Automatic detection of vertebral number abnormalities in body CT images

PurposeThe anatomical anomaly of the number of vertebral bones is one of the major anomalies in the human body, which can cause confusion of the spinal level in, for example, surgery. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic detection system for this type of anomaly.MethodsWe utilized our previously reported anatomical landmark detection system for this anomaly detection problem. This system uses a landmark point distribution model (L-PDM) to find multiple landmark positions. The L-PDM is a statistical probabilistic model of all landmark positions in the human body, including five landmarks for each vertebra. Given a new volume, the proposed algorithm applies five hypotheses (normal, 11 or 13 thoracic vertebrae, 4 or 6 lumbar vertebrae) to the given spine and attempts to detect all the landmarks. Then, the most plausible hypothesis with the largest posterior likelihood is selected as the anatomy detection result.ResultsThe proposed method was evaluated using 300 neck-to-pelvis CT datasets. For normal subjects, the vertebrae of 211/217 (97.2%) of the subjects were successfully determined as normal. For subjects with 23 or 25 vertebrae without a transitional vertebra (TV), the vertebrae of 9/10 (90%) of the subjects were successfully determined. For subjects with TV, the vertebrae of 71/73 (97.3%) of subjects were judged as partially successfully determined.ConclusionOur algorithm successfully determined the number of vertebrae, and the feasibility of our proposed system was validated.

[1]  A. Castellvi,et al.  Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae and Their Relationship With Lumbar Extradural Defects , 1984, Spine.

[2]  Stefan Freitag,et al.  VolHOG: a volumetric object recognition approach based on bivariate histograms of oriented gradients for vertebra detection in cervical spine MRI. , 2014, Medical physics.

[3]  Michael Kaus,et al.  Semiautomatic vertebrae visualization, detection, and identification for online palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases of the spine. , 2007, Medical physics.

[4]  Chengwen Chu,et al.  Fully Automatic Localization and Segmentation of 3D Vertebral Bodies from CT/MR Images via a Learning-Based Method , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  H. Labelle,et al.  Spine Segmentation in Medical Images Using Manifold Embeddings and Higher-Order MRFs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Vertebrae Localization in Pathological Spine CT via Dense Classification from Sparse Annotations , 2013, MICCAI.

[7]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Automatic Localization and Identification of Vertebrae in Arbitrary Field-of-View CT Scans , 2012, MICCAI.

[8]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Automated spinal column extraction and partitioning , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[9]  Shang-Hong Lai,et al.  Learning-Based Vertebra Detection and Iterative Normalized-Cut Segmentation for Spinal MRI , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Lytic metastases in thoracolumbar spine: computer-aided detection at CT--preliminary study. , 2007, Radiology.

[11]  Richard J. Prokop,et al.  A survey of moment-based techniques for unoccluded object representation and recognition , 1992, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[12]  Takafumi Kanamori,et al.  Information Geometry of U-Boost and Bregman Divergence , 2004, Neural Computation.

[13]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[14]  A. Nakajima,et al.  The prevalence of morphological changes in the thoracolumbar spine on whole-spine computed tomographic images , 2013, Insights into Imaging.

[15]  Yoshitaka Masutani,et al.  Automatic detection of over 100 anatomical landmarks in medical CT images: A framework with independent detectors and combinatorial optimization , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Spine detection in CT and MR using iterated marginal space learning , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Computer-Assisted Screw Size and Insertion Trajectory Planning for Pedicle Screw Placement Surgery , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  R E Wigh,et al.  The Thoracolumbar and Lumbosacral Transitional Junctions , 1980, Spine.

[19]  Yoshitaka Masutani,et al.  A unified framework for concurrent detection of anatomical landmarks for medical image understanding , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[20]  John Hsiang,et al.  Wrong-level surgery: A unique problem in spine surgery , 2011, Surgical neurology international.

[21]  John Eng,et al.  Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[22]  Matthijs C. Dorst.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[23]  Hidekata Hontani,et al.  A Study on Graphical Model Structure for Representing Statistical Shape Model of Point Distribution Model , 2012, MICCAI.

[24]  Vikas V Patel,et al.  Unusual spine anatomy contributing to wrong level spine surgery: a case report and recommendations for decreasing the risk of preventable 'never events' , 2011, Patient safety in surgery.

[25]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[26]  Jun Ma,et al.  Hierarchical segmentation and identification of thoracic vertebra using learning-based edge detection and coarse-to-fine deformable model , 2010, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[27]  Florian Schulze,et al.  Automated landmarking and labeling of fully and partially scanned spinal columns in CT images , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  Yoshitaka Masutani,et al.  A Multiple Anatomical Landmark Detection System for Body CT Images , 2013, 2013 First International Symposium on Computing and Networking.

[29]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Framework for Automated Spine and Vertebrae Interpolation-Based Detection and Model-Based Segmentation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Yoshitaka Masutani,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Landmark Distances and Structure for Anomaly-proof Landmark Detection , 2011 .

[31]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Probabilistic 3D Polyp Detection in CT Images: The Role of Sample Alignment , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[32]  Chengwen Chu,et al.  Localization and Segmentation of 3D Intervertebral Discs in MR Images by Data Driven Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  F. Hahn,et al.  Verification of lumbosacral segments on MR images: identification of transitional vertebrae. , 1992, Radiology.