Forensic identification reporting using automatic speaker recognition systems

We show how any speaker recognition system can be adapted to provide its results according to the Bayesian approach for evidence analysis and forensic reporting. This approach, firmly established in other forensic areas as fingerprint, DNA or fiber analysis, suits the needs of both the court and the forensic scientist. We show the inadequacy of the classical approach to forensic reporting because of the use of thresholds and the suppression of the prior probabilities related to the case. We also show how to assess the performance of those forensic systems through Tippet plots. Finally, an example is shown using NIST-Ahumada eval'2001 data, where the speaker recognition abilities of our system are assessed through DET plots, using then these raw scores as evidences into the forensic system, where relative to populations we will obtain the corresponding likelihood ratios values, which are assessed through Tippet (1968) plots.

[1]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models , 1995, Speech Commun..

[2]  C.G.G. Aitken EVIDENCE | Statistical Interpretation of Evidence/Bayesian Analysis , 2000 .

[3]  J. Ortega-Garcia On the Application of the Bayesian Framework to Real Forensic Conditions with GMM-based Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Hirotaka Nakasone,et al.  Forensic automatic speaker recognition , 2001, Odyssey.

[5]  Didier Meuwly,et al.  The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition , 2000, Speech Commun..

[6]  Didier Meuwly,et al.  Forensic speaker recognition based on a Bayesian framework and Gaussian mixture modelling (GMM) , 2001, Odyssey.

[7]  G. Annas,et al.  Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al.  IDENTIVOX © : A PC-WINDOWS TM TOOL FOR TEXT-INDEPENDENT SPEAKER RECOGNITION IN FORENSIC ENVIRONMENTS , 2001 .

[9]  I. W. Evett,et al.  Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework , 1998 .

[10]  Alvin F. Martin,et al.  The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[11]  Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al.  On the application of the Bayesian approach in real forensic conditions with GMM-based systems , 2001, Odyssey.

[12]  Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al.  AHUMADA: A large speech corpus in Spanish for speaker characterization and identification , 2000, Speech Commun..

[13]  A Richardson,et al.  The evidential value of the comparison of paint flakes from sources other than vehicles. , 1968, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[14]  Bernard Robertson,et al.  Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom , 1995 .