Nonrigid registration of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance images of the carotid arteries.

Atherosclerosis at the carotid bifurcation can result in cerebral emboli, which in turn can block the blood supply to the brain causing ischemic strokes. Noninvasive imaging tools that better characterize arterial wall, and atherosclerotic plaque structure and composition may help to determine the factors which lead to the development of unstable lesions, and identify patients at risk of plaque disruption and stroke. Carotid magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for the characterization of carotid vessel wall and plaque composition, the characterization of normal and pathological arterial wall, the quantification of plaque size, and the detection of plaque integrity. On the other hand, various ultrasound (US) measurements have also been used to quantify atherosclerosis, carotid stenosis, intima-media thickness, total plaque volume, total plaque area, and vessel wall volume. Combining the complementary information provided by 3D MR and US carotid images may lead to a better understanding of the underlying compositional and textural factors that define plaque and wall vulnerability, which may lead to better and more effective stroke prevention strategies and patient management. Combining these images requires nonrigid registration to correct the nonlinear misalignments caused by relative twisting and bending in the neck due to different head positions during the two image acquisition sessions. The high degree of freedom and large number of parameters associated with existing nonrigid image registration methods causes several problems including unnatural plaque morphology alteration, high computational complexity, and low reliability. Thus, a "twisting and bending" model was used with only six parameters to model the normal movement of the neck for nonrigid registration. The registration technique was evaluated using 3D US and MR carotid images at two field strengths, 1.5 and 3.0 T, of the same subject acquired on the same day. The mean registration error between the segmented carotid artery wall boundaries in the target US image and the registered MR images was calculated using a distance-based error metric after applying a "twisting and bending" model based nonrigid registration algorithm. An average registration error of 1.4 +/- 0.3 mm was obtained for 1.5 T MR and 1.5 +/- 0.4 mm for 3.0 T MR, when registered with 3D US images using the nonrigid registration technique presented in this paper. Visual inspection of segmented vessel surfaces also showed a substantial improvement of alignment with this nonrigid registration technique compared to rigid registration.

[1]  Balraj Naren,et al.  Medical Image Registration , 2022 .

[2]  F. Fabris,et al.  Carotid Plaque, Aging, and Risk Factors A Study of 457 Subjects , 1994, Stroke.

[3]  W Paulus,et al.  Embolus detection in different degrees of carotid disease. , 1995, Neurological research.

[4]  A D Hughes,et al.  Carotid geometry reconstruction: a comparison between MRI and ultrasound. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  3D Ultrasound Measurement of Change in Carotid Plaque Volume: A Tool for Rapid Evaluation of New Therapies , 2005, Stroke.

[6]  J. David Spence,et al.  Carotid Plaque Area: A Tool for Targeting and Evaluating Vascular Preventive Therapy , 2002, Stroke.

[7]  Mark Fisher,et al.  Carotid Plaque Pathology: Thrombosis, Ulceration, and Stroke Pathogenesis , 2005, Stroke.

[8]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  David M Herrington,et al.  C-Reactive Protein, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, and Incidence of Ischemic Stroke in the Elderly: The Cardiovascular Health Study , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  A. Fenster,et al.  Po‐Thur Eve General‐24: Non‐Invasive Imaging Phenotypes of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Subjects: MRI, B‐mode and 3D Ultrasound Measurements , 2006 .

[11]  Jeffrey Tsao,et al.  Interpolation artifacts in multimodality image registration based on maximization of mutual information , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  J David Spence,et al.  Technology Insight: ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque—patient management, genetic research, and therapy evaluation , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Neurology.

[14]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Plaque ulceration and lumen thrombus are the main sources of cerebral microemboli in high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. , 1995, Stroke.

[17]  Christopher B. Kendall,et al.  Clinical use of carotid intima-media thickness: review of the literature. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[18]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Automated measurement of mean wall thickness in the common carotid artery by MRI: A comparison to intima‐media thickness by B‐mode ultrasound , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  V. Fuster,et al.  Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. , 1996, Circulation.

