IP restoration vs. WDM protection: is there an optimal choice?

The exponentially growing number of Internet users armed with emerging multimedia Internet applications is continuously thirsty for more network capacity. Wavelength-division multiplexing networks that directly support IP-the so-called IP over WDM architecture-have the appropriate characteristics to quench this bandwidth thirst. As everyday life increasingly relies on telecommunication services, users become more and more demanding, and connection reliability is currently as critical as high capacity. Both IP and WDM layers can fulfil this need by providing various resilient schemes to protect users' traffic from disruptions due to network faults. This article first reviews the most common restoration and protection schemes available at the IP and WDM layers. These schemes may be present concurrently in the IP over WDM architecture, with the resilient mechanism of each connection specifically chosen as a function of the overall cost, application requirements, and management complexity. The article describes a versatile heuristic based on simulated annealing that may be adopted to optimize the concurrent use of IP restoration and WDM protection schemes in the same (mesh) network. The proposed heuristic allows varying the percentage of traffic protected by the WDM layer and that of traffic relying on IP restoration, taking into account topology constraints and network cost minimization. An additional feature of the proposed heuristic is the potential to trade solution optimality for computational time, thus yielding fast solutions in support of interactive design.

[1]  Christopher Metz On the Wire: IP Protection and Restoration , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[2]  Andrea Fumagalli,et al.  Survivable networks based on optimal routing and WDM self-healing rings , 1999, IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320).

[3]  Filip De Turck,et al.  Dimensioning of survivable WDM networks , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[4]  Wayne D. Grover,et al.  An algorithm for survivable network design employing multiple self-healing rings , 1993, Proceedings of GLOBECOM '93. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[5]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Design protection for WDM optical networks , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[6]  Luca Valcarenghi,et al.  Fast optimization of survivable WDM mesh networks based on multiple self-healing rings , 1999, Optics East.

[7]  Arunita Jaekel,et al.  Fault-tolerant routing scheme for all-optical networks , 1998, Other Conferences.

[8]  Gisli Hjalmtysson,et al.  Simple IP restoration for IP/GbE/10 GbE optical networks , 2000, Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Technical Digest Postconference Edition. Trends in Optics and Photonics Vol.37 (IEEE Cat. No. 00CH37079).

[9]  S. Ramamurthy,et al.  Survivable WDM Mesh Networks, Part II-Restoration , 1999 .

[10]  Arun K. Somani,et al.  Routing dependable connections with specified failure restoration guarantees in WDM networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[11]  Rajiv Ramaswami,et al.  Optical layer survivability: a services perspective , 2000, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[12]  T. M. Chen,et al.  Reliable services in MPLS , 1999, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[13]  Malathi Veeraraghavan,et al.  Protocols and architectures for IP optical networking , 1999, Bell Labs Technical Journal.