Canopy warming caused photosynthetic acclimation and reduced seed yield in maize grown at ambient and elevated [CO2]

Rising atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2 ]) and attendant increases in growing season temperature are expected to be the most important global change factors impacting production agriculture. Although maize is the most highly produced crop worldwide, few studies have evaluated the interactive effects of elevated [CO2 ] and temperature on its photosynthetic physiology, agronomic traits or biomass, and seed yield under open field conditions. This study investigates the effects of rising [CO2 ] and warmer temperature, independently and in combination, on maize grown in the field throughout a full growing season. Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) technology was used to target atmospheric [CO2 ] to 200 μmol mol(-1) above ambient [CO2 ] and infrared heaters to target a plant canopy increase of 3.5 °C, with actual season mean heating of ~2.7 °C, mimicking conditions predicted by the second half of this century. Photosynthetic gas-exchange parameters, leaf nitrogen and carbon content, leaf water potential components, and developmental measurements were collected throughout the season, and biomass and yield were measured at the end of the growing season. As predicted for a C4 plant, elevated [CO2 ] did not stimulate photosynthesis, biomass, or yield. Canopy warming caused a large shift in aboveground allocation by stimulating season-long vegetative biomass and decreasing reproductive biomass accumulation at both CO2 concentrations, resulting in decreased harvest index. Warming caused a reduction in photosynthesis due to down-regulation of photosynthetic biochemical parameters and the decrease in the electron transport rate. The reduction in seed yield with warming was driven by reduced photosynthetic capacity and by a shift in aboveground carbon allocation away from reproduction. This field study portends that future warming will reduce yield in maize, and this will not be mitigated by higher atmospheric [CO2 ] unless appropriate adaptation traits can be introduced into future cultivars.

[1]  B. Kimball,et al.  Global Warming Can Negate the Expected CO2 Stimulation in Photosynthesis and Productivity for Soybean Grown in the Midwestern United States1[W][OA] , 2013, Plant Physiology.

[2]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  The challenge to keep global warming below 2 °C , 2013 .

[3]  B. Acock,et al.  Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey , 1986 .

[4]  M. Westgate,et al.  Relationship between desiccation and viability of maize pollen , 2005 .

[5]  M. D. Hatch,et al.  C4 photosynthesis: discovery and resolution , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[6]  Lewis H. Ziska,et al.  Influence of increasing carbon dioxide concentration on the photosynthetic and growth stimulation of selected C4crops and weeds , 1997, Photosynthesis Research.

[7]  G. Edwards,et al.  Bundle Sheath Diffusive Resistance to CO2 and Effectiveness of C4 Photosynthesis and Refixation of Photorespired CO2 in a C4 Cycle Mutant and Wild-Type Amaranthus edulis 1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[8]  D. Lobell,et al.  Greater Sensitivity to Drought Accompanies Maize Yield Increase in the U.S. Midwest , 2014, Science.

[9]  G. Hoogenboom,et al.  Effect of high temperature on photosynthesis and transpiration of sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. rugosa) , 2008, Photosynthetica.

[10]  R. Furbank,et al.  The C4 pathway: an efficient CO2 pump , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[11]  J. R. Evans.  Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants , 2004, Oecologia.

[12]  B. Kimball,et al.  Theory and performance of an infrared heater for ecosystem warming , 2005 .

[13]  J. S. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  AN INTERPRETATION OF THE HYDRODYNAMICS OF POLLEN , 1979 .

[14]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves , 1981, Planta.

[15]  J. Conroy,et al.  Nitrogen deficiency precludes a growth response to CO2 enrichment in C3 and C4 Panicum grasses , 1998 .

[16]  Susanne von Caemmerer,et al.  Faster Rubisco Is the Key to Superior Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in NADP-Malic Enzyme Relative to NAD-Malic Enzyme C4 Grasses1 , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[17]  J. Starr,et al.  Real-time soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes : Laboratory calibration , 1997 .

[18]  J. Briantais,et al.  The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1989 .

[19]  G. Edwards,et al.  Can CO2 assimilation in maize leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis? , 1993, Photosynthesis Research.

[20]  Michael E. Salvucci,et al.  Sensitivity of Photosynthesis in a C4 Plant, Maize, to Heat Stress , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[21]  R. B. Hunter,et al.  EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE DURING GRAIN FILLING ON WHOLE PLANT AND GRAIN YIELD IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.) , 1983 .

[22]  M. D. Hatch,et al.  C4 Photosynthesis: An Unlikely Process Full of Surprises , 1992 .

