Evaluating and integrating spatial capture–recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability

Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have become the preferred tool for estimating densities of carnivores. Within this family of models are variants requiring identification of all individuals in each encounter (SCR), a subset of individuals only (generalized spatial mark-resight, gSMR), or no individual identification (spatial count or spatial presence-absence). Although each technique has been shown through simulation to yield unbiased results, the consistency and relative precision of estimates across methods in real-world settings are seldom considered. We tested a suite of models ranging from those only requiring detections of unmarked individuals to others that integrate remote camera, physical capture, genetic, and global positioning system (GPS) data into a ‘hybrid’ model, to estimate population densities of black bears, bobcats, cougars, and coyotes. For each species we genotyped fecal DNA collected with detection dogs during a 20-day period. A subset of individuals from each species was affixed with GPS collars bearing unique markings and resighted by remote cameras over 140 days contemporaneous with scat collection. Camera-based gSMR models produced density estimates that differed by less than 10% from genetic SCR for bears, cougars, and coyotes once important sources of variation (sex or behavioral status) were controlled for. For bobcats, SCR estimates were 33% higher than gSMR. The cause of the discrepancies in estimates was likely attributable to challenges designing a study compatible for species with disparate home range sizes and the difficulty of collecting sufficient data in a timeframe in which demographic closure could be assumed. Unmarked models estimated densities that varied greatly from SCR, but estimates became more consistent in models wherein more individuals were identifiable. Hybrid models containing all data sources exhibited the most precise estimates for all species. For studies in which only sparse data can be obtained and the strictest model assumptions are unlikely to be met, we suggest researchers use caution making inference from models lacking individual identity. For best results, we further recommend the use of methods requiring at least a subset of the population is marked and that multiple datasets are incorporated when possible.

[1]  Duncan Temple Lang,et al.  Programming With Models: Writing Statistical Algorithms for General Model Structures With NIMBLE , 2015, 1505.05093.

[2]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Starkey Project : history facilities, and data collection methods for ungulate research , 1997 .

[3]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data. , 2008, Ecology.

[4]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS , 2003 .

[5]  Richard B. Chandler,et al.  Generalized spatial mark–resight models with an application to grizzly bears , 2018 .

[6]  Donald S. Balser Tranquilizer Tabs for Capturing Wild Carnivores , 1965 .

[7]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatial Capture-Recapture , 2013 .

[8]  Rahel Sollmann,et al.  Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil , 2011 .

[9]  J. Fisher,et al.  The importance of considering multiple interacting species for conservation of species at risk , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Scat detection dogs in wildlife research and management: application to grizzly and black bears in the Yellowhead ecosystem, Alberta, Canada , 2004 .

[11]  Sophie M. Czetwertynski,et al.  Tube traps and rubber padded snares for capturing American black bears , 2006 .

[12]  Samuel T. Turvey,et al.  Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition , 2008 .

[13]  Jennifer M. Allen,et al.  Comparison of mechanical sorting and DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis with degraded wolf scats , 2019, bioRxiv.

[14]  S. Wasser,et al.  Validation and application of noninvasive glucocorticoid and thyroid hormone measures in free-ranging Hawaiian monk seals. , 2014, General and comparative endocrinology.

[15]  Hugh S. Robinson,et al.  Sampling design and analytical advances allow for simultaneous density estimation of seven sympatric carnivore species from camera trap data , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[16]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies. , 2009, Ecology.

[17]  Edward O. Garton,et al.  Experimental Design for Radiotelemetry Studies , 2001 .

[18]  O. Gimenez,et al.  Use of Integrated Modeling to Enhance Estimates of Population Dynamics Obtained from Limited Data , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  J. Andrew Royle N‐Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts , 2004, Biometrics.

[20]  Rahel Sollmann,et al.  camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management , 2016 .

[21]  Ben C. Augustine,et al.  Integrating multiple genetic detection methods to estimate population density of social and territorial carnivores , 2018, Ecosphere.

[22]  T. A. Rittenhouse,et al.  Evaluating spatially explicit density estimates of unmarked wildlife detected by remote cameras , 2018, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[23]  B. Goossens,et al.  Patterns of genetic diversity and migration in increasingly fragmented and declining orang‐utan (Pongo pygmaeus) populations from Sabah, Malaysia , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[24]  Ming-Hui Chen,et al.  Monte Carlo Estimation of Bayesian Credible and HPD Intervals , 1999 .

[25]  David L. Erickson,et al.  DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Joel S. Ruprecht,et al.  More affordable and effective noninvasive SNP genotyping using high-throughput amplicon sequencing , 2019, bioRxiv.

[27]  Brett T McClintock,et al.  A spatial mark--resight model augmented with telemetry data. , 2013, Ecology.

[28]  P. Caley,et al.  Estimating population density from presence–absence data using a spatially explicit model , 2015 .

[29]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatial capture–recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture–recapture , 2019, Ecosphere.

[30]  Paul M. Lukacs,et al.  Three novel methods to estimate abundance of unmarked animals using remote cameras , 2018, Ecosphere.

[31]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatial capture–recapture with partial identity: An application to camera traps , 2018 .

[32]  M. Efford Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[33]  Richard J. Delahay,et al.  A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation , 2001 .

[34]  P Besbeas,et al.  Integrating Mark–Recapture–Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters , 2002, Biometrics.

[35]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[36]  M. Kelly,et al.  Making the most of sparse data to estimate density of a rare and threatened species: a case study with the fosa, a little‐studied Malagasy carnivore , 2018 .

[37]  John P. Volpe,et al.  Estimating density for species conservation: Comparing camera trap spatial count models to genetic spatial capture-recapture models , 2018, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[38]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Fully Spatial Capture-Recapture Models , 2014 .

[39]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations , 2011, 1112.3250.

[40]  Rahel Sollmann,et al.  Combining camera-trapping and noninvasive genetic data in a spatial capture–recapture framework improves density estimates for the jaguar , 2013 .

[41]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Inference and monitoring convergence , 1995 .

[42]  Dana J. Morin,et al.  Efficient single-survey estimation of carnivore density using fecal DNA and spatial capture-recapture: a bobcat case study , 2018, Population Ecology.

[43]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Use of Spatial Capture‐Recapture Modeling and DNA Data to Estimate Densities of Elusive Animals , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[44]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[45]  Brett T McClintock,et al.  A less field-intensive robust design for estimating demographic parameters with mark-resight data. , 2009, Ecology.

[46]  Overview of the Starkey Project: mule deer and elk research for management benefits. , 2004 .

[47]  Dana J. Morin,et al.  Monitoring coyote population dynamics with fecal DNA and spatial capture–recapture , 2016 .

[48]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations , 1995 .

[49]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Density estimation in tiger populations: combining information for strong inference. , 2012, Ecology.

[50]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Capture-recapture models. , 1992 .

[51]  A. Flecker,et al.  Riparian plant litter quality increases with latitude , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[52]  M. Scharf,et al.  Rapid evolutionary responses to insecticide resistance management interventions by the German cockroach (Blattella germanica L.) , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[53]  John D. J. Clare,et al.  Pairing field methods to improve inference in wildlife surveys while accommodating detection covariance. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[54]  Alain Viari,et al.  ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[55]  Dana J. Morin,et al.  Potential for camera-traps and spatial mark-resight models to improve monitoring of the critically endangered West African lion (Panthera leo) , 2015, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[56]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[57]  S. Lele,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment The influences of wolf predation , habitat loss , and human activity on caribou and moose in the Alberta oil sands , 2011 .

[58]  R. Sikes,et al.  2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education , 2016, Journal of Mammalogy.