Number of days required for reliably estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour from accelerometer data in older adults

ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to examine the minimum number of monitoring days for reliably estimating physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) from accelerometer data in older adults. Forty-two older adults from a local senior centre participated in this study. Participants wore an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT on the right hip for 7 consecutive days. Accelerometer data were downloaded to a computer and converted to activity count data in 60s epochs. Time spent in SB and different PA intensity categories were estimated with commonly used activity count cut-points. Participants with at least 7 valid days of monitoring (≥10 h.day−1) were included in the analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for determining single-day monitoring reliability. The Spearman-Brown prophecy formula was used to estimate the minimum number of monitoring days required for achieving an ICC of 0.80. Single-day ICC values for time spent in SB and PA intensity categories ranged from 0.45 to 0.61. Minimum number of monitoring days required for achieving an ICC of 0.80 ranged from 2.5 to 4.9 days. In this study, a minimum of 5 consecutive days of monitoring was required for reliably estimating SB and PA from accelerometer data in older adults.

[1]  K. Brazendale,et al.  Measuring Physical Activity in Older Adults Using MotionWatch 8 Actigraphy: How Many Days are Needed? , 2017, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[2]  R. Troiano,et al.  Number of accelerometer monitoring days needed for stable group-level estimates of activity , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Eivind Aadland,et al.  Reliability of Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Adults , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  Wendy J Brown,et al.  ActiGraph GT3X+ cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments. , 2014, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[6]  Richard P Troiano,et al.  Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[7]  L. Andersen,et al.  Influence of number of days and valid hours using accelerometry on the estimates of physical activity level in preschool children from Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil , 2014 .

[8]  Scott Duncan,et al.  Accelerometer data reduction in adolescents: effects on sample retention and bias , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[9]  R. Eisinga,et al.  The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? , 2013, International Journal of Public Health.

[10]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[11]  Scott J Strath,et al.  How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults? , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[12]  Kenneth R Fox,et al.  Objectively measured physical activity in a diverse sample of older urban UK adults. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  P. Freedson,et al.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  D. Rowe,et al.  Daily walking in older adults: day-to-day variability and criterion-referenced validity of total daily step counts. , 2007, Journal of physical activity & health.

[15]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  O. Almeida [Mini mental state examination and the diagnosis of dementia in Brazil]. , 1998, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[17]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[19]  Dinesh John,et al.  Measurement of Physical Activity Using Accelerometers , 2016 .

[20]  J. V. van Dieën,et al.  Assessing physical activity in older adults: required days of trunk accelerometer measurements for reliable estimation. , 2015, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[21]  C. Matthews,et al.  Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  O. Almeida Mini exame dos estado mental e o diagnstico de demncia no Brasil , 1998 .