Analysis of safety margin of in-vessel retention for AP1000

In-vessel retention (IVR) of core melt is a key severe accident management strategy adopted by most operating nuclear power plants and advanced light water reactors (ALWRs), AP600, AP1000, etc. External reactor vessel cooling (ERVC) is a novel severe accident management for IVR analysis. In present study, IVR analysis code in severe accident (IVRASA) has been developed to evaluate the safety margin of IVR in AP1000 with anticipative depressurization and reactor cavity flooding in severe accident. For, IVRASA, the point estimate procedure has been developed for modeling the steady-state endpoint of two core melt configurations: Configuration I and Configuration II. The results of benchmark calculations of AP600 by IVRASA were consistent with those of the UCSB and INEEL. Then, IVRASA is used to calculate the heat transfer process caused by two core melt configurations of AP1000. The results of calculations of Configuration I indicate that the heat flux remains below the critical heat flux (CHF), however, the sensitivity calculations show that the heat flux in the metallic layer could exceed the CHF because of the focusing effect due to the thin metallic layer. On the other hand, the results of calculations of Configuration II suggest that the thermal failure of the lower head at the bottom location is highly unlikely, but the heat flux in light metallic layer could be higher than that of base case due to the portion of metal partitioning into the lower head. This work also investigated the effect of the uncertainties of the CHF correlations on the analysis of IVR.

[1]  G. L. Thinnes,et al.  Potential for AP600 in-vessel retention through ex-vessel flooding , 1997 .

[2]  Marc Barrachin,et al.  Phase diagram of the UO2-FeO1+x system , 2007 .

[3]  Marc Barrachin,et al.  Phase diagram of the ZrO2–FeO system , 2006 .

[4]  K. H. Haddad,et al.  Critical heat flux (CHF) phenomenon on a downward facing curved surface , 1997 .

[5]  D. Bottomley,et al.  Phase transformation in the binary section of the UO2-FeO-Fe system , 2007 .

[6]  Jacopo Buongiorno,et al.  A feasibility assessment of the use of nanofluids to enhance the in-vessel retention capability in light-water reactors , 2009 .

[7]  Jean-Marie Seiler,et al.  Theoretical Analysis for Corium Pool with Miscibility Gap , 2003 .

[8]  Fan-bill B. Cheung,et al.  CRITICAL HEAT FLUX FOR DOWNWARD-FACING BOILING ON A COATED HEMISPHERICAL VESSEL SURROUNDED BY AN INSULATION STRUCTURE , 2005 .

[9]  Karine Froment,et al.  Consequences of material effects on in-vessel retention , 2007 .

[10]  J. P. Tu,et al.  Two-Phase Natural Circulation Flow in AP-1000 In-Vessel Retention-Related ULPU-V Facility Experiments , 2004 .

[11]  L. P. Mezentseva,et al.  Phase relations in the ZrO2-FeO system , 2006 .

[12]  S. Churchill,et al.  Correlating equations for laminar and turbulent free convection from a vertical plate , 1975 .

[13]  Hans K. Fauske,et al.  External cooling of a reactor vessel under severe accident conditions , 1993 .

[14]  T. G. Theofanous,et al.  In-Vessel Retention Technology Development and Use for Advanced PWR Designs in the USA and Korea , 2004 .

[15]  C. Guéneau,et al.  Liquid immiscibility in a (O, U, Zr) model corium , 1998 .

[16]  Manfred Fischer,et al.  New experimental results on the interaction of molten corium with reactor vessel steel , 2004 .

[17]  M. Khatib-Rahbar,et al.  Analysis of likelihood of lower head failure and ex-vessel fuel coolant interaction energetics for AP1000 , 2005 .

[18]  S. V. Beshta,et al.  Distribution of components between immiscible melts of a system under nonisothermal conditions , 2006 .

[19]  B. Cheynet,et al.  Progress in the thermodynamic modelling of the O–U–Zr ternary system , 2004 .

[20]  D. Dropkin,et al.  Natural-Convection Heat Transfer in Liquids Confined by Two Horizontal Plates and Heated From Below , 1959 .

[21]  T. G. Theofanous,et al.  The first results from the ACOPO experiment , 1997 .

[22]  Vijay K. Dhir,et al.  An experimental study of natural convection in a volumetrically heated spherical pool bounded on top with a rigid wall , 1996 .

[23]  D. L. Knudson,et al.  In-Vessel Retention Modeling Capabilities of SCDAP/RELAP5-3D© , 2002 .

[24]  V. D. Loktionov,et al.  Numerical investigation of the reactor pressure vessel behaviour under severe accident conditions taking into account the combined processes of the vessel creep and the molten pool natural convection , 1999 .

[25]  S. E. Slezak,et al.  Ex-vessel boiling experiments: laboratory- and reactor-scale testing of the flooded cavity concept for in-vessel core retention Part II: Reactor-scale boiling experiments of the flooded cavity concept for in-vessel core retention , 1997 .

[26]  V. Gusarov,et al.  Influence of the Temperature Difference at Immiscibility Liquids Interface on their Phase Instability , 2007 .

[27]  S. B. Kim,et al.  CHF enhancement by vessel coating for external reactor vessel cooling , 2004 .