An Experimental Investigation of Landscape Resistance of Forest versus Old‐Field Habitats to Emigrating Juvenile Amphibians

Abstract: We used an experimental approach to investigate the effects of landscape composition on the initial dispersal success of juvenile amphibians. Larval amphibians—spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculatum), small-mouthed salamander (A. texanum), and American toad (  Bufo americanus )—were added to artificial pools in four dispersal arrays on forest edges. Each array consisted of a pool surrounded by a circular drift fence with pitfall traps and two 2.5 × 50 m enclosures (runs) extending into forest and old-field habitat. Juveniles captured at the circular fences were individually marked and released into either field or forest runs. We determined initial distance, initial rate, total distance, and net distance moved by juveniles in the field versus forest from recaptures in the runs. We also conducted 24-hour dehydration trials to compare the rates of evaporative water loss by spotted and small-mouthed salamanders in field and forest. Initial orientation of spotted salamanders and toads was significantly biased toward forest. Orientation of small-mouthed salamanders did not differ significantly from random expectations. The avoidance of open-canopy habitat by juvenile American toads in particular indicates that predictions of dispersal behavior based on adult habitat use may be misleading. Spotted salamanders moved almost four times farther and toads more than three times farther into the forest than into the field, and recapture rates of both species were much lower in the field. We attribute the lower recapture rates and shorter distances moved in the field to higher mortality due to desiccation or an abundance of predators. Juvenile spotted and small-mouthed salamanders experienced greater evaporative water loss in the field. Our data on movement behavior and dehydration rates suggest that old-field habitats offer greater landscape resistance to dispersing juveniles of some species. Thus, forest fragmentation is likely to reduce dispersal rates between local populations of these three species, with potentially negative consequences for population persistence in altered landscapes.

[1]  B. Verboom,et al.  Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities , 1990 .

[2]  B. Noon,et al.  Compensatory behavior of Ensatina eschscholtzii in biological corridors: a field experiment , 1998 .

[3]  R. D. Semlitsch.  Terrestrial activity and summer home range of the mole salamander (Ambystoma talpoideum) , 1981 .

[4]  U. Sinsch.  Migration and orientation in anuran amphibians , 1990 .

[5]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[6]  R. S. Oldham.  SPRING MOVEMENTS IN THE AMERICAN TOAD, BUFO AMERICANUS , 1966 .

[7]  D. Madison,et al.  OVERWINTERING HABITATS OF RADIO-IMPLANTED GREEN FROGS, RANA CLAMITANS , 1999 .

[8]  S. Harrison,et al.  Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation , 1991 .

[9]  C. Vos,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis , 1998 .

[10]  F. Breden.  The effect of post-metamorphic dispersal on the population genetic structure of Fowler''s toad , 1987 .

[11]  Richard E. Wilson,et al.  Natural Daily Temperature Stress, Dehydration, and Acclimation in Juvenile Ambystoma Maculatum (Shaw) (Amphibia: Caudata) , 1970, Physiological Zoology.

[12]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Amphibian Movements in Response to Forest Edges, Roads, and Streambeds in Southern New England , 1998 .

[13]  D. E. Gill.  The Metapopulation Ecology of the Red‐Spotted Newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque) , 1978 .

[14]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Anthropogenic Correlates of Species Richness in Southeastern Ontario Wetlands , 1997 .

[15]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Are Small, Isolated Wetlands Expendable? , 1998 .

[16]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  D. E. Scott,et al.  CHAPTER 9 – Structure and Dynamics of an Amphibian Community: Evidence from a 16-Year Study of a Natural Pond , 1996 .

[18]  T. L. Taigen,et al.  Activity metabolism of the toad (Bufo americanus): Ecological consequences of ontogenetic change , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[19]  I. Jonsen,et al.  Calopteryx Damselfly Dispersions Arising from Multiscale Responses to Landscape Structure , 2000 .

[20]  R. Swihart,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and the distribution of amphibians: patch and landscape correlates in farmland , 1999 .

[21]  K. Berven,et al.  DISPERSAL IN THE WOOD FROG (RANA SYLVATICA): IMPLICATIONS FOR GENETIC POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  The relationship between forest management and amphibian ecology: a review of the North American literature , 1995 .

[23]  T. R. Johnson.  The Amphibians and Reptiles of Missouri , 1987 .

[24]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[25]  T. M. Spight.  The Water Economy of Salamanders: Evaporative Water Loss , 1968, Physiological Zoology.

[26]  L. Trueb,et al.  Biology of Amphibians , 1986 .

[27]  R. M’Closkey,et al.  Regional Dynamics and the Status of Amphibians , 1996 .

[28]  R. D. Semlitsch.  Biological Delineation of Terrestrial Buffer Zones for Pond‐Breeding Salamanders , 1998 .

[29]  J. Spotila.  Role of Temperature and Water in the Ecology of Lungless Salamanders , 1972 .

[30]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[31]  David K. Skelly,et al.  LONG-TERM DISTRIBUTIONAL DYNAMICS OF A MICHIGAN AMPHIBIAN ASSEMBLAGE , 1999 .

[32]  D. Wake,et al.  Amphibian Declines: Judging Stability, Persistence, and Susceptibility of Populations to Local and Global Extinctions , 1994 .

[33]  N. Haddad.  Corridor Use Predicted from Behaviors at Habitat Boundaries , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[34]  P. Sjögren.  Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae) , 1991 .

[35]  M. Cody,et al.  Long-term studies of vertebrate communities , 1997 .

[36]  P. G. Demaynadier,et al.  Forest canopy closure and juvenile emigration by pool-breeding amphibians in Maine , 1999 .

[37]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[38]  J. Petranka,et al.  Salamanders of the United States and Canada , 1998 .

[39]  J. Halley,et al.  Predicting the Persistence of Amphibian Populations with the Help of a Spatial Model , 1996 .

[40]  T. Ricketts.  The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[41]  K. Gosner,et al.  A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification , 1960 .

[42]  Ross A. Alford,et al.  Global Amphibian Declines: A Problem in Applied Ecology , 1999 .