Changes in Cervical Canal Spinal Volume During In Vitro Flexion‐Extension

Study Design. Quasistatic flexion and extension loads were applied in vitro to lower cervical spines. The flexion‐extension motion produced was checked for physiologic relevance. Objectives. To examine the changes in the volume of the cervical spinal canal in flexion‐extension motion. Summary of Background Data. Many papers have been published concerning the cervical canal volume as inferred from standard lateral radiographs. This study compares the inferred (radiographic) volumes and their changes to the physical changes within the spinal canal. Methods. The lower cervical spines (C2‐C7) from 10 cadavers were subject to stepwise flexion and extension in a purpose‐built rig. Before this testing, the spinal cord was removed from the canal space of each specimen and replaced by a thin latex tube stoppered and secured at the opening of the canal (at C2) so that the volume of liquid displaced from the tube could be measured. This was done at each loading stage by means of a graduated glass column, and a radiograph of the spine was also taken to allow angular and displacement readings to be taken from C2 to C7. Results. The average recorded change in volume of the spinal canal with flexion‐extension motion was 1.9 ml, and showed a significant linear correlation with the dynamic canal width (r = 0.868, P < 0.05) and also with the total angle of flexion or extension (r = 0.979, P < 0.005). The volume of liquid displaced from the canal in lateral bending was much lower than that in flexion‐extension motion, and only amounted to about 0.2 ml. The angular ranges of motion produced at each level were compared to previous results obtained in vivo, and no significant differences between the angular displacements found in vivo and in vitro under this experimental arrangement were seen. Conclusions. The loading regime described in this study causes angular displacements similar to those in vivo, and on this basis is a physiologically relevant loading pattern. The change in the volume of the spinal canal between C2 and C7 shows linear relationships with the angle of flexion and the dynamic canal width.

[1]  W. Southwick,et al.  Cervical orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Z. Zhihua,et al.  The Effect of Flexion-Extension Motion of the Lumbar Spine on the Capacity of the Spinal Canal: An Experimental Study , 1989 .

[3]  Andrew Holmes,et al.  The Range and Nature of Flexion‐Extension Motion in the Cervical Spine , 1994, Spine.

[4]  M. Sumi,et al.  Pathomechanism, Pathogenesis, and Results of Treatment in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Dynamic Canal Stenosis , 1990, Spine.

[5]  M. Hamada,et al.  Etiologic factors of myelopathy. A radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Functional Radiographic Diagnosis of the Cervical Spine: Flexion/Extension , 1988, Spine.

[7]  J. Black Dead or alive: the problem of in vitro tissue mechanics. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  L. Penning Normal movements of the cervical spine. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  D W Hukins,et al.  Comparison of Structure, Mechanical Properties, and Functions of Lumbar Spinal Ligaments , 1990, Spine.

[10]  Tony S. Keller,et al.  1990 Volvo Award in experimental studies. The dependence of intervertebral disc mechanical properties on physiologic conditions. , 1990 .

[11]  J. Dvorak,et al.  In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  E. H. Burrows The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. , 1963, Clinical radiology.