[20]  Volker Rasche,et al.  Non-rigid registration for fusion of carotid vascular ultrasound and MRI volumetric datasets , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  John David Spence,et al.  A “Twisting and Bending” Model-Based Nonrigid Image Registration Technique for 3-D Ultrasound Carotid Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  E. Falk Why do plaques rupture? , 1992, Circulation.

[25]  J. Edelstein,et al.  Ultrasonic-pathological comparison of the human arterial wall. Verification of intima-media thickness. , 1993, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[26]  B. Lal,et al.  Noninvasive Identification of the Unstable Carotid Plaque , 2006, Annals of vascular surgery.

[27]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Mapping spatial and temporal changes in carotid atherosclerosis from three-dimensional ultrasound images. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  M. Davies Pathology of arterial thrombosis. , 1994, British medical bulletin.

[29]  Chun Yuan,et al.  In Vivo Quantitative Measurement of Intact Fibrous Cap and Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core Size in Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque: Comparison of High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histology , 2005, Circulation.

[30]  Fei Liu,et al.  MRI of atherosclerosis in clinical trials , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[31]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[32]  C. Tegeler,et al.  Influence of ECG-triggered data acquisition on reliability for carotid plaque volume measurements with a magnetic sensor three-dimensional ultrasound system. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[33]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. , 1998, Journal of insurance medicine.

[34]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[35]  David R. Haynor,et al.  Nonrigid multimodality image registration , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[36]  A Fenster,et al.  Evaluation of voxel-based registration of 3-D power Doppler ultrasound and 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images of carotid arteries. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[37]  D. Ku,et al.  Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in the Human Carotid Bifurcation: Positive Correlation between Plaque Location and Low and Oscillating Shear Stress , 1985, Arteriosclerosis.

[38]  C. Yuan,et al.  Visualization of Fibrous Cap Thickness and Rupture in Human Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque In Vivo With High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Circulation.

[39]  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. , 1995, JAMA.

[40]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Measurement of Carotid Plaque Volume by 3-Dimensional Ultrasound , 2004, Stroke.

[41]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Manual planimetric measurement of carotid plaque volume using three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[42]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  A H Davies,et al.  The symptomatic carotid plaque. , 2000, Stroke.

[44]  A. Fenster,et al.  Optimum scan spacing for three-dimensional ultrasound by speckle statistics. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[45]  Jonathan S. Lewin,et al.  Three-dimensional automatic volume registration of carotid MR images , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[46]  M G Hunink,et al.  Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  A. Fenster,et al.  Validation of 3D ultrasound vessel wall volume: an imaging phenotype of carotid atherosclerosis. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[48]  A. Fenster,et al.  3D ultrasound analysis of carotid plaque volume and surface morphology. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[49]  R R Edelman,et al.  AHA scientific statement. Magnetic resonance angiography : update on applications for extracranial arteries. , 1999, Circulation.

[50]  A. Petrov,et al.  A Formula of Gauss in The Method Of Least Squares , 1992 .

[51]  M. McConnell,et al.  Multicontrast black‐blood MRI of carotid arteries: Comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[52]  Bradford J. Wood,et al.  Segmentation of liver tumors using the Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit , 2004, CARS.

[53]  C Yuan,et al.  Measurement of atherosclerotic carotid plaque size in vivo using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Circulation.

[54]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. , 2005, Radiology.

[55]  V. Fuster,et al.  Clinical Imaging of the High-Risk or Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2001, Circulation research.

[56]  P Allan,et al.  What pathological components indicate carotid atheroma activity and can these be identified reliably using ultrasound? , 2000, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[57]  R S Reneman,et al.  Age-related changes in carotid artery wall properties in men. , 1986, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[58]  W. Kerwin,et al.  The vulnerable, or high-risk, atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR imaging for characterization and assessment. , 2007, Radiology.

[59]  D A Steinman,et al.  On the nature and reduction of plaque‐mimicking flow artifacts in black blood MRI of the carotid bifurcation , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.