Synthetic MRI, multiplexed sensitivity encoding, and BI-RADS for benign and malignant breast cancer discrimination

Objective To assess the diagnostic value of predictive models based on synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (syMRI), multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) sequences, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods Clinical and MRI data of 158 patients with breast lesions who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), syMRI, and MUSE sequences between September 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of MUSE and quantitative relaxation parameters (longitudinal and transverse relaxation times [T1, T2], and proton density [PD] values) of syMRI were measured, and the parameter variation values and change in their ratios were calculated. The patients were randomly divided into training (n = 111) and validation (n = 47) groups at a ratio of 7:3. A nomogram was built based on univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses in the training group and was verified in the validation group. The discriminatory and predictive capacities of the nomogram were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). The AUC was compared by DeLong test. Results In the training group, univariate analysis showed that age, lesion diameter, menopausal status, ADC, T2pre, PDpre, PDGd, T2Delta, and T2ratio were significantly different between benign and malignant breast lesions (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ADC and T2pre were significant variables (all P < 0.05) in breast cancer diagnosis. The quantitative model (model A: ADC, T2pre), BI-RADS model (model B), and multi-parameter model (model C: ADC, T2pre, BI-RADS) were established by combining the above independent variables, among which model C had the highest diagnostic performance, with AUC of 0.965 and 0.986 in the training and validation groups, respectively. Conclusions The prediction model established based on syMRI, MUSE sequence, and BI-RADS is helpful for clinical differentiation of breast tumors and provides more accurate information for individualized diagnosis.

[1]  S. Maier,et al.  Brain diffusion MRI with multiplexed sensitivity encoding for reduced distortion in a pediatric patient population. , 2022, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  Hui Ma,et al.  Investigated diagnostic value of synthetic relaxometry, three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted imaging in the grading of glioma. , 2021, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  Zhuolin Li,et al.  Multiparameter MRI Model With DCE-MRI, DWI, and Synthetic MRI Improves the Diagnostic Performance of BI-RADS 4 Lesions , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[4]  Y. Guan,et al.  The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2021, Cancer management and research.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  Yue Yao,et al.  Investigation of Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measures in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions as Compared to BI‐RADS , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  R. Kitazawa,et al.  Enhanced Masses on Contrast‐Enhanced Breast: Differentiation Using a Combination of Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI and Quantitative Evaluation with Synthetic MRI , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Erratum: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  Arnaud Guidon,et al.  High-Spatial-Resolution Multishot Multiplexed Sensitivity-encoding Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Improved Quality of Breast Images and Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Feasibility Study. , 2020, Radiology. Imaging cancer.

[10]  Min Chen,et al.  Diagnosis and Grading of Prostate Cancer by Relaxation Maps From Synthetic MRI , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  R. Mann,et al.  Breast MRI: State of the Art. , 2019, Radiology.

[12]  Zheng Hao,et al.  A nomogram for predicting individual prognoses of patients with low-grade glioma. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[13]  Weijun Peng,et al.  Role of quantitative analysis of T2 relaxation time in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions , 2018, The Journal of international medical research.

[14]  B. Seo,et al.  Additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate multifocal and multicentric breast cancer detected using pre-operative breast MRI , 2017, European Radiology.

[15]  T. Naidich,et al.  Synthetic MRI for Clinical Neuroimaging: Results of the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) Prospective, Multicenter, Multireader Trial , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  Noam Nissan,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment , 2016, Neuroradiology.

[18]  T. Jiang,et al.  MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography. , 2016, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[19]  T. Helbich,et al.  Multiparametric MR Imaging with High-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Imaging at 7 T Improves the Assessment of Breast Tumors: A Feasibility Study. , 2015, Radiology.

[20]  Nan-kuei Chen,et al.  Interleaved EPI Based fMRI Improved by Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE) and Simultaneous Multi-Band Imaging , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Hauke Bartsch,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer: physical foundations and applications of restriction spectrum imaging. , 2014, Cancer research.

[22]  Allen W. Song,et al.  A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE) , 2013, NeuroImage.

[23]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  High resolution diffusion‐weighted imaging using readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two‐dimensional navigator‐based reacquisition , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Wilma van der Riet,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) for the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions , 2009, European Radiology.

[25]  Evelyn Wenkel,et al.  Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[26]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[27]  T. Roberts,et al.  MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[28]  Shigeru Nawano,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[29]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  M D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. , 2001, Radiology.

[31]  C C Glüer,et al.  Evaluation of water content by spatially resolved transverse relaxation times of human articular cartilage. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[32]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  D G Gadian,et al.  The effect of residual Nyquist ghost in quantitative echo‐planar diffusion imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  T. Merchant,et al.  Application of a Mixed Imaging Sequence for MR Imaging Characterization of Human Breast Disease , 1993, Acta radiologica.

[35]  C. Biagini [Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the tissue characterization of tumors]. , 1986, La Radiologia medica.

[36]  Markus Voelter,et al.  State of the Art , 1997, Pediatric Research.

[37]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[38]  J. Affeldt,et al.  The feasibility study , 2019, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook.