moving observers , 2012, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[36]  G. Orban,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of inhibitory surrounds in the middle temporal visual area. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving Heading in the Presence of Moving Objects , 1995, Perception.

[38]  Hiroshi Ando,et al.  World-centered perception of 3D object motion during visually guided self-motion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[39]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Zheng Bian,et al.  The ground dominance effect in the perception of 3-D layout , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[42]  S. Rushton,et al.  Optic Flow Processing for the Assessment of Object Movement during Ego Movement , 2009, Current Biology.

[43]  S. Rushton,et al.  Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues , 2009, Vision Research.

[44]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  S. Rushton,et al.  Evidence for flow-parsing in radial flow displays , 2008, Vision Research.