[23]  J. Boyer,et al.  Starch and the control of kernel number in maize at low water potentials. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[24]  G. Edwards,et al.  Estimation of diffusive resistance of bundle sheath cells to CO2 from modeling of C4 photosynthesis , 1996, Photosynthesis Research.

[25]  T. Setter,et al.  Loss of Kernel Set Due to Water Deficit and Shade in Maize , 2001 .

[26]  D. Patterson,et al.  Potential Effects of Global Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment on the Growth and Competitiveness of C3 and C4 Weed and Crop Plants , 1980, Weed Science.

[27]  R. Leegood,et al.  Effects of temperature on the regulation of photosynthetic carbon assimilation in leaves of maize and barley , 1990, Planta.

[28]  C. Kucharik,et al.  Impacts of recent climate change on Wisconsin corn and soybean yield trends , 2008 .

[29]  A. Thomson,et al.  Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop Production , 2011 .

[30]  P. Pinter,et al.  Elevated CO2 increases sorghum biomass under drought conditions , 2001 .

[31]  A. Rogers,et al.  Testing the “source–sink” hypothesis of down-regulation of photosynthesis in elevated [CO2] in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycine max , 2004 .

[32]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Broad range of 2050 warming from an observationally constrained large climate model ensemble , 2012 .

[33]  R. Sage.  Variation in the kcat of Rubisco in C3 and C4 plants and some implications for photosynthetic performance at high and low temperature , 2002 .

[34]  P. Pinter,et al.  Elevated atmospheric CO2 improved Sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought , 2001 .

[35]  A. Rogers,et al.  Photosynthesis, Productivity, and Yield of Maize Are Not Affected by Open-Air Elevation of CO2 Concentration in the Absence of Drought1[OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[36]  R. Furbank,et al.  Mechanism of c(4) photosynthesis: the size and composition of the inorganic carbon pool in bundle sheath cells. , 1987, Plant physiology.

[37]  D. Timlin,et al.  Temperature dependence of growth, development, and photosynthesis in maize under elevated CO2 , 2007 .

[38]  J. McGrath,et al.  Hourly and seasonal variation in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of soybean grown at future CO(2) and ozone concentrations for 3 years under fully open-air field conditions. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[39]  S. V. Caemmerer,et al.  Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis. , 2000 .

[40]  Effects of artificial warming on the structural, physiological, and biochemical changes of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves in northern China , 2013, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.

[41]  A. Rogers,et al.  Iowa State University From the SelectedWorks of Emily Heaton April , 2004 Leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate dynamics of soybeans grown throughout their life-cycle under Free-Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment , 2018 .

[42]  M. Westgate,et al.  Reproduction at Low and Pollen Water Potentials in Maize 1 , 1986 .

[43]  Will photosynthesis of maize (Zea mays) in the US Corn Belt increase in future [CO2] rich atmospheres? An analysis of diurnal courses of CO2 uptake under free‐air concentration enrichment (FACE) , 2004 .

[44]  W. Schlenker,et al.  Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  M. Z. Hussain,et al.  Future carbon dioxide concentration decreases canopy evapotranspiration and soil water depletion by field‐grown maize , 2013, Global change biology.

[46]  J. Hanway.  How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[47]  G. Edwards,et al.  Temperature Dependence of the Linkage of Quantum Yield of Photosystem II to CO2 Fixation in C4 and C3 Plants , 1993, Plant physiology.

[48]  M. Westgate,et al.  Plant factors controlling seed set in maize : the influence of silk, pollen, and ear-leaf water status and tassel heat treatment at pollination. , 1987, Plant physiology.

[49]  R. Sage,et al.  The temperature response of C(3) and C(4) photosynthesis. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[50]  L. Ziska,et al.  The growth response of C4 plants to rising atmospheric CO2 partial pressure: a reassessment , 2000 .

[51]  D. Lobell,et al.  Projected temperature changes indicate significant increase in interannual variability of U.S. maize yields , 2012, Climatic Change.

[52]  P. Reich,et al.  Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[53]  D. Easterling,et al.  Observations: Atmosphere and surface , 2013 .

[54]  A. Leakey,et al.  Impairment of C(4) photosynthesis by drought is exacerbated by limiting nitrogen and ameliorated by elevated [CO(2)] in maize. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[55]  P. Newton,et al.  Photosynthetic responses of temperate species to free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) in a grazed New Zealand pasture , 2001 .

[56]  M. E. Otegui,et al.  Ear temperature and pollination timing effects on maize kernel set , 2001 .