Anger and flaming in computer-mediated negotiation among strangers

The present study explores the antecedents of the antinormative hostile communication of emotion, termed flaming, in the context of computer-mediated negotiation. We find that flaming is associated with anger directed toward the negotiating context; this can occur when a negotiator becomes frustrated due to problems with communication channel characteristics or due to uncertainty surrounding the negotiation task. We also find that flaming is associated with anger directed toward a negotiator's partner, which can occur when a negotiator perceives that the partner is being unfair. We find further that anger totally mediates the relationships between flaming and its antecedents. These findings provide the basis to argue that anger reduction can effectively decrease flaming, independent of the existence of flaming antecedents, such as unfairness. We therefore provide suggestions that can help with the reduction of anger in such circumstances.

[1]  J. Forgas Feeling and thinking : the role of affect in social cognition , 2000 .

[2]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[3]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[4]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  F. Medina,et al.  Computer-Mediated Negotiation of an Escalated Conflict , 2002 .

[6]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[7]  Eugene R. Oetting,et al.  State–Trait Anger Theory and the utility of the Trait Anger Scale. , 1996 .

[8]  R. Digiuseppe,et al.  Understanding Anger Disorders , 2006 .

[9]  Ned Kock,et al.  Can communication medium limitations foster better group outcomes? An action research study , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiating over Time: Impediments to Integrative Solutions , 1995 .

[11]  R. Eisler,et al.  Anger control: An experimental comparison of three behavioral treatments , 1983 .

[12]  J. Axelrod,et al.  Stress hormones: their interaction and regulation. , 1984, Science.

[13]  U. Lundberg Coping with Stress: Neuroendocrine Reactions and Implications for Health. , 1999, Noise & health.

[14]  P. Ekman Facial expression and emotion. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[15]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations , 1987 .

[16]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Ronald W. Rogers,et al.  Expressions of Aggression , 1980 .

[18]  B. Bushman,et al.  Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Richard B. Felson,et al.  Violence, aggression & coercive actions , 1994 .

[21]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[22]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[23]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: the dark side of high self-esteem. , 1996, Psychological review.

[24]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[25]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  Handbook of cognition and emotion , 1999 .

[26]  R. Bales Interaction process analysis , 1976 .

[27]  M. Bazerman Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[28]  S. Ramsay Violence , 2000, The Lancet.

[29]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Consequences require antecedents: Toward a process model of emotion elicitation. , 2000 .

[30]  R. Geen,et al.  Aggression : theoretical and empirical reviews , 1983 .

[31]  Martin Lea,et al.  Contexts of computer-mediated communication , 1992 .

[32]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[33]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[36]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[37]  William C. Pedersen,et al.  Chewing on it can chew you up: effects of rumination on triggered displaced aggression. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A New Conceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers , 1995 .

[40]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[42]  Jeffrey Z. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation theory and practice , 1991 .

[43]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[44]  B. Törestad,et al.  What is anger provoking? A psychophysical study of perceived causes of anger. , 1990 .

[45]  W. Bottom,et al.  Negotiator Risk: Sources of Uncertainty and the Impact of Reference Points on Negotiated Agreements. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[46]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  'A MATTER OF TRUST' : EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION ON THE EFFICIENCY AND DISTRIBUTION OF OUTCOMES , 1998 .

[47]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Shattering the Illusion of Control: Multi-shot Versus Single-Shot Gambles , 1994 .

[48]  R. Mccaldon,et al.  Aggression * , 1964 .

[49]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers , 1996 .

[50]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[51]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[52]  G. G. Colomb,et al.  Visible conversation and academic inquiry : CMC in a culturally diverse classroom , 1996 .

[53]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  B. Bushman Does Venting Anger Feed or Extinguish the Flame? Catharsis, Rumination, Distraction, Anger, and Aggressive Responding , 2002 .

[55]  A. Goldberger,et al.  The Imperial Animal , 1973, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[56]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[57]  C. Dreu Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation , 2003 .

[58]  S. Herring Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .

[59]  R. Thornton Mediation , 2003, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[60]  Theodore Nadelson Prisoners of Hate: The Cognitive Basis of Anger, Hostility, and Violence , 2002 .

[61]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Flaming in the Electronic Classroom , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[63]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[64]  R. Felson,et al.  Impression management and the escalation of aggression and violence. , 1982, Social psychology quarterly.

[65]  E. Langer,et al.  Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. , 1975 .

[66]  E. Langer,et al.  The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  Roger Lewin,et al.  People of the Lake: Mankind and Its Beginnings , 1978 .

[68]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application , 2002 .

[69]  W. Mischel Introduction to personality , 1971 .

[70]  Philip A. Thompsen,et al.  Effects of Pictographs and Quoting on Flaming in Electronic Mail. , 1996 .

[71]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  The power of alternatives or the limits to negotiation , 1985 .

[72]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[73]  C. Anderson,et al.  The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: evidence from electronically mediated disputes. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[74]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[75]  William A. Donohue,et al.  Negotiator-Opponent Relationships , 1992 .

[76]  L. Berkowitz Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[78]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Frustrations, appraisals, and aversively stimulated aggression , 1988 .

[80]  B. Bushman,et al.  Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[81]  Michael Elwood Roloff,et al.  Communication Perspectives on Negotiation , 1992 .

[82]  Alma Mintu-Wimsatt,et al.  Equity Sensitivity and Negotiation Behaviors: A Look at Mexican Exporters , 2004 .

[83]  Raymond W. Novaco,et al.  Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. , 1975 .

[84]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[85]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Get mad and get more than even : When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations , 2006 .

[86]  William L. Ury,et al.  Getting to Yes , 2019, Boy on the Bridge.

[87]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .

[88]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[89]  J. M. Kayany Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: flaming in social newsgroups on Usenet , 1998 .

[90]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Communication and Negotiation , 1992 .

[91]  Deepak Malhotra,et al.  Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties , 2004 .

[92]  Heads, I Win , 2007, Science.

[93]  Michael Merbaum,et al.  Behavior change through self-control , 1972 .