White certificate schemes : the static and dynamic efficiency of an adaptive policy instrument

White certificate schemes mandate energy companies to promote energy efficiency through flexibility mechanisms, including the trading of energy savings. They can be characterized as a quantity-based, baseline-and-credit system for the diffusion of energy efficient technologies. This paper offers a comprehensive comparison of experiences with white certificate schemes in Great Britain, Italy and France. Starting from the identification of the key drivers underlying each scheme, it proposes an original interpretation of this type of scheme as an adaptive instrument, in the sense that it can take different forms in response to specific institutional contexts. The analysis shows that schemes perform well in terms of static efficiency - they generate net social benefits over the period considered - though there are large discrepancies in cost-effectiveness due to various technical potentials across countries. They achieved mixed results regarding dynamic efficiency - the ability to induce and sustain technological change over the long run. Market transformation occurred in Great Britain, but was poorly incentivized in Italy and France due to inadequate compliance cost recovery rules. Substantial organisational change has occurred in every country, mainly by strengthening vertical relationships between obliged parties and upstream businesses. Overall, the obligation (rather than the market component) drives the early phases of the schemes.

[1]  P. Bertoldi,et al.  Tradable white certificate schemes: fundamental concepts , 2008 .

[2]  L. Goulder,et al.  Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[3]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Regulation as the Mother of Innovation: The Case of So2 Control , 2005 .

[4]  Lena Neij,et al.  A multi-criteria evaluation framework for tradable white certificate schemes , 2009 .

[5]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Cost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings from Market-Based Policies , 2002 .

[6]  R. Stavins,et al.  Market-Based Environmental Policies: What Can We Learn from U.S. Experience (and Related Research)? , 2003 .

[7]  M. Pavan.  Tradable white certificates: experiences and perspectives , 2012 .

[8]  P. Linares,et al.  Energy Efficiency: Economics and Policy , 2010 .

[9]  C. Fischer.  On the importance of the supply side in demand-side management , 2005 .

[10]  Henri Theil,et al.  On the Theory of Economic Policy , 1992 .

[11]  Nick Eyre,et al.  Energy company obligations to save energy in Italy, the UK and France: what have we learnt? , 2009 .

[12]  David M. Driesen.  The economic dynamics of environmental law , 2002 .

[13]  Luis Mundaca,et al.  Transaction costs of Tradable White Certificate schemes: The Energy Efficiency Commitment as case study , 2007 .

[14]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy , 2009 .

[15]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  An ex-ante evaluation of a White Certificates scheme in The Netherlands: A case study for the household sector , 2007 .

[16]  Edward Vine,et al.  Energy savings certificates: A market-based tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions , 2008 .

[17]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments , 2007 .

[18]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[19]  S. Svendsen,et al.  Residential and commercial buildings , 2012 .

[20]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[21]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Innovation and organizational networks : barriers to energy efficiency in the US housing industry , 1994 .

[22]  Scott Milliman,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply , 1992 .

[23]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  “White and Green”: Comparison of market-based instruments to promote energy efficiency , 2005 .

[24]  C. Jepma,et al.  White certificates for energy efficiency improvement with energy taxes: A theoretical economic model , 2008 .

[25]  N. Eyre,et al.  Public policy analysis of energy efficiency and load management in changing electricity businesses , 2003 .

[26]  Paul Baudry,et al.  Energy supplier obligations and white certificate schemes: Comparative analysis of experiences in the European Union , 2010 .

[27]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic literature and international experiences , 2002 .

[28]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Te , 1995 .

[29]  K. Gillingham,et al.  ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES: A Retrospective Examination , 2006 .

[30]  D. ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Potentials and costs of carbon dioxide mitigation in the world's buildings , 2008 .

[31]  ScienceDirect,et al.  Environmental innovation and societal transitions , 2011 .

[32]  Joachim Schleich,et al.  The Economics Of Energy Efficiency: Barriers to Cost-Effective Investment , 2004 .

[33]  O. Langniss,et al.  Interactions of white certificates with other policy instruments in Europe , 2008 .

[34]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[35]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  THE SO2 EMISSIONS TRADING PROGRAM: COST SAVINGS WITHOUT ALLOWANCE TRADES , 1996 .

[36]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  White certificate schemes: Economic analysis and interactions with the EU ETS , 2009 .

[37]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Economic incentives for environmental protection: Integrating theory and practice , 1992 .

[38]  P.G.M. Boonekamp,et al.  Evaluation of methods used to determine realized energy savings , 2006 .

[39]  Nick Johnstone,et al.  Ex Post Evaluation of Tradeable Permits , 2004 .

[40]  Adriaan Perrels,et al.  Market imperfections and economic efficiency of white certificate systems , 2008 .

[41]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of Tradable White Certificates Compared to Taxes, Subsidies and Regulations , 2008 .

[42]  Paul Waide,et al.  Utility energy efficiency schemes: savings obligations and trading , 2008 .

[43]  Lena Neij,et al.  Market behaviour and the to-trade-or-not-to-trade dilemma in ‘tradable white certificate’ schemes , 2008 .

[44]  R. Sobin,et al.  Energy Savings Credits: Are Potential Benefits Being Realized? , 2010 .

[45]  Amy A. Holcombe,et al.  Promoting , 2020, Strategic Talent Leadership for Educators.

[46]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Consumer–supplier–government triangular relations: Rethinking the UK policy path for carbon emissions reduction from the UK residential sector ☆ ☆☆ , 2009 .

[47]  M. Pavan,et al.  Tradable energy efficiency certificates: the Italian experience , 2008 .

[48]  Dominique Finon,et al.  The Static and Dynamic Efficiency of Instruments of Promotion of Renewables , 2003 .

[49]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[50]  D. Finon,et al.  The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes , 2012 .

[51]  Torstein Bye,et al.  Multiple instruments to change energy behaviour: The emperor’s new clothes? , 2008 .

[52]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  An adopter-centric approach to analyze the diffusion patterns of innovative residential heating systems in Sweden , 2008 .

[53]  A. Marin,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Comment☆ , 1991 .

[54]  Barbara Praetorius,et al.  How much market do market-based instruments create? An analysis for the case of "white" certificates , 2003 .